Information and economic interdependence

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 54-71

  Reed, William ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian probit; Conflict; Economic interdependence; Militarized dispute; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037284505     PISSN: 00220027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022002702239511     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert, James A., and Siddartha Chib. 1993. Bayesian analysis of binary and polytomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:669-79.
2. Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm. 1995. American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroscedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science 39:1055-82.
3. Barbieri, Katherine, and Gerald Schneider. 1999. Globalization and peace: Assessing new directions in the study of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36:387-404.
4. Bebchuk, Lucian Ary. 1984. Litigation and settlement under imperfect information. Rand Journal of Economics 15:404-15.
5. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan M. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Beyond ordinary logit: Taking time seriously in binary time-series cross-section models. American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-88.
6. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 2001. Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. American Journal of Political Science 45:951-67.
7. Carlin, Bradley P., and Thomas A. Lewis. 1996. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. London: Champman and Hall.
8. Clark, David H., and Timothy Nordstrom. 2001. Modeling uncertainty: Resolving misspecification and selection bias in international conflict research. Mimeograph, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY.
9. _, 2002. Risky inference: Unobserved treatment effects in conflict studies. Mimeograph, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY.
10. Clarke, Kevin. 2001. The effect of priors on approximate Bayes factors from MCMC output. Mimeograph, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
11. _. 2003. Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 72-93.
12. Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney Burrel, Robert Kann, Maurice Lee, Martin Lichterman, Raymond Lindgren, Francis Loewenheim, and Richard van Wagenen. 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Downs, George W., and David M. Rocke. 1979. Interpreting heteroscedasticity. American Journal of Political Science 23:816-28.
14. Fearon, James D. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49:379-414.
15. Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant we all just get along? Opportunity, willingness, and the origins of the democratic peace. American Journal of Political Science 42:1-27.
16. Gartzke, Erik, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer. 2001. Investing in the peace: Economic interdependence and international conflict. International Organization 55:391-438.
17. Gelman, Andrew, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, and Donald B. Rubin. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. London: Champan and Hall.
18. Gill, Jeff, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2002. Assessing the impact of education public policies: A Bayesian random effects model of resource allocation. Mimeograph, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
19. Jackman, Simon. 2000a. Estimation and inference are missing data problems: Unifying social science statistics via Bayesian simulation. Political Analysis 8:307-32.
20. _. 2000b. Estimation and inference via Bayesian simulation: An introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo. American Journal of Political Science 44:369-98.
21. Jones, Daniel, Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:163-213.
22. King, Gary, Ori Rosen, and Martin A. Tanner. 1999. Binomial-beta hierarchical models for ecological inference. Sociological Research and Methods 28:61-90.
23. Lemke, Douglas. 2002. Regions of war and peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lemke, Douglas, and William Reed. 1996. Regime types and status quo evaluations: Power transition theory and the democratic peace. International Interactions 22:143-64.
25. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce M. Russett. 1993. Normative and structural causes of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 87:624-38.
26. Martin, Andrew D. 2002. Bayesian inference for heterogenous event counts. Mimeograph, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
27. Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2000. An integrated computational model of multiparty electoral competition. Mimeograph, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
28. Martin, Lisa 2002. Democratic commitments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Morrow, James D. 1989. Capabilities, uncertainty, and resolve: A limited information model of crisis bargaining. American Journal of Political Science 33:941-72.
30. Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1997. The classic liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 4:267-94.
31. _. 1999a. Assessing the liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36:423-32.
32. _. 1999b. Is the liberal peace just an artifact of cold war interests? Assessing recent critiques. International Interactions 25:1-29.
33. _. 1999c. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992. World Politics 52:1-37.
34. _. 2001. Clear and clean: The fixed effects of democracy and economic interdependence. International Organization 55:469-85.
35. Polachek, Solomon W., John Robst, and Yuan-Chin Chang. 1999. Liberalism and interdependence: Extending the trade-conflict model. Journal of Peace Research 36:405-22.
36. Quinn, Kevin M., Andrew D. Martin, and Andrew B. Whitford. 1999. Voter choice in multi-party democracies: A test of competing theories and models. American Journal of Political Science 43:1231-47.
37. Reed, William, and Wonjae Hwang. 2002. Endogenous demands and conflict onset. Mimeograph, Rice University, Houston, TX.
38. Reiter, Dan. 2001. The bargaining model of war. Mimeograph, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
39. Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
40. Schofield, Norman J., Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Andrew B. Whitford. 1998. Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on multinomial probit. Public Choice 97:257-93.
41. Schultz, Kenneth. 1999. Do democratic institutions constrain or inform? International Organization 53:233-66.
42. Smith, Alastair. 1999. Testing theories of strategic choice: The example of crisis escalation. American Journal of Political Science 43:1254-83.
43. Ward, Michael D., and Kristian S. Gleditsch. 2001. Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis 10:244-60.
44. Werner, Suzanne. 2000. Deterring intervention: The stakes of war and third-party involvement. American Journal of Political Science 44:720-32.
45. Western, Bruce. 1998. Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach. American Journal of Political Science 42:1233-59.
46. Western, Bruce, and Simon Jackman. 1994. Bayesian inference for comparative research. American Political Science Review 88:412-23.
47. Wittman, Donald. 2001. War or peace? Paper presented at the Political Economy of Conflict Conference, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
48. Yatchew, Adonis, and Zvi Griliches. 1985. Specification error in probit models. Review of Economics and Statistics 18:135-39.