Reflective critique and collaborative practice in evaluation: Promoting change in medical education

Medical Teacher

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 82-88

  Spratt, Christine ^a   Walls, Justin ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PEDAGOGICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FOCUS GROUPS; PHARMACOLOGY; TASMANIA;

EID: 0037239867     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000061477     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANDERSON, M.B. (2000) A Guide to the 130 Reports in the Snapshot Supplement to Academic Medicine, Academic Medicine, 75, b [http: www.academicmedicine.org/cgi/content/full/75/9/0-b, accessed 6 August 2002].
2. ANTEPOHL, W., & HERZIG, S. (1999) Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: a controlled, randomised study, Medical Education, 33(2), pp. 106-113.
3. AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL COUNCIL (2001), Response to the University of Tasmania School of Medicine Accreditation Review Submission (Kingston, ACT, Australian Medical Council).
4. AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL WORKFORCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (AMWAC) (2000) Innovations in medical education to meet workforce challenges, Australian Health Review, 23(4), pp. 43-59.
5. BIGGS, J.B. (1999) What the learner does: teaching for enhanced learning, Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), pp. 57-75.
6. BROWN, A.L., COLLINS, A. & DUGUID, P. (1999) Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18 (1), pp. 32-42.
7. EDELSTEIN, R.A., REID, H.M., USATINE, R. & WILKES, M. (2000), A comparative study of measures to evaluate medical students' performance, Academic Medicine, 75(8), pp. 825-833.
8. ELLWORTH, E. (1997) Teaching Positions: Difference, Pedagogy and the Power of Address (New York, Teachers College Press).
9. FRIEDMAN BEN-DAVID, M. (2000) The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons, Medical Teacher, 22(2), pp. 472-477.
10. FINUCANE, P. JOHNSON, S. & PRIDEAUX, D. (1998) Problem-based learning: its rationale and efficacy, Medical Journal of Australia, 168(9), pp. 445-448.
11. GREEN, B. (1998), Teaching for difference: learning theory and post-critical pedagogy, in: D. BUCKINGHAM (Ed.) Teaching Popular Culture: Beyond Radical Pedagogy, pp. 176-197 (London, UCL Press).
12. GUBA, E.G. & LINCOLN, Y.S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications).
13. GUBA, E.G. & LINCOLN, Y.S. (2001) Guidelines and Checklist for Constructivist (a.k.a. Fourth Generation) Evaluation [http://www. umich.edu/evalctr/checklists/constructivisteval.pdf, accessed 8 August 2002].
14. HENDRY, G., CUMMING, R., LYON, P. & GORDON, J. (2001) Student-centred evaluation in a four-year, problem-based medical programme: issues in collection and management of feedback, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), pp. 327-339.
15. LAURILLARD, D. (1995) Rethinking University Teaching: a Framework for the effective Use of Educational Technology (London, Routledge).
16. MARTON, F., HOUNSELL, D. & ENTWHISTLE, N. (1997) The Experience of Learning. Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education (Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press).
17. MAUDSLEY, G. (2001) What issues are raised by evaluating problem-based undergraduate medical curricula? Making healthy connections across the literature, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(3), pp. 311-324.
18. MCPHERSON, R., JONES, A., WHITEHOUSE, C.R. & O'NEILL, P.A. (2001) Small groups learning in the final year of a medical degree: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation, Medical Teacher, 23(5), pp. 494-502.
19. RAMSDEN, P. (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education (London: Routledge).
20. ROBINS, L., WHITE, C. & FANTONE, J. (2000) The difficulty of sustaining curricular reforms: a study of drift: in one school, Academic Medicine, 75(8), pp. 801-805.
21. SCHÖN, D. (1998) The new scholarship requires a new epistemology, Change, November-December, pp. 27-34.
22. SPRATT, C., PALMER, S. & COLDWELL, J. (2000) Using technologies in teaching: an initiative in academic staff development, Educational Technology and Society [http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/ issues.html, accessed 8 July 2002].
23. STEINERT, Y. (2000) Faculty development in the new millennium: key challenges and future directions, Medical Teacher, 22(1), pp. 44-50.
24. WALKER, R. (2001) Case study, case records and multimedia, Centre for Applied Research in Education (Norwich, University of East Anglia) [http://www.uea.ac.uk/care/people/RW_recent_writing/ final_14_09.html, accessed 8 July 2002].
25. WEBB, G. (1996) Understanding Staff Development (Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
26. WILKES, M. (1999) Evaluating educational interventions, British Medical Journal, 7193, pp. 1269-1272.