Speakers' footing in a collaborative writing task: A resource for addressing disagreement while avoiding conflict

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 481-514

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a   Sanders, Robert E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036939929     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Antaki, C., Diaz, F., & Collins, A. (1996). Keeping your footing: Conversational completion in three-part sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 151-171.
2. Argyle, M., Henderson, M., & Furnham, A. (1985), The rules of social relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 125-139.
3. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baynham, M. (1999). Double voicing and the scholarly "I": On incorporating the words of others in academic discourse. Text, 19, 485-504.
5. Baynham, M., & Slembrouck, S. (1999). Speech representation and institutional discourse. Text, 19, 439-457.
6. Bonito, J. A. (2000). The effect of contributing substantively on perceptions of participation. Small Group Research, 31, 528-553.
7. Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275-303.
8. Buysse, A., De Clercq, A., Verhofstadt, L., Heene, E., Roeyers, H., & Van Oost, P. (2000). Dealing with relational conflict: A picture in milliseconds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 574-597.
9. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1989). A model of the perceived competence of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 15, 630-649.
10. Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clift, R. (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society, 28, 523-553.
12. Daiute, C. (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2?: Patterns of influence by collaborative authors. Written Communication, 3, 382-408.
13. Dale, H. (1994). Collaborative writing interactions in one ninth grade classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 334-344.
14. DeFrancisco, V. L. (1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse in Society, 2, 413-423.
15. Diaz, F., Antaki, C., & Collins, A. (1996). Using completion to formulate a statement collectively. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 525-542.
16. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1991). Shared understandings - Structuring the writing process through dialog. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 330-342.
17. Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 369-408.
18. Garcia, A. (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review, 56, 818-835.
19. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
20. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21. Heisterkamp, B. L. (2000). Neutrality as an interactive phenomenon in community mediation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
22. Herzfeld, M. (1980). Social tension and inheritance by lot in three Greek villages. Anthropological Quarterly, 53, 91-100.
23. Holt, E. (1999). Just gassing: An analysis of direct reported speech in a conversation between employees of a gas supply company. Text, 19, 505-537.
24. Hoyle, S. M. (1994). Children's use of discourse markers in the creation of imaginary participation frameworks. Discourse Processes, 17, 447-464.
25. Janda, M. A. (1990). Collaboration in a traditional classroom environment. Written Communication, 7, 291-315.
26. Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2, 181-199.
27. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction. In G. B. Lee (Ed.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86-100). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
28. Johnstone, B. (2000). The individual voice in language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 405-424.
29. Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 193-218.
30. Keys, C. W. (1996). Writing collaborative laboratory reports in ninth grade science: Three case studies of social interactions. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 178-186.
31. Kim, M. S., & Leung, T. (2000). A multicultural view of conflict management styles: Review and critical synthesis. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 23, pp. 227-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Kinney, C. J. (1998). Role, stance, and footing: A frame analysis of leaders' talk in small group discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
33. Larson, J. (1999). Analyzing participation frameworks in kindergarten writing activity: The role of overhearer in learning to write. Written Communication, 16, 225-257.
34. Larson, J., & Maier, M. (2000). Co-authoring classroom texts: Shifting participant roles in writing activity. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 468-497.
35. Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 125-136.
36. Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wooten (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161-227). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
37. Lulofs, R. S. (1994). Conflict: From theory to action. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch-Scarisbrick.
38. Matoesian, G. (1999). The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28, 491-521.
39. Maybin, J. (1999). Framing and evaluation in ten- to twelve-year-old school children's use of repeated, appropriated and reported speech in relation to their induction into educational procedures and practices. Text, 19, 459-484.
40. McCawley, J. D. (1999). Participant roles, frames, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 595-619.
41. Pemberton, L. (1997). Telltales and overhearers: Participant roles in electronic mail communication. In J. Connally & L. Pemberton (Eds.), Linguistic concepts and methods in CSCW (pp. 145-160). New York: Springer.
42. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. A. Heritage (Ed.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Sanders, R. E. (1997). The production of symbolic objects as components of larger wholes. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 245-278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Sillars, A. L., Coletti, S. F., Parry, D., & Rogers, M. A. (1982). Coding verbal conflict tactics: Nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the "avoidance-distributive-integrative" distinction. Human Communication Research, 9, 83-95.
45. Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 165-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.