Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program

Radiology

Volumn 207, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 465-471

  Te Brake, Guido M ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a   Hendriks, Jan H C L ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Cancer screening; Computers, diagnostic aid; Computers, neural network

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031835575     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577496     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. The Netherlands Cancer Registry. Incidence of cancer in The Netherlands: report of The Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1993. Utrecht, The Netherlands: The Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1993.
2. van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening programme: a review of the prior mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers. Cancer 1993; 72:1933-1941.
3. Bureel HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, Finder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 1996; 199:811-817.
4. Ciatto S, Roselli del Turco M, Zappa M. The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography. Br J Cancer 1995; 71:337-346.
5. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
6. Karssemeijer N. Recognition of stellate lesions in digital mammograms. In: Gale AC, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY, eds. Digital mammography 1994. international Congress Series 1069. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1994; 211-219.
7. Karssemeijer N, te Brake GM. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996; 15:611-619.
8. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N. Detection of stellate breast abnormalities. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography 1996. International Congress Series 1119. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996; 341-346.
9. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, et al. The Mammographie Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. In: Gale AC, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY, eds. Digital mammography 1994. International Congress Series 1069. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1994; 375-378.
10. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191: 331-337.
11. Woods K, Bowyer K. A general view of detection algorithms. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography 1996. International Congress Series 1119. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996; 385-390.
12. Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, Goodsitt MM, Adler DD. Computer-aided breast mass detection: false positive reduction using breast tissue composition. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography 1996. International Congress Series 1119. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996; 373-378.
13. Groshong BR, Kegelmeyer WP Jr. Evaluation of a Hough transform method for circumscribed lesion detection. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography 1996. International Congress Series 1119. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996; 361-366.
14. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms. In: Bowyer KW, Astley SM, eds. State of the art in digital mammographic image analysis. Series in machine perception and artificial intelligence 1994, vol 9. Singapore: World Scientific, 1994; 82-102.
15. Miller L, Ramsey N. The detection of malignant masses by non-linear multi-scale analysis. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography 1996. International Congress Series 1119. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1996; 335-340.
16. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N. Detection criteria for evaluation of computer aided diagnosis systems. Presented at the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.
17. Chakraborty DP, Winter LHL. Free response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 1990; 174:873-881.