Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 470-479

  Lohr, K N ^a   Carey, T S ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 0033194558     PISSN: 10703241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30461-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)