Reconstruction of extended cortical sources for EEG and MEG based on a Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain estimator

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 100-110

  Kincses, Wilhelm Emil ^b   Braun, Christoph ^a   Kaiser, Stefan ^b   Grodd, Wolfgang ^b   Ackermann, Hermann ^b   Mathiak, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

EEG; Extended sources; Inverse problem; MEG; Source reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NERVE CELL; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEURONS;

EID: 0037304772     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10079     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baillet S, Garnero L. 1997. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:374-385.
2. Baumgartner C, Doppelbauer A, Sutherling WW, Lindinger G, Levesque MF, Aull S, Zeitlhofer J, Deecke L. 1993. Somatotopy of human somatosensory cortex as studied in scalp EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:271-279.
3. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comp 7:1129-1159.
4. Braun C, Kaiser S, Kincses WE, Elbert T. 1997. Confidence interval of single dipole locations based on EEG data. Brain Topogr 10:31-39.
5. Braun C, Schweizer R, Elbert T, Birbaumer N, Taub E. 2000. Differential activation in somatosensory cortex for different discrimination tasks. J Neurosci 20:446-450.
6. Dale AM, Sereno MI. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 5:162-176.
7. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E. 1995a. Increase of cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270:305-307.
8. Elbert T, Junghofer M, Scholz B, Schneider S. 1995b. The separation of overlapping neuromagnetic sources in first and second somatosensory cortices. Brain Topogr 7:275-282.
9. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. 1995. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 375:482-484.
10. Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T, Birbaumer N. 1997. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic pain patients. Neurosci Lett 224:5-8.
11. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Wischmann HA, Ottenberg K, Dössel O. 1994. Possibilities of functional brain imaging using a combination of MEG and MRT. In: Pantev C, Elbert T, Lütkenhöner B, editors. Oscillatory event related brain dynamics. New York: Plenum Press, p 435-457.
12. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kohler T, Wischmann HA. 1999. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J Clin Neurophysiol 16:267-95.
13. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Gevins A, Le J, Brickett P, Reutter B, Desmond J. 1991. Seeing through the skull: advanced EEGs use MRIs to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp. Brain Topogr 4:125-131.
15. Hari R, Karhu J, Hämäläinen M, Knuutila J, Salonen O, Sams M, Vikman V. 1993. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: A neuromagnetic study. Eur J Neurosci 5:724-734.
16. Honerkamp J. 1998. Statistical physics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, editors. 1991. Principles of neural science, 3rd ed. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
17. Kincses WE, Braun C, Kaiser S, Elbert T. 1999. Modeling extended sources of event-related potentials using anatomical and physiological constraints. Hum Brain Mapp 8:182-193.
18. Lütkenhöner B, Menninghaus E, Steinsträter O, Wienbruch C, Gissler HM, Elbert T. 1995. Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model. Brain Topogr 7:291-229.
19. Makeig S, Jung TP, Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. 1996. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In: Touretzky D, Mozer M, Hasselmo M, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 8. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, p 145-151.
20. Mitzdorf U. 1987. Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. Int J Neurosci 33:33-59.
21. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. 1992. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:541-557.
22. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehman D. 1994. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new approach for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18:49-65.
23. Pearson PP, Li CX, Waters RS. 1999. Effects of large-scale limb deafferentation on the morphological and physiological organization of the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) in somatosensory cortex (SI) in adult and neonatal rats. Exp Brain Res 128:315-331.
24. Sarvas J. 1987. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32:11-22.
25. Scherg M, Berg P. 1991. Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topogr 4:143-150.
26. Scherg M, von Cramon D. 1986. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol 65:344-360.
27. Schmidt DM, George JS, Wood CC. 1999. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Hum Brain Mapp 7:195-212.
28. Wang JZ, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. 1992. Magnetic source images determined by a lead field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:665-675.
29. Wang JZ, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. 1993. Magnetic source imaging based on the minimum-norm least-squares inverse. Brain Topogr 5:365-371.