Fine mapping in tomato using microsynteny with the Arabidopsis genome: the Diageotropica (Dgt) locus

Genome Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2002, Pages

  Oh, KwangChul ^a   Hardeman, Kristine ^a,b   Ivanchenko, Maria G ^a   Ellard Ivey, Mary ^a,c   Nebenführ, Andreas ^a,d   White, Tj ^a   Lomax, Terri L ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Monsanto Mystic Research   (United States)

^c PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis Genome; Bacterial Artificial Chromosome; Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Clone; Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Library; Cleave Amplify Polymorphic Sequence

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME MAP; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE; GENE ORDER; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOME; METHODOLOGY; NON-PROGRAMMATIC; PLANT CHROMOSOME; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; SYNTENY; TOMATO;

NON-PROGRAMMATIC;

ARABIDOPSIS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE ORDER; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; SYNTENY;

EID: 0037190182     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0049     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bennetzen JL, Freeling M: Grasses as a single genetic system: genome composition, colinearity, and compatibility. Trends Genet. 1993, 9: 259-261. 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90001-X. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90001-X
2. Moore G, Devos KM, Wang Z, Gale MD: Cereal genome evolution. Grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr Biol. 1995, 5: 737-739. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00148-5
3. Schmidt R: Synteny: recent advances and future prospects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000, 3: 97-102. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00048-5. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00048-5
4. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000, 408: 796-815. 10.1038/35048692. DOI: 10.1038/35048692
5. Mysore KS, Tuori RP, Martin GB: Arabidopsis genome sequence as a tool for functional genomics in tomato. Genome Biol. 2001, 2: reviews1003.1-1003.4. 10.1186/gb-2001-2-1-reviews1003. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-1-reviews1003
6. Kowalski SP, Lan T-H, Feldmann KA, Paterson AH: Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization. Genetics. 1994, 138: 499-510.
7. Kilian A, Chen J, Han F, Steffenson B, Kleinhofs A: Towards map-based cloning of the barley stem rust resistance genes Rpg1 and rpg4 using rice as an intergenomic cloning vehicle. Plant Mol Biol. 1997, 35: 187-195. 10.1023/A:1005768222615. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005768222615
8. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, de Vivente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB: High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics. 1992, 132: 1141-1160.
9. Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Blauth JR, van Wijk R, Jahn MK: Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics. 1999, 152: 1183-1202.
10. Ku H-M, Vision T, Liu J, Tanksley SD: Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 9121-9126. 10.1073/pnas.160271297. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.160271297
11. Rossberg M, Theres K, Acarkana A, Herrero R, Schmitt T, Schumacher K, Schmitz G, Schmidt R: Comparative sequence analysis reveals extensive microcolinearity in the Lateral suppressor regions of the tomato, Arabidopsis, and Capsella genomes. Plant Cell. 2001, 13: 979-988. 10.1105/tpc.13.4.979. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.13.4.979
12. Grant D, Cregan P, Shoemaker RC: Genome organization in dicots: genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 4168-4173. 10.1073/pnas.070430597. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.070430597
13. Kelly MO, Bradford KJ: Insensitivity of the diageotropica tomato mutant to auxin. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82: 713-717. DOI: 10.1104/pp.82.3.713
14. Coenen C, Lomax TL: The diageotropica gene differentially affects auxin and cytokinin responses throughout development in tomato. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117: 63-72. 10.1104/pp.117.1.63. DOI: 10.1104/pp.117.1.63
15. Mito N, Bennett AB: The diageotropica mutation and synthetic auxins differentially affect the expression of auxin-regulated genes in tomato. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109: 293-297. 10.1104/pp.109.1.293. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.1.293
16. Nebenführ A, White TJ, Lomax TL: The diageotropica mutation alters auxin induction of a subset of the AUX/IAA gene family in tomato. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 44: 73-84. 10.1023/A:1006437205596. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006437205596
17. Rice MS, Lomax TL: The auxin-resistant diageotropica mutant of tomato responds to gravity via an auxin-mediated pathway. Planta. 2000, 210: 906-913. 10.1007/s004250050696. DOI: 10.1007/s004250050696
18. The Arabidopsis Information Resource. [http://www.Arabidopsis.org/Blast]
19. Blanc G, Barakat A, Guyot R, Cooke R, Delseney M: Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 1093-1101. 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1093. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1093
20. Tomato Gene Index. [http://www.tigr.org/tdb/lgi/]
21. Bancroft I: Duplicate and diverge: the evolution of plant genome microstructure. Trends Genet. 2001, 17: 89-93. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02179-X. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02179-X
22. Bennetzen JL: Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes: microcolinearity and its many exceptions. Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 1021-1029. 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1021. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1021
23. Paterson AH, Lan TH, Reischmann KP, Chang C, Lin YR: Toward a unified map of higher plant chromosomes, transcending the monocot-dicot divergence. Nat Genet. 1996, 14: 380-382. DOI: 10.1038/ng1296-380
24. Conner JA, Conner P, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: Comparative mapping of the Brassica S locus region and its homeolog in Arabidopsis: implications for the evolution of mating systems in the Brassicaceae. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 801-812. 10.1105/tpc.10.5.801. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.10.5.801
25. Lan TH, DelMonte TA, Reischmann KP, Hyman J, Kowalski SP, McFerson J, Kresovich S, Paterson A: An EST-enriched comparative map of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 776-788. 10.1101/gr.10.6.776. DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.6.776
26. Pan Q, Liu Y-S, Budai-Hadrian O, Selan M, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Fluhr R: Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics. 2000, 155: 309-322.
27. Davis GL, McMullen MD, Baysdorfer C, Musket T, Grant D, Staebell M, Xu G, Polacco M, Koster L, Melia-Hancock S, et al: A maize map standard with sequenced core markers, grass genome reference points and 932 expressed sequence tagged sites (ESTs) in a 1736-locus map. Genetics. 1999, 152: 1137-1172.
28. Quackenbush J, Cho J, Lee D, Liang F, Holt I, Karamycheva S, Parvizi B, Pertea G, Sultana R, White J: The TIGR gene indices: analysis of gene transcript sequences in highly sampled eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acid Res. 2001, 29: 159-164. 10.1093/nar/29.1.159. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.1.159
29. Dubcovsky J, Ramakrishna W, SanMiguel PJ, Busso CS, Liuling Y, Shiloff BA, Bennetzen JL: Comparative sequence analysis of colinear barley and rice bacterial artificial chromosomes. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 1342-1353. 10.1104/pp.125.3.1342. DOI: 10.1104/pp.125.3.1342
30. Wolfe KH, Li W-H, Sharp PM: Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 9054-9058. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054
31. Tarchini R, Biddle P, Wineland R, Tingey S, Rafalski A: The complete sequence of 340 kb of DNA around the rice Adh1-Adh2 region reveals interrupted colinearity with maize chromosome 4. Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 381-392. 10.1105/tpc.12.3.381. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.3.381
32. Ku HM, Liu J, Doganlar S, Tanksley SD: Exploitation of Arabidopsis-tomato synteny to construct a high-resolution map of the ovate-containing region in tomato chromosome 2. Genome. 2001, 44: 470-475. 10.1139/gen-44-3-470. DOI: 10.1139/g01-024
33. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM: A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype specific PCR-based markers. Plant J. 1993, 4: 403-410. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020403.x. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020403.x
34. Primer3. [http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi]
35. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1983, 1: 19-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02712670
36. Pluthero FG: Rapid purification of high-activity Taq DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acid Res. 1993, 21: 4850-4851. DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.20.4850
37. Budiman MA, Mao L, Wood TC, Wing RA: A deep-coverage tomato BAC library and prospects toward development of an STC framework for genome sequencing. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 129-136.
38. Clemson University Genome Institute. [http://www.genome.clemson.edu]
39. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY,. 1989
40. Church GM, Gilbert W: Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 1991-1995. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991