Holy trinities, rivalry termination, and conflict

International Interactions

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 325-353

  Cornwell, Derekh D F ^a   Colaresi, Michael P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Democracy; Polarity; Rivalry; Termination; Threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036994004     PISSN: 03050629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03050620214757     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allison, Paul D. (1995). Survival Analysis Using the SAS System, Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.
2. Babst, D. V. (1972). "A Force for Peace." Industrial Research, pp. 55-58.
3. Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic Statecraft, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
4. Barbieri, K. (1995). "Economic Interdependence and Militarized Interstate Conflict, 1870-1985," paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, IL.
5. Barbieri, K. and Levy, J. (1999). "Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade." Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, pp. 463-479.
6. Beck, N., J. Katz, and R. Tucker (1998). "Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable," American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, pp. 1260-1288.
7. Bennett, D. S. (1996). "Security, Bargaining, and the End of Interstate Rivalry." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 157-184.
8. Bennett, D. S. (1997). "Democracy, Regime Change, and Rivalry Termination." International Interactions, Vol. 22, pp. 369-397.
9. Bennett, D. S. (1998). "Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry Duration." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, pp. 1200-1232, October.
10. Bennett, D. S. and A. Stam (2000). "EUGene: A Conceptual Map." International Interactions, Vol. 26, pp. 179-204. website: www.eugenesoftware.org.
11. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. and S.J. Bradford (1997). "Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, pp. 1414-1461, October.
12. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. and C. Zorn (2001). "Heterogeneity and Repeated Events in Survival Models: A Study of International Disputes." Unpublished Manuscript.
13. Brecher, M. P. James, and J. Wilkenfeld (1990). "Polarity and Stability: New Concepts, Indicators, and Evidence." International Interactions, Vol. 16, pp. 49-80.
14. Bremer, S. (1992). "Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War: 1816-1965." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 36, pp. 309-341.
15. Bueno de Mequita, B. (1981). The War Trap, New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.
16. Campbell, C. S. (1974). From Revolution to Rapprochement: The United States and Great Britain, 1783-1900, New York: Wiley press.
17. Chan, S. (1997). "In Search of the Democractic Peace: Problems and Promise." Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 41, pp. 59-92.
18. Christensen, T. J. and J. Snyder (1990). "Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolar Systems. International Organization, Vol. 44, pp. 137-168, Spring.
19. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (1998). "The Political Uncertainty of Interstate Rivalries: A punctuated Equilibrium Model," in P. F. Diehl, ed., The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries, Urbana, Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
20. Colaresi, M. and W. R. Thompson (2002). "Strategic Rivalry, Protracted Conflict, and International Crises." Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 39, pp. 263-288.
21. Colaresi, M. and W. R. Thompson. (Forthcoming). "Hot Spots or Hot Hands: Serial Crises, Strategic Rivalries, and Escalating Risks." Journal of Politics.
22. Colaresi, M. (2001). "Shocks to the System: Great Power Rivalries and the Leadership Long-Cycle." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, pp. 569-593.
23. Crescenzi, M. J. C. and A. Enterline (2001). "Time Remembered: A Dynamic Model of Interstate Interaction." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 409-432, September.
24. Domke, W. (1988). War and the Changing Global System, New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.
25. Doyle, M. W. (1997). The Ways of War and Peace, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
26. Deutsch, K. W. (1968). The Analysis of International Relations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
27. Deutsch, K. W. and J. D. Singer (1964). "Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability." World Politics, Vol. 16, pp. 390-406, April.
28. Diehl, P. F. (1998). "Introduction: An Overview and some Theoretical Guidelines," in P. F. Diehl, ed., The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries, Urbana, I.L.: University of Illinois Press.
29. Diehl, P. F. and G. Goertz (2000). War and Peace in International Rivalry, Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.
30. Diehl, P. F., J. Reifschneider, and P. Hensel (1996). "United Nations Intervention and Recurrent Conflict." International Organization, Vol. 50, pp. 683-702.
31. Dixon, W. J. (1994). "Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of Conflict" American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, pp. 14-32, March.
32. Gasiorowski, M. J. (1986). "Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-National Evidence." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp. 23-38.
33. Geller, D. S. (1993). "Power Differentials and War in Rival Dyads." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 173-994.
34. Geller, D. S. (2000). "Explaning War: Empirical Patterns and Theoretical Mechanisms," in Manus Midlarsky, ed., The Handbook of War Studies II, Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.
35. Gelpi, Christopher (1997). "Democratic Diversions." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41(2), pp. 255-283.
36. Goertz, G. and P. F. Diehl, (1993). "Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 147-171.
37. Goertz, G. and P. F. Diehl (1995). "The Initiation and Termination of Enduring Rivalries: The Impact of Political Shocks." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, pp. 30-52, February.
38. Gowa, J. (1994). Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
39. Gowa, J. and E. D. Mansfield (1993). "Power Politics and International Trade." American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, pp. 408-420.
40. Hensel, P. R., G. Goertz, and P. F. Diehl (2000). "The Democratic Peace and Rivalries." http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/̃phensel/research.html
41. Hsaio, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Jaggers, K. and T. Gurr (1995). "Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data." Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 32, pp. 469-482.
43. Kennedy, Peter (1998). A Guide to Econometrics, Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.
44. Keohane, R. O., ed. (1986). Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Keohane, R. O. and J. S. Nye (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Cambridge, M.A.: Little Brown.
46. Lake, D. (1993). "Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential?" International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 459-489, December.
47. Lemke, D. and W. Reed (2001). "The Relevance of Politically Relevant Dyads." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, pp. 126-145, February.
48. Levy, J. (1985). War in the Modern Great Power System 1495-1975. University Press of Kentucky.
49. st annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, C.A., March 15-18.
50. Maoz, Z. and N. Abdolali, (1989). "Regime Type and International Conflict, 1816-1976." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 33, pp. 3-35.
51. Maoz, Z. and B. Russett, (1993). "Normative and Structural Causes of the Democratic Peace." American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, pp. 624-638, September.
52. Mansfield, E. (1994). Power Trade and War, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
53. McMillan, S. M. (1997). "Interdependence and Conflict." Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 41, pp. 33-58.
54. Mearsheimer, J. (1994). "The False Promise of International Institutions." International Security, Vol. 19, pp. 5-49, Winter.
55. rd Ed. New York: Knopf.
56. Oneal, J. R. and B. Russett, (1997). "The Classical Liberals were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, June.
57. Oneal, J. R. and B. Russett, (1999). "The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations." World Politics, Vol. 52, pp. 1-37, October.
58. Oneal, J. R., F. H. Oneal, Z. Maoz, and B. Russett (1996). "The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-1985." Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, pp. 11-28.
59. Organski, A. F. K. (1968). World Politics, 2nd Ed. New York: Knopf.
60. st Ed. Chicago, I.L.: University of Chicago Press.
61. Pollins, B. (1989). "Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?" American Political Science Review, Vol. 83, pp. 465-480.
62. Prentice, R. L., B. J. Williams, and A. V. Peterson (1981). "On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data." Biometrika, Vol. 68, pp. 373-379.
63. Richardson, N. R. (1996). "International Trade as a Force for Peace," in C.W. Kegley, Jr., ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenges.
64. Rock, S. R. (1989). Way Peace Breaks Out: Great Power Rapproachment in Historical Perspective, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
65. Rummell, R. J. (1979). National Attributes and Behavior. 2nd Ed., Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage Publications
66. Russett, B. and Z. Maoz, (1993). "The Democratic Peace Since World War II." In Grasping the Democratic Peace, B. Russett, ed., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
67. Russett, B. and H. Starr (2000). "From Democratic Peace to Kantian Peace: Democracy and Conflict in the International System," in Manus Midlarsky, ed., Handbook of War Studies II, Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.
68. Schweller, R. L. (1997). "New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz's Balancing Proposition." American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, pp. 927-930. December.
69. Singer, J. D. and M. Small (1996). Correlates of War, Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.
70. Starr, H. (1992). "Democracy and War: Choice, Learning, and Security Communities." Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 29, pp. 201-213.
71. Stinnett, D. M. and P. F. Diehl, (2001). "The Paths to Rivalry: Behavioral and Structural Explanations of Rivalry Development." Journal of Politics, Vol. 63, pp. 717-741, August.
72. Suzuki, M. (1994). "Economic Interdependence, Relative Gains, and International Cooperation: The Case of Monetary Policy Coordination." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp. 475-498, September.
73. Thompson, W. R. (1995). "Principal Rivals." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 39, pp. 195-223, June.
74. Thompson, W. R. (1999). "Why Rivalries Matter and What Great Power Rivalries Can Tell Us about World Politics," in W.R. Thompson, ed., Great Power Rivalries.
75. Thompson, W. R. (2000). "Caveat Emptor and Chacun Son Gout." Unpublished Manuscript.
76. Thompson, W. R. (2001). "Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics." International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 557-586, December.
77. Vasquez, J. A. (1993). The War Puzzle, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78. Vasquez, J. A. (1997). The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition." American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, pp. 899-912, December
79. Vasquez, J. A. and C. S. Leskiw (2001). "The Origins and War Proneness of Interstate Rivalries." Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 4, pp. 295-317.
80. Waltz, K. N. (1997). "Evaluating Theories." American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, pp. 913-917. December.
81. Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
82. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics, Reading. M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
83. Weart, S. (1997). Never at War, New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.