A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 321-363

  Swanson, H Lee ^a   Lussier, Catherine M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035374213     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543071002321     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Becker, B. J. (1990). Coaching for the scholastic aptitude test: Further synthesis and appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 313-419.
2. Becker, B. J., & Schram, C. M., (1994). Examining explanatory models through research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 357-383). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley Interscience.
5. Bransford, J. C., Delclos, J. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479-496). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1999). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In P. Lloyd (Ed.), L. Vygotsky: Critical assessments: the zones of proximal development (Vol. 3, pp. 225-256). New York: Routledge.
7. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
8. Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential: A supplementary procedure for assessing the ability to reason. Seminar in Psychiatry, 1, 278-290.
9. Budoff, M. (1987a). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Budoff, M. (1987b). The validity of learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic Testing (pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Campbell, C., & Carlson, J. S. (1995). The dynamic assessment of mental abilities. In J. S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 3. European contributions to dynamic assessment. London: JAI Press.
12. Campione, J. C. (1989). Assisted testing: A taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 151-165.
13. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic testing with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., Jones, R. S., & Steinberg, E. (1985). Breakdowns in the flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9, 297-315.
15. Carlson, K. D., & Schmidt, F. L. (1999). Impact of experimental design on effect size: Findings from the research literature on training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 851-862.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
17. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and issues for a field setting. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Dearborne, D. F. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123-147.
20. Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted testing: If it is "dynamic" why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10, 48-58.
21. Elliot, J., & Lauchlan, F. (1997). Assessing potential - the search for the philosopher's stone? Education and Child Psychology, 14, 6-16.
22. Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals (pp. 141-172). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Embretson, S. E. (1992). Measuring and validating cognitive modifiability as an ability: A study in the spatial domain. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 25-50.
24. Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
25. Feuerstein, R., Miller, R., Hoffman, M. B., Rand, Y., Mintzker, Y., & Jensen, M. R. (1981). Cognitive modifiability in adolescence: Cognitive structure and the effects of intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 15, 269-287.
26. Feuerstein, R., & Schur, Y. (1997). Process as content in regular education and in particular in education of the low functioning retarded performer. In A. L. Costa & R. M. Liebmann (Eds.), Envisioning process as content: Toward a renaissance curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Glass, G. V., McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339-355). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 75-111.
30. Hamers, J. H. M., Hessels, M. G., & Pennings, A. H. (1996). Learning potential in ethnic minority children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 183-192.
31. Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, 411-422.
32. Hayes, A. F. (1998). Within study meta-analysis: Pooling the significance of doubly nonindependent (nonoverlapping) correlations. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 32-45.
33. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Statistical considerations. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 29-38). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
34. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
36. Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1993). Dynamic testing as a compensatory testing approach: A description and analysis. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 14, 6-18.
37. Kalain, H. A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1996). A multivariate linear model for metaanalysis. Psychological Methods, 1(3), 227-235.
38. Kirschembaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with undeserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 40-47.
39. Laughon, P. (1990). The dynamic assessment of intelligence: A review of three approaches. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 459-470.
40. Lidz, C. S. (1996). Dynamic assessment approaches. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford Press.
41. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
42. Missiuna, C., & Samuels, M. T. (1988). Dynamic testing: Review and critique. Special Services in the Schools, 5, 1-22.
43. Palincsar, A., Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1991). Dynamic assessment. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 79-95). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
44. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file-drawer" problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
45. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 232-260). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46. SAS Institute (1997). SAS/STAT software. Changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC: Author.
47. Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & Kibler, J. M. (1990). Dynamic testing, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 113-127.
48. Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
49. Worman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 97-110). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50. Bethge, H., Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992). The effects of dynamic assessment procedures on Raven Matrices performance, visual search behavior, test anxiety, and test orientation. Intelligence, 6, 89-97.
51. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(4), 164-171.
52. Budoff, M., & Corman, L. (1974). Demograohic and psychometric factors related to improved performance on the Kohs Learning-Potential Procedure. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78(5), 578-585.
53. Budoff, M., & Corman, L. (1976). Effectiveness of a learning potential procedure in improving problem-solving skills of retarded and nonretarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(3), 260-264.
54. Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). "Learning potential" as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(5), 434-439.
55. Budoff, M., & Hamilton, J. L. (1976). Optimizing test performance of moderately and severely mentally retarded adolescents and adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(1), 49-57.
56. Budoff, M., Meskin, J., & Harrison, R. H. (1971). Educational test of the learning-potential hypothesis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76(2), 159-169.
57. Carlson, J. S., & Dillon, R. (1978). Measuring intellectual capabilities of hearingimpaired children: Effects of testing-the-limits procedures. The Volta Review, 80(4), 216-224.
58. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1978). Use of testing-the-limits procedures in the assessment of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82(6), 559-564.
59. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing the limits employing the Raven Matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
60. Cormier, P., Carlson, J. S., & Das, J. P. (1990). Planning ability and cognitive performance: The compensatory effects of a dynamic assessment approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(4), 437-449.
61. Day, J. D., & Cordon, L. A. (1993). Static and dynamic measures of ability: An experimental comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 75-82.
62. Day, J. D., Engelhardt, J. L., Maxwell, S. E., & Bolig, E. E. (1997). Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 258-268.
63. Dillon, R., & Carlson, J. S. (1978). Testing for competence in three ethnic groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 437-443.
64. Embretson, S. E. (1987). Improving the measurement of spatial aptitude by dynamic testing. Intelligence, 11, 333-358.
65. Huberty, T. J., & Koller, J. R. (1984). A test of the learning potential hypothesis with hearing and deaf students. Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 22-28.
66. Kar, B. C., Dash, U. N., Das, J. P., & Carlson, J. S. (1993). Two experiments on the dynamic assessment of planning. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 13-29.
67. Keane, K. J., & Kretschmer, R. E. (1987). Effect of mediated learning intervention on cognitive task performance with a deaf population. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 49-53.
68. Larson, G. E., Alderton, D. L., & Kaupp, M. A. (1991). Dynamic administration of a general intelligence test. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(2), 123-134.
69. Missiuna, C., & Samuels, M. T. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 53-62.
70. Peña, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A non-biased procedure. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 269-280.
71. Spector, J. E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 353-363.
72. Swanson, H. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 473-488.
73. Swanson, H. L. (1994). The role of working memory and dynamic assessment in the classification of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9(4), 190-202.
74. Swanson, H. L. (1995). Effects of dynamic testing on the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminate validity of the Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 204-229.
75. Swanson, H. L. (1996). Individual and age-related differences in children's working memory. Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 70-82.
76. Swanson, H. L., Ashbaker, M. H., & Lee, C. (1996). Learning-disabled readers' working memory as a function of processing demands. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 242-275.
77. Tzuriel, D., & Caspi, N. (1992). Cognitive modifiability and cognitive performance of deaf and hearing preschool children. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 235-252.
78. Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). The assessment of analogical thinking Modifiability among readers, special education, disadvantaged, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(4), 539-552.
79. Wurtz, R. G., Sewell, T., & Manni, J. L. (1985). The relationship of estimated learning potential to performance on a learning task and achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 293-302.