Methods for evidence synthesis in interventional pain management

Pain Physician

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 89-111

  Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ^a   Heavner, James E ^b   Racz, Gabor B ^b   Mekhail, Nagy ^c   Schultz, David M ^d   Hansen, Hans C ^e   Singh, Vijay ^f  

^a PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER OF PADUCAH   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e The Pain Relief Centers   (United States)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Interventional pain management; Levels of evidence; Narrative reviews; Observational trials; Quality of evidence; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

STEROID;

ANALGESIA; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIENCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD SURGERY; SPINAL GANGLION; SPINAL PAIN; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE;

EID: 0037226612     PISSN: 15333159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (236)

1. Haynes RB, Sackett RB, Gray JMA et al. Transferring evidence from research into practice, 1: the role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. ACP J Club, 1996; 125A:14-15.
2. Guyatt GH, Rennie D. User's Guides to the Medical Literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. AMA Press, Chicago, 2002.
3. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club 1991; 114:A-16.
4. Evidence-based medicine working group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to the teaching of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268:2420-2425.
5. Manchikanti L. Evidence-based interventional pain medicine: Is there any evidence? Pain Physician 2002; 5:1-7.
6. McQuay H, Moore A (eds). An evidence-based resource for pain relief. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
7. Hatala R, Guyatt G. Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medcine. JAMA 2002; 288:1110-1112.
8. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Kloth D et al. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic pain: Part 2.0. Pain Physician 2001; 4:24-96.
9. www.Cochrane.org.
10. Bigos SJ, Boyer OR, Braen GR et al. Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 4. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, December 1994.
11. Gonzalez EG, Materson (eds). The nonsurgical management of acute low back pain. Demos Vermane, New York 1997.
12. Spitzer WO, Leblanc FE, Dupuis M (eds). Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: A monograph for clinicians. Spine 1987; (suppl) 12:1-59.
13. Bogduk N. International Spinal Injection Society guidelines for the performance of spinal injection procedures. Part 1: Zygapophyseal joint blocks. Clin J Pain 1997; 13:285-302.
14. Campbell JK, Penzien DB, Wall EM. Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache: Behavorial and physical treatments. 2000. Available at: http://www.aan.com/public/practiceguidelines/headache_gl.htm.
15. American Pain Society. Guideline for the management of acute and chronic pain in sickle-cell disease. American Pain Society, Glenview, 1999.
16. American Geriatrics Society. The management of chronic pain in older persons: New guidelines from the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 128-150.
17. Sanders SH, Rucker KS, Anderson KO et al. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients. J Back Musc Rehabil 1995; 5:115-120.
18. Sanders SH, Harden RN, Benson SE et al. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients II: An evidence-based approach. J Back Musc Rehabil 1999; 13:47-58.
19. Nelemans PJ, Debie RA, DeVet HC et al. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low back pain. Spine 2001; 26:501-515.
20. Geurts JW, van Wijk RM, Stalker RJ et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency procedures for the treatment of spinal pain: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26:394-400.
21. Kepes ER, Duncalf D. Treatment of backache with spinal injections of local anesthetics, spinal and systemic steroids. Pain 1985; 22:33-47.
22. Benzon HT. Epidural steroid injections for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculography. Pain 1986; 24:277.
23. Bogduk N, Christophidis N, Cherry D et al. Epidural use of steroids in the management of back pain. Report of working party on epidural use of steroids in the management of back pain. National Health and Medical Research Council. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 1994, pp 1-76.
24. Bogduk N. Epidural steroids for low back pain and sciatica. Pain Digest 1999; 9: 226-227.
25. Koes BW, Scholten RJPM, Mens JMA et al. Efficacy of epidural steroid injections for low back pain and sciatica: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pain 1995; 63:279-288.
26. Koes BW, Scholten R, Mens JMA et al. Epidural steroid injections for low back pain and sciatica. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pain Digest 1999; 9:241-247.
27. Watts RW, Silagy CA. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of epidural corticosteroids in the treatment of sciatica. Anaesth Intens Care 1995; 23:564-569.
28. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Epidural corticosteroids for sciatica. In An Evidence-Based Resource for Pain Relief. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998; pp 216-218.
29. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders: Redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine 1995; (Suppl) 20:1-73.
30. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management, Chronic Pain Section. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:995-1004.
31. van Tulder M, Malmivarira A, Esmail R et al. Letter to the editor: In reply. Spine 2001; 26:840-844.
32. Manchikanti L, Jasper J, Singh V. Cochrane review is mixing apples and oranges (Itr). Spine 2001; 26:2641-2643.
33. Carrette S, Marcoux S, Truchon R et al. A controlled trial of corticosteroid injections into facet joints for chronic low back pain. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:1002-1007.
34. Carr DB, Goudas LC. Evidence-based pain medicine: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26:389-393.
35. Dreyfuss P, Halbrook B, Pauza K et al. Efficacy and validity of radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Spine 2000; 25:1270-1277.
36. Bogduk N. In defense of radiofrequency neurotomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27:439-447.
37. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Vilims B et al. Medial branch neurotomy in management of chronic spinal pain: Systematic review of the evidence. Pain Physician 2002; 5:405-418.
38. Nachemson AL, Jonsson E (eds). Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000.
39. van Tulder MW, Goossens M, Waddell G et al. Conservative treatment of chronic low back pain. In Nachemson AL, Jonsson E (eds). Neck and Back Pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000, pp 271-304.
40. Bernstein RM. Injections and surgical therapy in chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2001; 17:S94-S104.
41. Curatolo M, Bogduk N. Pharmacologic pain treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: Current perspectives and future prospects. Clin J Pain 2001; 17;25-32.
42. Vroomen PC, De Krom MC, Slofstra PD et al. Conservative treatment of sciatica: A systematic review. J Spin Disord 2000; 13: 463-469.
43. Rozenberg S, Dubourg G, Khalifa P et al. Efficacy of epidural steroids in low back pain and sciatica: A critical appraisal by a French task force of randomized trials. Revue du Rhumatisme 1999; 66:79-85.
44. BenDebba M, Torgerson W, Boyd R et al. Persistent low back pain and sciatica in the United States: Treatment outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002; 15:2-15.
45. Cepeda MS, Lau J, Carr DB. Defining the therapeutic role of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade in complex regional pain syndrome: A narrative and systematic review. Clin J Pain 2002; 18:216-233.
46. Gatchel RJ, McGeary D. Cochrane collaboration-based reviews of health-care interventions: Are they unequivocal and valid scientifically, or simply nihilistic? The Spine Journal 2002; 2:315-319.
47. Olsen O, Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane Review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:1340-1342.
48. Olsen O, Gøtzsche PC. Cochrane Review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Library, issue 4. Update Software, Oxford, 1991.
49. Horton R Screening mammography: An overview revisited. Lancet 2001; 358: 1284-1285.
50. Lee JH, Zuckerman D. Correspondence: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:2164-2165.
51. Miller AB. Correspondence: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:2164.
52. Thornton H. Correspondence: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:2165.
53. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Smith RA. Correspondence: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:2166.
54. Hoving JL, Gross AR, Gasner D. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine 2001; 26:196-205.
55. Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane Reviews. JAMA 2002; 287:2769-2771.
56. Furlan AD, Clarke J, Esmail R et al. A critical review of reviews on the treatment of chronic low back pain. Spine 2001; 26: E155-E162.
57. Balk EM, Bonis PA, Moskowitz H et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2002; 287:2973-2982.
58. Hopayian K. The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews. Br Med J 2001; 323:681-684.
59. Jadad A, McQuay HS. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49:235-243.
60. Gatchel RJ, Matt-Maddrey A. Experimental design issues in clinical research of musculoskeletal pain disabilities. Crit Rev Phys Rehab Med 2000; 12:9-101.
61. Senn S. Correspondence: Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358:2164.
62. Gatchel RJ, Bell G. The biopsychosocial approach to spine care and research. Spine 2000; 25:2561-2571.
63. Turk DC, Gatchel RJ. Psychosocial factors and pain: Revolution and evolution. In Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (eds). Psychological Factors in Pain: Critical Perspectives. Guilford, New York, 1999:481-494.
64. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1887-1892.
65. Feinstein AR. Epidemiologic analyses of causation: the unlearned scientific lessons of randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42:481-489.
66. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878-1886.
67. McKee M, Britton A, Black N et al. Methods in health services research: interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies. BMJ 1999; 319:312-315.
68. Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Clemens JD et al. Developing improved observational methods for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness. Am J Med 1990; 89:630-638.
69. A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA 1982; 247:1707-1714.
70. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis. Am Psychol 1993; 48:1181-1209.
71. Manchikanti L, Pampati V. Research designs in interventional pain management: Is randomization superior, desirable or essential? Pain Physician 2002; 5:275-284.
72. Horwitz RI. Complexity and contradiction in clinical trial research. Am J Med 1987; 82:498-510.
73. Horn KD. Evolving strategies in the treatment of sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). QJM 1998; 91: 265-277.
74. Angus DC, Birmingham MC, Balk RA et al. E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000; 283: 1723-1730.
75. LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A et al. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:536-542.
76. Lefering R, Neugebauer E. Problems of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery. Nonrandomized Comparative Clinical Studies. In Able U, Koch A (eds). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Nonrandomized Comparative Clinical Studies in the International conference on Nonrandomized Comparative Clinical Studies in Heidelberg, Symposium Publishing, April 10-11, 1997. http://www.symposion.com/nrccs/lefering.htm.
77. Bigby M. Challenges of the hierarchy of evidence: Does the emperor have no clothes? Arch Dermatol 2001; 137:345-346.
78. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ et al. Users' guides to the medical literature, XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. JAMA 2000; 284:1290-1296.
79. Fung EK, Lore JM. Randomized controlled trials for evaluating surgical questions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128:631-634.
80. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Haynes RJ et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273:408-412.
81. Chalmers I. Unbiased, relevant and reliable assessments in health care. BMJ 1998; 317:1167-1168.
82. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 141-145.
83. Burton v. Brooklyn Doctors Hosp., 452 N.Y.S. 2d. 875 (N.Y. app. Div. 1982).
84. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. World Medical Association, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
85. Vastag B. Helsinki discord? A controversial declaration. JAMA 2000; 284:2983-2985.
86. Emanuel EJ, Miller FG. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials-A middle ground. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:915-919.
87. Pogue J, Yusuf S. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet 1998; 351: 47-52.
88. Levine RJ. The need to revise declaration of Helsinki. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:531-534.
89. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluation. Lancet 1993; 342:1317-1322.
90. Effective Health Care Bulletin (EHCB) Implementing clinical practice guidelines. Can guidelines be used to improve practice? Effective Health Care Bulletin, No. 6, University of Leeds, UK 1994.
91. Manchikanti L, Rivera J, Pampati V et al. Effectiveness of clinical guidelines in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2002; 5:127-132.
92. A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 1998, pp 1-79.
93. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA 1999; 281:1900-1905.
94. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000; 283:2008-2012.
95. Stroup DF, Thacker SB, Olson CM et al. Characteristics of meta-analyses submitted to a medical journal. From: International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications; September 17-21, 1997; Prague, Czech Republic.
96. Greenland S. Invited commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140:290-296.
97. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Summing up evidence. Lancet 1998; 351:123-127.
98. Shapiro S. Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140:771-778.
99. Berlin JA. Invited commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:383-387.
100. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: A Medical Research Council investigation. BMJ 1948; 2:769-782.
101. Byar DP, Simon RM, Friedewald WT et al. Randomized clinical trials: Perspectives on some recent ideas. N Engl J Med 1976; 295:74-80.
102. Feinstein AR. Current problems and future challenges in randomized clinical trials. Circulation 1984; 70:767-774.
103. Abel U, Koch A. The role of randomization in clinical studies: Myths and beliefs. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52:487-497.
104. Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72:233-240.
105. Kjaergard LK, Als-Nielsen B. Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ 2002; 325:1-4.
106. Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet 2000; 356-635-638.
107. Hopwood MB, Manning DC. Lumbar epidural steroid injections: Is a clinical trial necessary or appropriate? Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24:5-7.
108. Turner JA, Loeser JD, Bell KG. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain. A systematic literature synthesis. Neurosurgery 1995; 37:1088-1098.
109. Weinstein JN. The tortoise and the hare. Is there a place in spine surgery for randomized trials? Spine 1999; 24:2548-2549.
110. Winter RB. The prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial in spine surgery. Fact or fiction? Spine 1999; 24:2550-2552.
111. Fairbank J. Randomized controlled trials in the surgical management of spinal problems. Spine 1999; 24:2556-2561.
112. Tosteson TD. Point of view. Spine 1999; 24:2562-2563.
113. Carey TS. Randomized controlled trials in surgery. An essential component of scientific progress. Spine 1999; 23:2553-2555.
114. Kane RL. Approaching the outcomes question. In Kane RL (ed). Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Aspen Publication, Gaithersburg, 1997, pp 1-15.
115. Daly LE, Bourke GJ. Epidemiological and clinical research methods. In Daly LE, Bourke GJ (eds). Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics. Blackwell Science, 2000, Oxford, pp 143-201.
116. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 University of North Carolina: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016; April 2002.
117. Lohr KN, Carey TS. Assessing 'best evidence': Issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews. Joint Commission J Qual Improvement 1999; 25:470-479.
118. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR et al. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: pp 1-276.
119. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126:376-380.
120. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: State of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:485-488.
121. Clark HD, Wells GA, Huet C et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: Reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 1999; 20:448-452.
122. Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr., Blackburn B et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials 1981; 2:31-49.
123. Hemminki E. Quality of reports of clinical trials submitted by the drug industry to the Finnish and Swedish control authorities. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 19:157-165.
124. Khan KS, Daya S, Jaclad A. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:661-666.
125. How to use the evidence: Assessment and application of scientific evidence. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 2000, pp 1-84.
126. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998; 279:1566-1570.
127. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44:1271-1278.
128. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44:91-98.
129. Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:667-676.
130. Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D et al. Meta-analysis: An update. Mt Sinai J Med 1996; 63:216-224.
131. Auperin A, Pignon JP, Poynard T. Review article: Critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology. Alimentary Pharmacol Ther 1997; 11:215-225.
132. Beck CT. Use of meta-analysis as a teaching strategy in nursing research courses. J Nurs Educ 1997; 36:87-90.
133. Smith AF. An analysis of review articles published in four anesthesia journals. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44:405-409.
134. Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 4.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 1999.
135. Khan KS, ter Riet G, Glanville I et al. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews: York, England: University of York, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2000.
136. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Tools for Guideline Development & Evaluation.
137. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system [Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)] for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001; 323:334-336.
138. de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, van der Heijden GJMG et al. Systematic review on the basis of methodological criteria. Physiotherapy 1997; 83:284-289.
139. Evans M, Pollock AV. A score system for evaluating random control clinical trials of prophylaxis of abdominal surgical wound infection. Br J Surg 1985; 72:256-260.
140. Liberati A, Himel HN, Chalmers TC. A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4:942-951.
141. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical Stat Med 1989; 8:441-454.
142. Gotzsche PC. Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10:31-56.
143. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homeopathy. BMJ 1991; 302:316-323.
144. Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K et al. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:255-265.
145. Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA 1994; 272: 101-104.
146. Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW et al. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:11-21.
147. Fahey T, Hyde C, Milne R et al. The type and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in UK public health journals. J Public Health Med 1995; 17:469-474.
148. Khan KS, Daya S, Collins JA et al. Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: Overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 939-945.
149. van der Heijden GJ, van der Windt DA, Kleijnen J et al. Steroid injections for shoulder disorders: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Brit J Gen Pract 1996; 46:309-316.
150. Bender JS, Halpern SH, Thangaroopan M et al. Quality and retrieval of obstetrical anesthesia randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44:14-18.
151. Sindhu F, Carpenter L, Seers K. Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique. J Adv Nurs 1997; 25: 1262-1268.
152. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997; 22:2128-2156.
153. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:377-384.
154. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A et al. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998; 352:609-613.
155. Turlik MA, Kushner D. Levels of evidence of articles in podiatric medical journals. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000; 90:300-302.
156. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 1996; 17:1-12.
157. DerSimonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B et al. Reporting on methods in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1982; 306:1332-1337.
158. Poynard T, Naveau S, Chaput J. Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials in treatment of portal hypertension. In Methodology and Reviews of Clinical Trials in Portal Hypertension. Excerpta Medica 1987:306-311.
159. Reisch JS, Tyson JE, Mize SG. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies. Pediatrics 1989; 84:815-827.
160. Imperiale TF, McCullough AJ. Do corticosteroids reduce mortality from alcoholic hepatitis? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:299-307.
161. Spitzer WO, Lawrence V, Dales R et al. Links between passive smoking and disease: A best-evidence synthesis. A report of the Working Group on Passive Smoking. Clin Invest Med 1990; 13:17-46.
162. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bier RA et al. The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51:1235-1241.
163. Zaza S, Wright-De Auguero LK et al. Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Servies. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18:44-74.
164. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273:408-412.
165. Prendiville W, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. The effects of routine oxytocic administration in the management of the third stage of labour: An overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:3-16.
166. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:59-63.
167. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1993; 270:2598-2601.
168. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994; 272:1926-1931.
169. The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Checklist of information for inclusion in reports of clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124:741-743.
170. Mohor D, Schutz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1987-1991.
171. Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Zambon A et al. Exploring the dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of several alcohol-related conditions: A meta-analysis. Addiction 1999; 94:1551-1573.
172. Hildebrandt J. Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain - is the quality decisive? Schmerz 2001; 15:474-483.
173. Bogduk N. Low back pain. In Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum, ed 3. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1997; pp 187-214.
174. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ et al. Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain with whiplash: A placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine 1996; 21:1737-1745.
175. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R et al. Clinical features of patients with pain stemming from the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Is the lumbar facet syndrome a clinical entity? Spine 1994; 19:1132-1137.
176. Schwarzer AC, Wang S, Bogduk N et al. Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: A study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain. Am Rheum Dis 1995; 54:100-106
177. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R et al. The relative contributions of the disc and zygapophyseal joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 1994; 19:801-806.
178. Manchikanti L, Pampati VS, Fellows B et al. Prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 1999; 2:59-64.
179. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Fellows B et al. The inability of the clinical picture to characterize pain from facet joints. Pain Physician 2000; 3:158-166.
180. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati VS et al. Evaluation of the relative contributions of various structures in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2001; 4:308-316.
181. Manchikanti L, Pampati VS, Fellows B et al. The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of medial branch blocks with or without adjuvants. Curr Rev Pain 2000 4: 337-344.
182. Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ et al. The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophyseal joint pain after whiplash. Spine 1995; 20:20-26.
183. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Rivera J et al. Prevalence of cervical facet joint pain in chronic neck pain. Pain Physician 2002; 5:243-249.
184. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati VS et al. Evaluation of the prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic thoracic pain. Pain Physician 2002; 5: 354-359.
185. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati VS et al. Is there correlation of facet joint pain in lumbar and cervical spine? An evaluation of prevalence in combined chronic low back and neck pain. Pain Physician 2002; 5:365-371.
186. Manchikanti L, Pampati VS, Fellows B et al. Influence of psychological factors on the ability to diagnose chronic low back pain of facet joint origin. Pain Physician 2001; 4:349-357.
187. Schwarzer AC, Derby R, Aprill CN et al. The value of the provocation response in lumbar zygapophysial joint injections. Clin J Pain 1994; 10:309-313.
188. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R et al. The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Pain 1994; 58:195-200.
189. Barnsley L, Lord S, Wallis B et al. False-positive rates of cervical zygapophysial joint blocks. Clin J Pain 1993; 9:124-130.
190. Barnsley L, Bogduk N. Medial branch blocks are specific for the diagnosis of cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. Reg Anesth 1993 18:343-350.
191. Kaplan M, Dreyfuss P, Halbrook B et al. The ability of lumbar medial branch blocks to anesthetize the zygapophysial joint. Spine 1998; 23:1847-1852.
192. Dreyfuss P, Schwarzer A, Lau P et al. Specificity of lumbar medial branch and L5 dorsal ramus blocks. Spine 1997; 22:895-902.
193. Bogduk N. International Spinal Injection Society guidelines for the performance of spinal injection procedures. Part 1: Zygapophyseal joint blocks. Clin J Pain 1997; 13:285-302.
194. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Fellows B. Structural basis of chronic low back pain. In Manchikanti L, Slipman CW, Fellows B (eds), Interventional Pain Management: Low Back Pain - Diagnosis and Treatment. ASIPP Publishing, Paducah, KY 2002; 77-96.
195. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 1995; 20:31-37.
196. Maigne J, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine 1996; 21: 1889-1892.
197. Fortin JD. Precision diagnostic disc injections. Pain Physician 2000; 3:271-288.
198. Saal JS. General principles of diagnostic testing as related to painful lumbar spine disorders. Spine 2002; 27:2538-2545.
199. Schellhas KP, Smith MD, Gundry CR et al. Cervical discogenic pain. Prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine 1996; 21: 300-312.
200. Wood KB, Schellhas KP, Garvey TA et al. Thoracic discography in health individuals. A controlled prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Spine 1999; 24:1548-1555.
201. Walsh TR, Weinstein JN, Spratt KP et al. Lumbar discography in normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A:1081-1088.
202. Holt EP Jr. The question of lumbar discography. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1968; 50: 720-726.
203. Holt EP Jr. Fallacy of cervical discography. Report of 50 cases in normal subjects. JAMA 1964; 188:799-801.
204. Carragee EJ. Is lumbar discography a determinate of discogenic low back pain: Provocative discography reconsidered. Curr Rev Pain 2000; 4:301-308.
205. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM et al. Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy. A randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine 2000; 25:3065-3071.
206. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine 2000; 25:1373-1381.
207. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo award winner in clinical studies. Lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine 2000; 25:2987-2992.
208. Wetzel FT. Rates of false-positive lumbar discography: Point of view. Spine 2000; 25:1381.
209. Block A, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss D et al. Discographic pain report: Influence of psychological factors. Spine 1996; 1:334-338.
210. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Guyer RD. The association between pain drawings and computed tomographic/discographic pain responses. Spine 1995; 20:729-733.
211. Heggeness MH, Watters WC, Gray PM. Discography of lumbar discs after surgical treatment for disc herniation. Spine 1997; 22:1606-1609.
212. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati VS et al. Provocative discography in low back pain patients with or without somatization disorder: A randomized, prospective evaluation. Pain Physician 2001; 4:227-239.
213. Hildebrandt J. Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain - is the quality decisive? Schmerz 2001; 15: 474-483.
214. Sheps SB, Schechter MT. The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research. JAMA 1984; 252-2418-2422.
215. Arroll B, Schechter MT, Sheps SB. The assessment of diagnostic tests: A comparison of medical literature in 1982 and 1985. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3:443-447.
216. Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller J et al. Provocative discography in volunteer subjects with mild persistent low back pain. The Spine Journal 2002; 2:25-34.
217. Cochrane Methods Working Group on Systematic Review of Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Recommended Methods; 1996.
218. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282-1061-1066.
219. ter Riet G, Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Acupuncture and chronic pain: A criteria-based meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43:1191-1199.
220. Ezzo J, Berman B, Hadhazy V et al. Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 2000; 86:217-225.
221. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48:167-171.
222. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Systematic reviews - identifying relevant studies for systematic review. BMJ 1994; 309:1286-1291.
223. Oxman AD. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook: Preparing and maintaining systematic reviews. Second Edition. Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, 1992.
224. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data (with discussion). J R Statist Soc A 1988; 151: 419-463.
225. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC et al. Publication bias and clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1987; 8:343-353.
226. Deeks J, Glanville J, Sheldon T. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD guidelines for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Report #4, York Publishing Services Ltd, York, 1996.
227. Dickersin K, Cooper H, Hedges LV. Research register. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1994, pp 71-84.
228. Dickersin K, Hewitt P, Mutch L et al. Pursuing the literature: Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database. Controlled Clin Trials 1985; 6:306-317.
229. Smith BJ, Darzins PJ, Quinn M et al. Modern methods of searching the medical literature. Med J Aust 1992; 157:603-611.
230. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 1979; 32:51-63.
231. Chalmers TC, Levin H, Sacks HS. Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials. Stat Med 1987; 6:315-325.
232. Reed JG, Baxter PM, Cooper H et al. Using reference databases. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1994; pp 57-70.
233. Clarke M. Searching MEDLINE for randomized trials. BMJ 1993; 307:565.
234. Adams CE, Power A, Frederick K et al. An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. Psychol Med 1994; 24:741-748.
235. Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993; No. 33.
236. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. The comprehensiveness of MEDLINE and EMBASE computer searches. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1992; 14:316-320.