Influence of the 'fatigue effect' on the mean deviation measurement in perimetry

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 29-34

  Gonzalez De La Rosa, M ^a   Pareja, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MATERNO INFANTIL DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Age; Campimetry; Effect; Fatigue; Glaucoma; Perimetry; Stepwise multiple linear regression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FATIGUE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0030997963     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067219700700106     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. González de la Rosa M, Abreu Reyes J, Gonzalez Sierra M. Rapid assessment of the visual field in glaucoma using an analysis based on multiple correlations. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990; 228: 387-91.
2. González de la Rosa M, Hernández Brito A, Quijada E. Campimetria para glaucoma explorando cuatro puntos. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1992; 62: 93-8.
3. González de la Rosa M, Sánchez Mendez M, Mesa Moreno C, Mantolán Sarmienlo C, Martin Barrera F. Mathematical model of the glaucomatous visual field. Evaluation of the Delphi procedure. 1992; Xth International Perimetric Society Meeting, Kyoto, Japan.
4. González de la Rosa M, Salazar ME, Sanchez Mendez E, Herńndez Brito A. A practical visual-field exploration device: the Delphi program. Chibret Internat J Ophthal-mol 1994; 10: 7-12.
5. Marra G, Flammer J. The learning and fatigue effect in automated perimetry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229:501-4.
6. Chauhan B, Leblanc R, Drance S, Wijsman K, Cruz A. Effect of the number of threshold determinations on short-term fluctuation in automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1420-4.
7. Fujimoto N, Adachi Usami E. Effect of number test points in automated perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 113: 317-20.
8. Hudson CH, Wild JM, O'Neil EC. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 268-80.
9. Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE. Evaluation of Fastpac, a new strategy for thresholds estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 949-54.
10. Katz J, Sommer A. A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1083-6.
11. Searle A, Wild JM, Shaw DE, O'Neill EC. Time-related variation in normal automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 701-7.
12. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 81-6,
13. Gonzalez de la Rosa M, Losada M, Arias A. The mean deviation in the Delphi and 24-2 perimetric programs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36 (suppl): 31588.
14. Kulze JC, Stewart WC, Sutherland SE. Factors association with a learning effect in glaucoma patients using automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 681-6.
15. Wild JM, Dengler-Harles M, Searle AE, O'Neill EC, Crews SJ. The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1989; 67: 537-45.