The use of dynamic assessment by educational psychologists in the UK

Educational Psychology in Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 311-331

  Deutsch, Ruth ^a   Reynolds, Yvonne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012724324     PISSN: 02667363     EISSN: 14695839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713666083     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BIRNBAUM, R., and DEUTSCH, R., 1996. The use of Dynamic Assessment and its relationship to the Code of Practice: working across boundaries. Annual Course Proceedings, DECP. Educational and Child Psychology, 13(3): 14–24.
2. BUCKINGHAM, B.R., 1921. Intelligence and its measurement: a symposium. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12: 271–275.
3. BUDOFF, M., and CORMAN, L., 1976. Effectiveness of a learning potential procedure in improving problem-solving skills of retarded and non-retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(3): 260–264.
4. CAMPIONE, J., BROWN, S., FERRARA, A., and BRYANT, N., 1984. “ The zone of proximal development: implications for individual differences and learning ”. In New Directions for Child Development: children's learning in the Zone of Proximal Development, Edited by: ROGOFF, B., and WERTSCH, J., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. CARLSON, J.S., and WIEDL, B.R., 1980. Applications of a dynamic testing approach in intelligence assessment: empirical results and theoretical formulations. Seitshrift für Differeutielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1(4): 303–318.
6. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1999. From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: a review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils' thinking, Research Report RR115 London: Department for Education and Employment.
7. FEUERSTEIN, R., 1979. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: the learning potential assessment device: theory, instruments and techniques, Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
8. FEUERSTEIN, R., and FEUERSTEIN, S., 1991. “ Mediated learning experience: a theoretical review ”. In Mediated Learning Experience: theoretical, psychological and learning implications, Edited by: FEUERSTEIN, R., KLEIN, P., and TANNENBAUM, A., Israel: ICELP.
9. FEUERSTEIN, R., HAYWOOD, H.C., HOFFMAN, M.B., and JENSEN, A.R., 1986. Learning Potential Assessment Device Manual, Israel: HWCRI.
10. GUTHKE, J., 1995. “ Recent research evidence on the validity of learning tests ”. In Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Edited by: CARLSON, J., Vol. 3, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. (Chapter 3)
11. GUTHKE, J., and WINGERFELD, S., 1992. “ The learning test concept: origins, state of the art and trends ”. In Interactive Assessment, Edited by: HAYWOOD, H.C., and TZURIEL, D., New York: Springer.
12. HAYWOOD, H.C., 1992. Interactive Assessment. Journal of Special Education, 26(3): 233–234.
13. HAYWOOD, H.C., and TZURIEL, D., eds. 1992. Interactive Assessment, New York: Springer.
14. IMICH, A., 1999. Educational psychologists and the allocation of time. Educational Psychology in Practice, 15(2): 89–97.
15. KAHN, R., 1992. The Dynamic Assessment of Infants and Toddlers, Hartford Court Family Development Resource Centre.
16. LlDZ, C., 1987. Dynamic Assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, New York: Guildford Press.
17. LlDZ, C., 1991. Practitioners Guide to Dynamic Assessment, New York: Guildford Press.
18. MlSSIUANA, C., and SAMUELS, M., 1988. Dynamic Assessment: review and critique. Special Services in the Schools, 5(1,2): 1–22.
19. PAOUR, J.L., 1992a. “ Piagetian approaches to mental retardation: hopes, barriers, opportunities and convergences ”. In Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Edited by: CARLSON, J., Vol. A, 87–111. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20. PAOUR, J.L., 1992b. “ Induction of logic structures in the mentally retarded: an assessment and intervention instrument ”. In Interactive Assessment, Edited by: HAYWOOD, H.C., and TZURIEL, D., New York: Springer.
21. STRINGER, P., ELLIOT, J., and LAUCHLAN, F., 1997. Dynamic Assessment and its potential for educational psychologists. Part 2: the zone of next development?. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12: 152–160.
22. THOMSON, L., 1998. A national survey of Scottish educational psychologists: work practices and perceptions. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14(3): 156–166.
23. TZURIEL, D., 1992. The Dynamic Assessment approach: a reply to Frisby & Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26(3): 302–324.
24. TZURIEL, D., 1997a. “ The relation between parent-child MLE interactions and children's cognitive modifiability ”. In The Ontology of Cognitive Modifiability, Edited by: KOZULIN, A., Israel: ICELP.
25. TZURIEL, D., 1997b. A novel dynamic assessment approach for young children: major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4): 83–108.
26. USMANI, K., 1999. The influence of racism and cultural bias in the assessment of bilingual children. Educational and Child Psychology, 16(3): 44–54.
27. VYGOTSKY, L.S., 1986. Thought and Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.