How good are endangered species recovery plans?

BioScience

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 643-649

  Boersma, P D ^a   Kareiva, P ^a   Fagan, W F ^a   Clark, J A ^a   Hoekstra, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034875567     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0643:hgaesr]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. The Endangered Species Act: Its history, provisions, and effectiveness
2. Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States
3. Improving recovery planning for threatened and endangered species
4. Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
5. Authorship and the use of biological information in Endangered Species Act recovery plans
6. Recovery plan revisions: Progress or just process?
7. A comprehensive review of Endangered Species Act recovery plans
8. Lessons learned from a study of habitat conservation planning
9. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants
10. Using the best scientific data for endangered species conservation
11. Improving recovery planning for threatened and endangered species: Comparative analysis of recovery plans can contribute to more effective recovery planning
12. Notice of interagency cooperative policy on recovery plan participation and implementation under the Endangered Species Act
13. Notice of interagency, cooperative policy for the ecosystem approach to the Endangered Species Act
14. Notice of availability of a final addendum to the handbook for habitat conservation planning and incidental take permitting process
15. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States