Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit)

Oecologia

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 522-530

  Nour, Nadia ^a   Currie, David ^a,b   Matthysen, Erik ^a   Van Damme, Raoul ^a   Dhondt, André A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c 14850 erc25 cornelledu   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding success; Diet; Forest size; Parus spp; Provisioning

Indexed keywords

DIET; FOOD SUPPLY; FOREST; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; PROVISIONING RATE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

PARUS CAERULEUS; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 0031836507     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050476     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Banbura J, Blondel J. Wilde-Lambrechts H, Galan M-J, Maistre M (1994) Nestling diet variation in an insular Mediterranean population of blue tits Parus caeruleus: effects of years, territories and individuals. Oecologia 100:413-420
2. Betts MM (1955) The food of titmice in oak woodland. J Anim Ecol 24:283-323
3. Blondel J, Dervieux A, Maistre M, Perret P (1991) Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and sclerophyllous habitats. Oecologia 88:9-14
4. Cowie RJ, Hinsley SA (1988) Feeding ecology of great tits (Parus major) and blue tits (Parus caeruleus), breeding in suburban gardens. J Anim Ecol 57:611-626
5. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1993) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Currie D, Nour N, Adriaensen F (1996) A new technique for filming prey delivered to nestlings, making minimal alterations to the nestbox. Bird Study 43:380-382
7. Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, Oxford
8. Dhondt AA (1987) Blue tits are polygynous but great tits monogamous: does the polygyny threshold model hold? Am Nat 129:213-220
9. Dhondt AA, Eyckerman R, Moermans R, Hublé J (1984) Habitat and laying date in great and blue tit. Ibis 126:388-397
10. Dhondt AA, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E, Kempenaers B (1990) Nonadaptive clutch size in tits. Nature 348:723-725
11. Gibb JA, Betts MM (1963) Food and food supply of nestling tits in Breckland pine. J Anim Ecol 32:489-533
12. Henrich-Gebhardt SG (1990) Temporal and spatial variation in food availability and its effects on fledgling size in the great tit. In: Blondel J et al. (eds) Population biology of passerine birds, an integrated approach (NATO ASI series). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175-186
13. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London
14. Matthysen E, Lens L, Van Dongen S, Verheyen GR, Wauters LA, Adriaensen F. Dhondt AA (1995) Diverse effects of forest fragmentation on a number of animal species. Belg J Zool 125:175-183
15. Mc Cauley DE (1989) Extinction, colonisation and population structure: a study of a milkweed beetle. Am Nat 134:365-378
16. Minot EO (1981) Effects of interspecific competition for food in breeding blue tits (Parus caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 50:375-386
17. Møller AP (1989) Nest site selection across field-woodland ecotones: the effect of nest predation. Oikos 56:240-243
18. Nour N, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1997) Effects of habitat fragmentation on foraging behaviour of tits and related species: does niche space vary in relation to size and degree of isolation? Ecography 20:281-286
19. Opdam P (1991) Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecol 5:93-106
20. Opdam P, Rijsdijk G, Husting F (1985) Bird communities in small woods in an agricultural landscape: effects of area and isolation. Biol Conserv 34:333-352
21. Perrins CM (1965) Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 34:604-647
22. Perrins CM (1979) British tits. Collins, Glasgow
23. Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1989) Laying dates and clutch size in the great tits. Wilson Bull 1091:236-253
24. Redpath SM (1995) Habitat fragmentation and the individual: tawny owl, Strix aluco, in woodland patches. J Anim Ecol 64:652-661
25. Riddington R, Gosler AG (1995). Differences in reproductive success and parental qualities between habitats in the great tits (Parus major). Ibis 137:371-378
26. Robinson SK, Thompson FR III, DonovanTM, Whitehead DR, Faaborg J (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987-1990
27. Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and body-size of nestling great tits Parus major. Ibis 112:242-255
28. Royama T (1970) Factors governing the hunting behaviour and selection of food by the great tits (Parus major L.). J Anim Ecol 39:619-669
29. SAS (1994) Version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary
30. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18-32
31. Sokal RP, Rohlf FJ (1996) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York
32. Soulé ME, Simberloff DS (1986) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland
33. Van Balen JH (1973) A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the great tit Parus major in different habitats. Ardea 61:1-93
34. Van Dongen S, Backeljau T, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the population structure of the winter moth Operophtera brumata L. (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Acta Oecol 15:193-206