Sensitivity analysis of different methods of coding taxonomic polymorphism: An example from higher-level bat phylogeny

Cladistics

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 571-584

  Simmons, Nancy B ^a   Geisler, Jonathan H ^b  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAT; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

CHIROPTERA; MAMMALIA; MICROCHIROPTERA; MYSTACINIDAE;

EID: 0036965767     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00293.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Álvarez, Y., Juste, B.J., Tabares, E., Garrido-Pertierra, Íbáñez, C., Bautista, J., 1999. Molecular phylogeny and morphological homoplasy in fruitbats. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1061-1067.
2. Bininda-Emonds, O.R., Bryant, H., Russell, A.P., 1998. Supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis: implicit assumptions of monophyly and a comparison of methods. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64, 101-133.
3. Bogdanowicz, W.A., Owen, R.D., 1992. Phylogenetic analyses of the bat family Rhinolophidae. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. 30, 142-160.
4. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
5. de Queiroz, K., 1987. Phylogenetic systematics of iguanine lizards. A comparative osteological study. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 118, 1-203.
6. Donoghue, M.J., 1994. Progress and prospects in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81, 405-418.
7. Dunlap, J.M., 1998. The evolution of behavior and ecology in Emballonuridae (Chiroptera). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, York University, Ontario.
8. Farris, J.S., 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick, N.I., Funk, V.A. (Eds.), Advances in Cladistics 2. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 7-36.
9. Ferrarezzi, H., Gimenez, E.d.A., 1996. Systematic patterns and the evolution of feeding habits in Chiroptera (Archonta: Mammalia). J. Comp. Biol. 1, 75-94.
10. Frolich, M.W., 1987. Common-is-primitive: a partial validation by tree counting. Syst. Bot. 12, 217-237.
11. Frost, D.R., Rodrigues, M.T., Grant, T., Titus, T.A., 2001. Phylogenetics of the lizard genus Tropidurus (Squamata: Tropiduridae: Tropidurinae): direct optimization, descriptive efficiency, and sensistivity analysis of congruence between molecular data and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21, 352-371.
12. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P.O., Baker, R.H., 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15, 271-313.
13. Göbbel, L., 2002. Morphology of the external nose in Hipposideros diadema and Lavia frons with comments on its diversity and evolution among leaf-nosed Microchiroptera. Cells Tissues Organs 170, 39-60.
14. Griffiths, T.A., 1994. Phylogenetic systematics of slit-faced bats (Chiroptera, Nycteridae), based on hyoid and other morphology. Am. Mus. Novit. 3090, 1-17.
15. Griffiths, T.A., Truckenbrod, A., Sponholtz, P.J., 1992. Systematics of megadermatid bats (Chiroptera, Megadermatidae), based on hyoid morphology. Am. Mus. Novit. 3041, 1-21.
16. Hand, S.J., Kirsch, J.A.W., 1998. A southern origin for the Hipposideridae (Microchiroptera)? Evidence from the Australian fossil record. In: Kunz, T.H., Racey, P.A. (Eds.), Bat Biology and Conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 72-90.
17. Hillis, D.M., Bull, J.J., 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in a phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 182-192.
18. Hutcheon, J.M., Kirsch, J.A.W., Pettigrew, J.D., 1998. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem III. The question of microchiropteran monophyly. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 607-617.
19. Jansa, S.A., Voss, R.S., 2000. Phylogenetic studies on didelphid marsupiais I. Introduction and preliminary results from nuclear IRBP gene sequences. J. Mammal. Evol. 7, 43-77.
20. Kennedy, M., Paterson, A.M., Morales, J.C., Parsons, S., Winnington, A.P., Spencer, H.G., 1999. The long and the short of it: branch lengths and the problem of placing the New Zealand short-tailed bat, Mystacina. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 405-416.
21. Kirsch, J.A.W., Hutcheon, J.M., Brynes, D.G.P., Lloyd, B.D., 1998. Affinities and historical zoogeography of the New Zealand shorttailed bat, Mystacina tuberculata Gray 1843, inferred from DNA-hybridization comparisons. J. Mammal. Evol. 5, 33-64.
22. Kirsch, J.A.W., Pettigrew, J.D., 1998. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem II. DNA-hybridization trees based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 381-388.
23. Koopman, K.F., 1985. A synopsis of the families of bats-part VII. Bat Res. News 25, 25-27 (dated 1984 but issued in 1985).
24. Koopman, K.F., 1993. Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D.E., Reeder, D.M. (Eds.), Mammal Species of the World, a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, second ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 137-241.
25. Koopman, K.F., 1994. Chiroptera: Systematics. In: Handbook of Zoology, Vol. 8 Part 60, Mammalia. Walter de Gruyter, New York.
26. Kornet, D.J., Turner, H., 1999. Coding polymorphism for phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 48, 365-379.
27. Kron, K.A., Judd, W.S., 1997. Systematics of the Lyonia Group (Andromedeae, Ericaceae) and the use of species as terminals in higher-level cladistic analyses. Syst. Bot. 22, 479-492.
28. Lee, M.S.Y., 2000. Tree robustness and clade significance. Syst. Biol. 49, 829-836.
29. Maddison, W.P., Donoghue, M.J., Maddison, D.R., 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33, 83-103.
30. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 1992. MacClade. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
31. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2000. MacClade. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
32. Nixon, K.C., Carpenter, J.M., 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221-241.
33. Nixon, K.C., Davis, J.I., 1991. Polymorphic values and cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7, 233-241.
34. Pierson, E.D., Sarich, V.M., Lowenstein, J.M., Danel, M.J., Rainey, W.E., 1986. A molecular link between the bats of New Zealand and South America. Nature 323, 60-63.
35. Platnick, N.I., Griswold, C.E., Coddington, J.A., 1991. On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7, 337-343.
36. Popper, K.L., 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Harper and Row, New York.
37. Prendini, L., 2001. Species or supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis? Groundplans versus exemplars revisited. Syst. Biol. 50, 290-300.
38. Rice, K.A., Donoghue, M.J., Olmstead, R.G., 1997. Analyzing large data sets: rcbL 500 revisited. Syst. Biol. 46, 554-563.
39. Sanderson, M.J., Donoghue, M.J., 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. In: Sanderson, M.J., Hufford, L. (Eds.), Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 67-89.
40. Simmons, N.B., 1993. The importance of methods: archontan phylogeny and cladistic analysis of morphological data. In: MacPhee, R.D.E. (Ed.), Primates and their Relatives in Phylogenetic Perspective. Advances in Primatology Series. Plenum Publishing Company, New York, pp. 1-61.
41. Simmons, N.B., 1998. A reappraisal of interfamilial relationships of bats. In: Kunz, T.H., Racey, P.A. (Eds.), Bat Biology and Conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 3-26.
42. Simmons, N.B., 2000. Bat phylogeny: an evolutionary context for comparative studies. In: Adams, R.A., Pedersen, S.C. (Eds.), Ontogeny, Functional Ecology, and Evolution of Bats. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 9-58.
43. Simmons, N.B., 2001. Misleading results from the use of ambiguity coding to score polymorphisms in higher-level taxa. Syst. Biol. 50, 613-620.
44. Simmons, N.B., Conway, T.M., 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of mormoopid bats (Chiroptera Mormoopidae) based on morphological data. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 258, 1-97.
45. Simmons, N.B., Geisler, J.H., 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 235, 1-182.
46. Smith, J.D., 1976. Chiropteran evolution. In: Baker, R.J., Jones, J.K. (Eds.), Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomidae, part I. Special Publications. The Museum, Texas Tech Univ., vol. 10. Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, pp. 49-69.
47. Sorenson, M.D., 1996. TreeRot. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
48. Springer, M.S., Teeling, E.C., Madsen, O., Stanhope, M.J., de Jong, W.W., 2001. Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6241-6246.
49. Sudman, P.D., Barkley, L.J., Hafner, M.S., 1994. Familial affinity of Tomopeas ravus (Chiroptera) based on protein electrophoretic and cytochrome B sequence data. J. Mammal. 75, 365-377.
50. Swofford, D.L., 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
51. Teeling, E.C., Madsen, O., Van den Bussche, R.A., de Jong, W.W., Stanhope, M.J., Springer, M.S., 2002. Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1431-1436.
52. Teeling, E.C., Scally, M., Kao, D.J., Romagnoli, M.L., Springer, M.S., Stanhope, M.J., 2000. Molecular evidence regarding the orgin of echolocation and flight in bats. Nature 403, 188-192.
53. Van Den Bussche, R.A., Hoofer, S.R., 2000. Further evidence for inclusion of the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) within Noctilionoidea. J. Mammal. 81, 865-874.
54. Van Den Bussche, R.A., Hoofer, S.R., 2001. Evaluating monophyly of Nataloidea (Chiroptera) with mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Mammal. 82, 320-327.
55. Van Den Bussche, R.A., Hoofer, S.R., Simmons, N.B., 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of mormoopid bats using mitochondrial gene sequences and morphology. J. Mammal. 83, 40-48.
56. Van Valen, L., 1979. The evolution of bats. Evol. Theory 4, 104-121.
57. Watrous, L.E., Wheeler, Q.D., 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Syst. Zool. 30, 1-11.
58. Wetterer, A.L., Rockman, M.V., Simmons, N.B., 2000. Phylogeny of phyllostomid bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): data from diverse morphological systems, sex chromosomes, and restriction sites. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 248, 1-200.
59. Wheeler, W.C., 1992. Extinction, sampling, and molecular phylogenetics. In: Novacek, M., Wheeler, Q. (Eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 205-215.
60. Wheeler, W.C., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321-331.
61. Wible, J.R., Bhatnagar, K.P., 1996. Chiropteran vomeronasal complex and the interfamilial relationships of bats. J. Mammal. Evol. 3, 285-314.
62. Wiens, J.J., 1998. The accuracy of methods for coding and sampling higher-level taxa for phylogenetic analysis: a simulation study. Syst. Biol. 47, 397-413.
63. Wiens, J.J., 2000. Coding morphological variation within species and higher taxa for phylogenetic analysis. In: Wiens, J. (Ed.), Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 115-145.
64. Wiley, E.O., 1981. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
65. Yeates, D.K., 1995. Groundplans and exemplars: Paths to the tree of life. Cladistics 11, 343-357.