Automatic calibration of groundwater models using global optimization techniques;Calage automatique de modèles d'écoulement souterrain utilisant des techniques d'optimisation globales

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 879-894

  Solomatine, D P ^a   Dibike, Y B ^a   Kukuric, N ^b  

^a UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; RANDOM PROCESSES;

GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION METHOD;

HYDROLOGY;

CALIBRATION; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING;

EID: 0033384302     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626669909492287     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ali, M. M., and Storey, C., 1994a. Modified controlled random search algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Math., 53:229–235.
2. Ali, M. M., and Storey, C., 1994b. Topographical multilevel single linkage. J. Global Optimiz., 5:349–358.
3. Back, T., and Schwefel, H.-P., 1993. An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evolutionary Comput., 1 (1):1–23.
4. Brent, R. P., 1973. Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey, USA:Prentice-Hall.
5. Carrera, J., and Neumann, S. P., 1986. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions. 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information. 2. Uniqueness, stability and solution algorithms. 3. Applications of synthetic and field data. Wat. Resour:Res., 22 (2):228–242. 199–210, 222–227
6. Carrera, J., 1988. “ State of the art of the inverse problem applied to the flow and solute transport equations ”. In Groundwater Flow and Quality Modelling Edited by:Custodio, E., 549–583. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.:D. Reidel Publ. Company.
7. Cieniawski, S. E., Eheart, J. W., and Ranjithan, S., 1995. Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiobjective groundwater monitoring problem. Wat. Resour. Res., 31 (2):399–409.
8. Dawdy, D. R., and O'Donnell, T., 1965. Mathematical models of catchment behaviour. J. Hydravl. Div. ASCE, 91:123–137. (HY4)
9. Dixon, L. C. W., and Szego, G. P., eds. Towards Global Optimization. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:North-Holland.
10. Franchini, M., and Galeati, G., 1997. Comparing several genetic algorithm schemes for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci. J., 42 (3):357–379.
11. Goldberg, D. E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, Massachusetts, USA:Addison-Wesley.
12. Hemker, C. J., 1997. “ Reliability of parameters in automatic calibration (in Dutch). ”. In Model Calibration, Proc. Conf. Nederlandse Hydrologishe Vereniging), Special issue no. 2.
13. Huyakorn, P. S., and Pinder, G. F., 1983. Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow. New York, USA:Academic Press.
14. Jacobs, D. A. H., 1977. The State of The Art in Numerical Analysis. London, UK:Academic Press.
15. Johnston, P. R., and Pilgrim, D. H., 1976. Parameter optimization for watershed models. Wat. Resour. Res., 12 (3):477–486.
16. Kuczeta, G., 1997. Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Wat. Resour. Res., 33 (1):177–185.
17. Michalewicz, Z., 1996. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Berlin, Germany.:Springer-Verlag.
18. Model Calibration. 1997. Nederlandse Hydrologishe Vereniging (in Dutch). Proc. Model Calibration Conference of the Dutch Hydrological Society. Special issue no. 2
19. Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R. A., 1965. Simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J., 7 (4):308–313.
20. Neumaier, A., 1997. http://solon.cma.univie.ac.at/∼neum/glopt.html.
21. Olsthoorn, T. N., 1995. Effective parameter optimization for groundwater model calibration. Ground Water, 33:42–48.
22. Peck, A., Gorelick, S., de Marsily, G., Foster, S., and Kovalevsky, V., 1988. Consequences of Spatial Variability in Aquifer Properties and Data Limitations for Groundwater Modelling Practice. IAHS Publ. no. 175.
23. Pintér, J., 1995. Global Optimization in Action. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:Kluwer.
24. Powell, M. J. D., 1964. An efficient method of finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Computer J., 7:155–162.
25. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T., 1990. Numerical Recipes in Pascal. The Aft of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
26. Price, W. L., 1983. Global optimization by controlled random search. J. Optimiz. Theory Appl., 40:333–348.
27. Rosenbrock, H. H., 1960. An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Comput. J., 3:175–184.
28. Scientific Software Group. 1996. Product Guide. Washington, USA:Scientific Software Group. See also www.scisoftware.com.
29. Solomatine, D. P., 1995. “ The use of global random search methods for model calibration. ”. In Proc. XXVIth Congress of UHR (London, September 1995) Vol. 1, 224–229. London, UK:Thomas Telford Ltd.
30. Solomatine, D. P., 1996. “ Architectures of hydroinformatics systems:pressures form optimization and automatic calibration problems. ”. In Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics (Zurich, 9–13 September 1996) 455–460. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.:Balkema.
31. Solomatine, D. P., 1998. “ Genetic and other global optimization algorithms—comparison and use in calibration problems. ”. In Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics (Copenhagen, 24–26 August 1998). Rotterdam, The Netherlands.:Balkema.
32. Solomatine, D. P., 1999. Two strategies of adaptive cluster covering with descent and their comparison to other algorithms. J. Global Optima., 14 (1):55–78.
33. Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., and Gupta, V., 1993. Calibration of rainfall-runoff models:application of global optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model. Wat. Resour. Res., 29 (4):1185–1194.
34. Töm, A., and Žilinskas, A., 1989. Global Optimization. Berlin, Germany.:Springer-Verlag.
35. Törn, A., and Viitanen, S., 1994. Topographical Global Optimization using pre-sampled points. J. Global Optimiz., 5:267–276.
36. TRIWACO Groundwater modelling system. 1992. Manual for Version 6.0. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.:IWACO.
37. Van den Boogaard, H. F. P., Hoogkamer, M. J. J., and Heemink, A. W., 1993. Parameter identification in particle models. Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraul., 7:109–130.
38. Wang, Q. J., 1991. The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Wat. Resour. Res., 27 (9):2467–2471.
39. Yeh, W. W., 1986. Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology:the inverse problem. Wat. Resour. Res., 22 (2):95–108.
40. Zaadnoordijk, W. J., 1990. An analytic element model of Goeree compared with a finite element model. Poster paper for Model Care 90 The Hague, The Netherlands).:Conf. on Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling (RIVM/IAHS.
41. Zaadnoordijk, W. J., and Stein, A., 1997. “ Objective function and parameters. ”. In Proc. Model Calibration Conf. of the Dutch Hydrological Society, 21 38. Special issue no. 2 Nederlandse Hydrologishe Vereniging (in Dutch)