Confidence interval of single dipole locations based on EEG data

Brain Topography

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 31-39

  Braun, Christoph ^a   Kaiser, Stefan ^a   Kincses, Wilhelm Emil ^a   Elbert, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Confidence interval; Dipole localization; EEG; MEG; Monte Carlo

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ERROR; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FINGER; LOWER LIP; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THUMB;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FINGERS; HUMANS; LIP; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ORIENTATION; THUMB;

EID: 0030670933     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022258923199     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barth, D.S., Sutherling, W., Broffmann, J. and Beatty, J. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986, 63: 260-273.
2. Cohen, D., Cuffin, B. N., Yanokuchi, K., Municwski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G. R., Ives , J., Kennedym, J. G. and Schomer, D. MEG versus EEG localization Test using implanted sources in the human brain. Annals of Neurology, 1990, 28 (6): 811-817.
3. Cuffin, B. N. Effects on measurement errors and noise on MEG moving dipole inverse solutions. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1986, 33: 854-861
4. Cuffin, B.N. and Cohen, D. Comparison of the magneto- encephalogram and the electroencephalogram. Electroencencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1979, 47: 132-146.
5. Gharib, S., Sutherling, W. W., Nakasato, N., Barth, D. S., Baumgartner, C., Alexopoulos, N., Taylor, S. and Roberts, R. L. MEG and ECoG localization accuracy test. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1995, 94: 109-114.
6. Hari, R., Joutsiniemi, S.-L. and Sarvas, J. Saptial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1988, 71: 64-72.
7. Huizenga, H. M. and Molenaar, C. M. Equivalent source estimation of scalp potential fields contaminated by heteroscedastic and correlated noise. Brain Topography, 1995, 8 (1): 13 -33.
8. Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Leiderer, P., Berg, P., Rockstroh, B. Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: A strategy for uncovering cortical sources. Brain Topography, 1997, 9 (3): 203-217.
9. Kuriki, S., Murase, M. and Takeuchi, F. Locating accuracy of a current source of neurmagnetic responses: simulation study for a single current dipole in spherical conductor. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1989 73: 499-506.
10. Mosher, J. C., Spencer, M. E., Leahy, R. M. and Lewis, P. S. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1993, 86, 303-321.
11. Ogura, Y. and Sekihara, K. Relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography. IEEE-Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1993,40(9): 919-924.
12. Radich, B. M. EEG dipole localization bounds and MAP algorithms for head models with parameter uncertainities. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1995, 42 (3): 233-241.
13. Sarvas, J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol., 1987, 32(1): 11-22.
14. Stok, C. J. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1987, 34 (4) 289-296.
15. Yamazaki, T., van Dijk, B. W. and Spekreijse, H. Confidence limits for the parameter estimation in the dipole localization method on the basis of spatial correlation of background EEG. Brain Topography, 1992, 5(2): 195-197.