Magnetic domain walls in single-phase and phase-separated double-exchange systems

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages

  Golosov, D I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL; MANGANESE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY TRANSFER; FILM; GEOMETRY; MAGNETISM; PHASE TRANSITION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037304005     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.064404     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Q. Lu, C.-C. Chen, and A. de Lozanne, Science276, 2006 (1997).
2. T. Fukumura, H. Suguwara, T. Hasegawa, K. Tanaka, H. Sakaki, T. Kimura, and Y. Tokura, Science284, 1969 (1999).
3. C. Kwon, M C. Robson, K.-C. Kim, J Y. Gu, S E. Lofland, S M. Bhagat, Z. Trajanovic, M. Rajeswari, T. Venkatesan, A R. Kratz, R D. Gomez, and R. Ramesh, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.172, 229 (1997).
4. U. Welp, A. Berger, V K. Vlasko-Vlasov, Qing’An Li, K E. Gray, and J F. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. B62, 8615 (2000).
5. N D. Mathur, P B. Littlewood, N K. Todd, S P. Isaac, B.-S. Teo, D.-J. Kang, E J. Tarte, Z H. Barber, J E. Evetts, and G. Blamire, J. Appl. Phys.86, 6287 (1999).
6. Qi Li, Y F. Hu, and H S. Wang, J. Appl. Phys.89, 6952 (2001);
7. Qi Li and H S. Wang, J. Supercond.14, 231 (2001);
8. H. S. Wang and Qi Li (unpublished) (the latter was received upon completion of the present work).
9. Y. Wu, Y. Suzuki, U. Rüdiger, J. Yu, A D. Kent, T K. Nath, and C B. Eom, Appl. Phys. Lett.75, 2295 (1999).
10. S J. Lloyd, N D. Mathur, J C. Loudon, and P A. Midgley, Phys. Rev. B64, 172407 (2001).
11. A. Gupta, G Q. Gong, G. Xiao, P R. Duncombe, P. Lecoeur, P. Trouilloud, Y Y. Wang, V P. Dravid, and J Z. Sun, Phys. Rev. B54, 15 629 (1996);
12. D K. Petrov, A. Gupta, J R. Kirtley, L. Krusin-Elbaum, and H S. Gill, J. Appl. Phys.83, 7061 (1998).
13. Y.-A. Soh, G. Aeppli, N D. Mathur, and M G. Blamire, J. Appl. Phys.87, 6743 (2000);
14. Y.-A. SohG. AeppliN D. MathurM G. BlamirePhys. Rev. B63, 020402 (2001).
15. D J. Miller, Y K. Lin, V. Vlasko-Vlasov, and U. Welp, J. Appl. Phys.87, 6758 (2000).
16. Cf. Ref. 5 and N D. Mathur and P B. Littlewood, Solid State Commun.119, 271 (2001).
17. (formula presented) and (formula presented) directed along the principal directions of the inverse lattice, are not to be mixed with diagonally directed and rescaled (formula presented) and (formula presented) introduced later in the article.
18. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshits, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, Theoretical Physics, Vol. 8 (Pergamon, New York, 1984).
19. D I. Golosov, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3974 (2000).
20. S. Zhang and Z. Yang, J. Appl. Phys.79, 7398 (1996).
21. We neglect the magnetostatic energy associated with the domain wall in a film. In this limit the wall has the same structure as in the 3D case considered in Ref. 14, and is more properly called the Landau-Lifshits wall [see, e.g., A. Aharoni, Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)]. Our treatment remains valid when the anisotropy axis is parallel to the film, although the spin rotation then takes place in a different plane in spin space (Néel wall).
22. E L. Nagaev, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 11, 2779 (1969) [Sov. Phys. Solid State11, 2249 (1970)].
23. We stress that the magnetic properties of these two systems are by no means identical, which can be seen from Eq. (3), yielding a Heisenberg (cosine) dispersion law at (formula presented) but not for any finite (formula presented) value.
24. E.L. Nagaev, Colossal Magnetoresistance and Phase Separation in Magnetic Semiconductors (Imperial College Press, London, 2002), and references therein.
25. E. Dagotto, T. Hotta, and A. Moreo, Phys. Rep.344, 1 (2001), and references therein.
26. D I. Golosov, J. Appl. Phys.91, 7508 (2002);
27. D.I. Golosov (unpublished).
28. D I. Golosov, J. Appl. Phys.87, 5804 (2000).
29. P W. Anderson and H. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev.100, 675 (1955).
30. The integration variable (formula presented) corresponds to (formula presented) We also assume that (formula presented) is negative; the (formula presented) case is treated similarly.
31. Bloch wall energy, i.e., the change in the thermodynamic potential associated with the Bloch wall, can also be evaluated in a similar way, thus confirming the classical result (2).
32. When the principal contribution to the spin stiffness D originates from a large ferromagnetic superexchange, (formula presented) the Bloch wall remains stable even when the inequality (20) is violated. Due to the absence of carriers near the center of the wall, the domain wall then becomes impenetrable for electrical current.
33. In the limit of low hole doping, (formula presented) one similarly finds (formula presented)
34. By using the Hamiltonian (1), which does not include Coulomb interactions.
35. This holds for both finite and infinite values of Hund’s rule coupling. In the case of (formula presented) the carrier wave functions must vanish at the wall, whereas at finite values of (formula presented) the exponential tail of the spin-up wave function extends into the spin-down magnetic domain and vice versa [see Eq. (10)].
36. In three dimensions, one finds that the energy per unit area of partition is (formula presented) [see Eq. (A20)].
37. It is because of the 1D character of the perturbation that one is able to introduce a spectral shift function in this way; Eq. (27) generalizes the standard Lifshits-Krein trace formula (Ref. 33).
38. I M. Lifshits, Usp. Mat. Nauk7(1), 171 (1952);
39. I.M. Lifshits, S.A. Gredeskul, and L.A. Pastur, Introduction to the Theory of Disordered Systems (Wiley, New York, 1988), Chap. 5;
40. M.G. Krein, Topics in Differential Equations and Operator Theory (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1983), pp. 107–172.
41. D I. Golosov, M R. Norman, and K. Levin, Phys. Rev. B58, 8617 (1998).
42. At these values of J, the uniform ferromagnetic state is typically unstable with respect to phase separation.
43. We emphasize that this statement applies to the intermediate doping range (formula presented)
44. Adding a nonzero superexchange, (formula presented) would (i) result in the diagonal (rather than vertical) abrupt wall being preferred at low x and (ii) give rise to a phase-separation instability within a certain low-(formula presented) region.
45. Phase separation was indeed detected in (formula presented) with (formula presented) [see M. Respaud, J M. Broto, H. Rakoto, J. Vanacken, P. Wagner, C. Martin, A. Maignan, and B. Raveau, Phys. Rev. B63, 144426 (2001)].
46. It is likely that it also occurs in electron-doped monolayered compounds, like (formula presented) [A. Maignan, C. Martin, G. van Tendeloo, M. Hervieu, and B. Raveau, J. Mater. Chem.8, 2411 (1998)].
47. E L. Nagaev, Phys. Rep.346, 387 (2001), and references therein.
48. Y. Shapira, S. Foner, N F. Oliveira, Jr., and T B. Reed, Phys. Rev. B10, 4765 (1974);
49. M. Umehara, Phys. Rev. B60, 445 (1999).
50. S. Broderick, B. Ruzicka, L. Degiorgi, H R. Ott, J L. Sarrao, and Z. Fisk, Phys. Rev. B65, 121102 (2002), and references therein.
51. Such a wave function does not necessarily have to be a Bloch wave. In a purely 1D case, this would be a cosine wave, and it is also important that its wave vector will have to be related to the energy of the localized state by the usual tight-binding dispersion relation. We note that the choice of the basic set of electron energy eigenstates used in the Lifshits-Krein trace formalism [cf. Eqs. (29) and (31)] is, in principle, arbitrary.
52. We consider the single-band case [cf. Eq. (1)], when the carriers originate solely from doping, and not from band overlap.
53. Some possible examples of antiferromagnetic phases are discussed in Ref. 22.
54. F. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 546 (1967);
55. F. Stern and W E. Howard, Phys. Rev.163, 816 (1967).
56. A L. Fetter, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)81, 367 (1973).
57. This requirement is perhaps somewhat relaxed in the case of a thin film, due to the power-law (rather than exponential—see Appendix B) decay of the screened Coulomb potential.
58. A S. Alexandrov and A M. Bratkovsky, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter11, L531 (1999), and references therein.
59. J.-H. Park, C T. Chen, S.-W. Cheong, W. Bao, G. Meigs, V. Chakarian, and Y U. Idzerda, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4215 (1996);
60. D. S. Dessau and Z.-X. Shen, in Colossal Magnetoresistive Oxides, edited by Y. Tokura (Gordon and Breach, New York, 2000), and references therein.
61. Strictly speaking, there is also a surface charge (and hence Coulomb energy) associated with the interphase boundary itself, which in this respect is similar to the abrupt domain walls considered in Sec. III. Throughout Sec. IV we omit these electrostatic corrections to the energies of abrupt and Bloch domain walls and interphase boundaries. They are expected to be much smaller than the electrostatic energies of the large charged islands considered here.
62. The numerical smallness of W (which can be estimated as half the energy of an abrupt domain wall; see in the text below) and the fact that the actual values of (formula presented) are large result in the value of (formula presented) [see Eq. (41)] being small and, more generally, in (formula presented) It is therefore consistent to assume (formula presented) when evaluating abrupt wall energies and W.
63. We recall that the interphase boundaries are expected to be abrupt (Ref. 22).
64. V A. Kashin and E L. Nagaev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66, 2105 (1974) [Sov. Phys. JETP39, 1036 (1974)];
65. E L. Nagaev, Phys. Rev. B62, 5751 (2000).
66. This method is exact for the stripe phase in 3D.
67. See, e.g., E. Eisenberg, R. Berkovits, D A. Huse, and B L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. B65, 134437 (2002), Fig. 11.
68. This holds within the Wigner-cell approximation for the stripe phase. Within a more rigorous treatment, (formula presented) will vanish at a certain point near (formula presented)
69. Thus, the interphase boundaries within the film can be oriented perpendicularly to the film plane.
70. J. Krupka, R G. Geyer, M. Kuhn, and J H. Hinken, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.42, 1886 (1994);
71. T. Konaka, M. Sato, H. Asano, and S. Kubo, J. Supercond.4, 283 (1991).
72. Although under certain conditions stripe wall formation may be possible in the opposite case of a thick film or bulk crystal (see below and Appendix B), there is no reason to expect that these conditions are satisfied for the thicker samples studied in Ref. 6.
73. E. Sawaguchi, A. Kikuchi, and Y. Kodera, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.17, 1666 (1962);
74. T. Sakudo and H. Unoki, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 851 (1971).
75. The change of domain wall structure in the film may be further assisted by the well-known structural phase transition in strontium titanate, which takes place at about the same temperature [see G. Shirane and Y. Yamada, Phys. Rev.177, 858 (1969), and references therein;
76. V K. Vlasko-Vlasov, Y K. Lin, D J. Miller, U. Welp, G W. Crabtree, and V I. Nikitenko, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2239 (2000)].
77. For very large values of Hund’s rule coupling, (formula presented) abrupt walls can also be stabilized at low hole doping, (formula presented) Because of an effective antiferromagnetism associated with the finite value of (formula presented) in real systems (and reflected, e.g., in the antiferromagnetic ordering commonly observed in manganates at (formula presented) it is unlikely that this situation can be realized experimentally.
78. M. Yamanaka and N. Nagaosa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65, 3088 (1996).
79. N D. Mathur, G. Burnell, S P. Isaac, T J. Jackson, B.-S. Teo, J L. MacManus-Driscoll, L F. Cohen, J E. Evetts, and M G. Blamire, Nature (London)387, 266 (1997).
80. Y.-A. Soh, P G. Evans, Z. Cai, B. Lai, C.-Y. Kim, G. Aeppli, N D. Mathur, M G. Blamire, and E D. Isaacs, J. Appl. Phys.91, 7742 (2002), and references therein.
81. V K. Vlasko-Vlasov, U. Welp, D J. Miller, Y K. Lin, and G W. Crabtree, J. Appl. Phys.91, 7721 (2002).
82. A. Biswas, M. Rajeswari, R C. Srivastava, T. Venkatesan, R L. Greene, Q. Lu, A L. de Lozanne, and A J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B63, 184424 (2001);
83. A P. Nosov and P. Strobel, Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 93 (3), 50 (2002) [Phys. Met. Metallogr.93, 239 (2002)].
84. M. Pratzer, H J. Elmers, M. Bode, O. Pietzsch, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 127201 (2001);
85. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. Stöhr, A. Scholl, T J. Regan, S. Anders, J. Lüning, M R. Scheinfein, H A. Padmore, and R L. White, 83, 1862 (1999).
86. Equations (A12) and (A13) correct misprints in expressions for related quantities, (formula presented) and (formula presented) published earlier in Ref. 22.