Clear and clean: The fixed effects of the liberal peace

International Organization

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 469-485

  Oneal, John R ^a,b   Russett, Bruce ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b Norwegian Nobel Institute   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035628774     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/00208180151140649     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 2001. Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon. International Organization 55 (2):487-95.
2. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260-88.
3. Becketti, Sean. 1993. A Suite of Programs for Time Series Regression. Stata Technical Bulletin 15:20-28. College Station, Tex.: Stata Corporation.
4. Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan C. Stam. 2000. Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads: When Decisions Matter. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (5):653-85.
5. Bliss, Harry, and Bruce Russett. 1998. Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962-1989. Journal of Politics 60 (4):1126-47.
6. Bremer, Stuart A. 1992. Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2):309-41.
7. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
8. Burkhart, Ross E., and Michael S. Lewis-Beck. 1994. Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis. American Political Science Review 88 (4):903-10.
9. Deardorff, Alan V. 1995. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? NBER Working Paper No. 5377. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. Diehl, Paul F., and Gary Goertz. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Diggle, Peter J., Kung-Yee Liang, and Scott L. Zeger. 1994. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Farber, Henry S., and Joanne Gowa. 1997. Common Interests or Common Polities? Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace. Journal of Politics 59 (2):393-417.
13. Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1):1-27.
14. Gowa, Joanne. 1999. Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
15. Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica 37 (3):424-38.
16. Green, Donald P., Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon. Dirty Pool. International Organization 55 (2):441-68.
17. Hegre, Håvard. 2000. Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does It Take to Be a Trading State? Journal of Peace Research 37 (1):5-30.
18. Hegre, Håvard, and Soo Yeon Kim. 2000. Conquest or Commerce? Statecraft in the Age of Interdependence. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, Calif.
19. Heldt, Birger. 1999. Domestic Politics, Absolute Deprivation, and the Use of Armed Force in Interstate Territorial Disputes, 1850-1990. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (4):451-78.
20. Hensel, Paul, Gary Goertz, and Paul Diehl. 2000. The Democratic Peace and Rivalries. Journal of Politics 64 (4):1173-88.
21. Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr. 1996. Polity III Data. May. Available at 〈http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/whmoore/polity/polity.html〉.
22. Kant, Immanuel. [1795] 1970. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Reprinted in Kant's Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. King, Gary. 2001. Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data. International Organization 55 (2):497-507.
24. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305-22.
25. Maoz, Zeev. 1998. Realist and Cultural Critiques of the Democratic Peace: A Theoretical and Empirical Re-Assessment. International Interactions 24 (1):3-89.
26. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. 1993. Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87 (3):624-38.
27. Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson, and Tressa E. Tabares. 1998. The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907-90. American Political Science Review 92 (3):649-62.
28. Mousseau, Michael. 2000. Market Prosperity. Democratic Consolidation, and Democratic Peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4):472-507.
29. Oneal, John R., and James Lee Ray. 1997. New Tests of the Democratic Peace Controlling for Economic Interdependence, 1950-1985. Political Research Quarterly 50 (4):751-76.
30. Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict. 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):267-94.
31. _. 1999a. Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4):423-32.
32. _. 1999b. Is the Liberal Peace Just an Artifact of Cold War Interests? Assessing Recent Critiques. International Interactions 25 (3):213-41.
33. _. 1999c. The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1886-1992. World Politics 52 (1):1-37.
34. _. 2000. Causes of Peace, 1886-1992: Distributed-Lags Models of Conflict and Trade. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Peace Science Society (International), New Haven, Conn.
35. Oneal, John R., Frances H. Oneal, Zeev Maoz, and Bruce Russett. 1996. The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-1985. Journal of Peace Research 33 (1):11-28.
36. Russett, Bruce. 1995. And Yet It Moves. International Security 19 (4):164-75.
37. Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
38. Schultz, Kenneth. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. StataCorp. 1999. Stata Statistical Software, rel. 6.0. College Station, Tex.: Stata Corporation.