Boundary effects on dispersal between habitat patches by forest birds (Parus major, P. caeruleus)

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 509-515

  Matthysen, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Belgium; Blue tit; Direction; Emigration; Forest fragmentation; Great tit

Indexed keywords

AVIFAUNA; EDGE EFFECT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; NATAL DISPERSAL; PATCH DYNAMICS;

BELGIUM;

ANIMALIA; AVES; PARUS CAERULEUS; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 0036971304     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021483915033     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beissinger S.R. and Westphal M.I. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 821-841.
2. Bjornstad O.N., Ims R.A. and Lambin X. 2000. Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 427-432.
3. Boone R.B. and Hunter M.L. 1996. Using diffusion models to simulate the effects of land use on grizzly bear dispersal in the Rocky Mountains. Landscape Ecology 11: 51-64.
4. Cantrell R.S. and Cosner C. 1999. Diffusion models for population dynamics incorporating individual behavior at boundaries: Applications to refuge design. Theoretical Population Biology 55: 189-207.
5. Desrochers A. and Hannon S.J. 1997. Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology 11: 1204-1210.
6. Dhondt A.A. and Eyckerman R. 1980. Competition between the Great Tit and the Blue Tit outside the breeding season in field experiments. Ecology 61: 1291-1296.
7. Drent P.J. 1983. The functional ethology of territoriality in the Great Tit Parus major L. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 222 p.
8. Dunning J.B., Stewart D.J., Danielson B.J., Noon B.R., Root T.L., Lamberson R.H. et al. 1995. Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications 5: 3-11.
9. Grubb T.C. and Doherty P.F. 1999. On home-range gap-crossing. Auk 116: 618-628.
10. Haddad N.M. 1999. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. The American Naturalist 153: 215-227.
11. Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Hinsley S.A. 2000. The costs of multiple patch use by birds. Landscape Ecology 15: 765-775.
13. Johnson A.R., Wiens J.A., Milne B.T. and Crist T.O. 1992. Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology 7: 63-75.
14. Kareiva P. and Wennergren U. 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373: 299-302.
15. Kareiva P.M. and Shigesada N. 1983. Analysing insect movements as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56: 234-238.
16. Kindvall O. and Petersson A. 2000. Consequences of modelling interpatch migration as a function of patch geometry when predicting metapopulation extinction risk. Ecological Modelling 129: 101-109.
17. Kuussaari M., Nieminen M. and Hanski I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 791-801.
18. Lambrechts M.M., Blondel J., Caizergues A., Dias P.C., Pradel R. and Thomas D.W. 1999. Will estimates of lifetime recruitment of breeding offspring on small-scale study plots help us to quantify processes underlying adaptation? Oikos 86: 147-151.
19. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W. and Wolfinger R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
20. Machtans C.S., Villard M.A. and Hannon S.J. 1996. Use of riparian buffer strips as movement corridors by forest birds. Conservation Biology 10: 1-15.
21. Matthysen E., Adriaensen F. and Dhondt A.A. 2001. Local recruitment of great and blue tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) in relation to study plot size and degree of isolation. Ecography 24: 33-42.
22. Nour N., Currie D., Matthysen E., Van Damme R. and Dhondt A.A. 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit). Oecologia 114: 522-530.
23. Ruckelshaus M., Hartway C. and Kareiva P. 1997. Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models. Conservation Biology 11: 1298-1306.
24. Saunders D.A. and Hobbs R.J. 1991. The role of corridors in conservation: what do we know and where do we go? In: Saunders D.A. and Hobbs R.J. (eds), Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia, pp. 421-427.
25. Schumaker N.H. 1996. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77: 1210-1225.
26. Stamps J.A., Buechner M. and Krishnan V. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. American Naturalist 129: 533-552.
27. Tischendorf L. and Fahrig L. 2000. How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology 15: 633-641.
28. Tischendorf L. and Wissel C. 1997. Corridors as conduits for small animals: Attainable distances depending on movement pattern, boundary reaction and corridor width. Oikos 79: 603-611.
29. Travis J.M.J. and French D.R. 2000. Dispersal functions and spatial models: expanding our dispersal toolbox. Ecology Letters 3: 163-165.
30. van Noordwijk A.J. 1984. Problems in the analysis of dispersal and a critique on its 'heritability' in the great tit. Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 533-544.
31. Verhulst S., Perrins C.M. and Riddington R. 1997. Natal dispersal of great tits in a patchy environment. Ecology 78: 864-872.