Special issue introduction: Defining the domain of workplace diversity scholarship

Group and Organization Management

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-17

  Konrad, Alison M ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business case for diversity; Intergroup power relations; Trait model of diversity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037229963     PISSN: 10596011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059601102250013     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515.
2. Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836.
3. Benokraitis, N. V. (Ed.). (1997). Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Bobo, L. (1998). Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 985-1003.
5. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22.
6. Cox, T., Jr., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
7. Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
8. Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1576.
9. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 105-153). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10. Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
11. Fiol, C. M. (1994). Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5, 403-420.
12. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Holzer, H. J. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York: Russell Sage.
14. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
15. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
16. Jacobs, J. A. (1999). The sex segregation of occupations: Prospects for the 21 st century. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 125-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Jacques, R. (1997). The unbearable Whiteness of being: Reflections of a place, stale male. In P. Prasad, A. J. Mills, M. Elmes, & A. Prasad (Eds.), Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity (pp. 80-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Johnston, W. B., & Packer, A. H. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers in the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
19. Jones, D., Pringle, J., & Shepherd, D. (2000). "Managing diversity" meets Aotearoa/New Zealand. Personnel Review, 29, 364-380.
20. Kalkhoff, W., & Barnum, C. (2000). The effects of status-organizing and social identity processes on patterns of social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 95-115.
21. Kerckhoff, A. C. (1995). Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 323-347.
22. Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1983), An influence perspective of bargaining within organizations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal, 38, 787-820.
24. Konrad, A. M., & Pfeffer, J. (1991). Understanding the hiring of women and minorities in educational institutions. Sociology of Education, 64, 141-157.
25. Linnehan, F., & Konrad, A. M. (1999). Diluting diversity: Implications for intergroup inequality in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 399-414.
26. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
27. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
28. Prasad, P. (1997). The Protestant ethic and the myths of the frontier: Cultural imprints, organizational structuring, and workplace diversity. In P. Prasad, A. J. Mills, M. Elmes, & A. Prasad (Eds.), Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity (pp. 129-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Prasad, P., Mills, A. J., Elmes, M., & Prasad, A. (Eds.). (1997). Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72, 1051-1077.
32. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21-31.
33. Rowe, M. P. (1990). Barriers to equality: The power of subtle discrimination to maintain unequal opportunity. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 153-163.
34. Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.
37. Society for Human Resource Management. (1997). SHRM Survey of diversity programs. Alexandria, VA: Author.
38. Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364-373.
39. Tolbert, P. S., Graham, M. E., & Andrews. A. O. (1999). Group gender composition and work group relations: Theories, evidence, and issues. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 179-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Turner, S. C. (1997). Barriers to a better break: Employer discrimination and spatial mismatch in metropolitan Detroit. Journal of urban Affairs, 19, 123-141.
41. Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R. M., & John, O. P. (1999). Introduction: What does studying the psychology of the social self have to offer to psychologists? In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 1-10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
43. Webster, M., Jr., & Hysom, S. J. (1998). Creating status characteristics. American Sociological Review, 63, 351-378.
44. Wharton, A. S. (1992). Alternative approaches to the examination of demography in organizations. In P. Tolbert & S. B. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 10, pp. 55-84). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
45. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20. pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.