Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 583-599

  Morey, Leslie C ^a   Quigley, Brian D ^a   Sanislow, Charles A ^b   Skodol, Andrew E ^c   McGlashan, Thomas H ^b   Shea, M Tracie ^d   Stout, Robert L ^d   Zanarini, Mary C ^e   Gunderson, John G ^e  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MCLEAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MENTAL DISEASE; PERSONALITY TEST; RATING SCALE; REVISED NEO PERSONALITY INVENTORY; TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036912261     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_11     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS Users Guide (Version 3.6) [Computer Software]. Chicago: SPSS.
3. Archer, R. P., Fontaine, J., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Effects of two MMPI-2 validity scales on basic scale relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 97-102.
4. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Waller, N. G. (1992). "Normal" personality inventories in clinical assessment: General requirements and the potential for using the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 14-19.
5. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
6. Bradshaw, S. D. (1997). Impression management and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Cause for concern? Psychological Reports, 80, 832-834.
7. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Butcher, J. N., & Rouse, S. V. (1996). Personality: Individual differences and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 87-111.
9. Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R. A., & Berry, D. T. R. (2000). Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 472-488.
10. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
11. Clark, L. A. (1993a). Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Clark, L. A. (1993b). Personality disorder diagnosis: Limitations of the five-factor model. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 100-104.
13. Coolidge, F. L., Becker, L. A., DiRito, D. C., Durham, R. L., Kinlaw, M. M., & Philbrick, P. B. (1994). On the relationship of the five-factor model to personality disorders: Four reservations. Psychological Reports, 75, 11-21.
14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Normal personality in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992c). Reply to Ben-Porath and Waller. Psychological Assessment, 4, 20-22.
17. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Stability and change in personality assessment: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 86-94.
18. Davis, R. D., & Millon, T. (1993). The five-factor model for personality disorders: Apt or misguided? Psychological Inquiry, 4, 104-109.
19. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden.
20. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & William, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). CITY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
21. Gunderson, J. G., Shea, M. T., Skodol, A. E., McGlashan, T. H., Morey, L. C., Stout, R. L., et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders study: Development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 300-315.
22. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Hyler, S. E., & Lyons, M. (1988). Factor analysis of the DSM-III personality disorder clusters: A replication. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 304-308.
24. Jösreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
25. Kass, F., Skodol, A. E., Charles, E., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1985). Scaled ratings of DSM-III personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 627-630.
26. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
27. Kurtz, J. E., & Morey, L. C. (1998). Negativism in evaluative judgments of words among depressed outpatients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 351-361.
28. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
29. McCrae, R. R., Stone, S. V., Fagan, P. F., & Costa, P. T. (1998). Identifying causes of disagreement between self-reports and spouse ratings of personality. Journal of Personality, 66, 285-313.
30. McGlashan, T. H., Grilo, C. M., Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Shea, M. T., Morey, L. C., et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders study: Baseline Axis I/II and II/II diagnostic co-occurrence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 256-264.
31. Morey, L. C. (1996). An Interpretive Guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
32. Paulhus, D., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 60, 307-317.
33. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100-108.
34. Piedmont, R. L., & Ciarrocchi, J. W. (1999). The utility of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory in an outpatient, drug rehabilitation context. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 213-226.
35. Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Anglietner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582-593.
36. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Morey, L. C., & Ustad, K. L. (1997). Detection of feigned mental disorders on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 629-640.
37. Rolland, J. P., Parker, W. D., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A psychometric examination of the French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 7, 269-291.
38. Ross, S. R., Bailey, S. E., & Millis, S. R. (1997). Positive self-presentation effects and the detection of defensiveness on the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 4, 395-408.
39. Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138.
40. Topping, G. D., & O'Gorman, J. G. (1997). Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 117-124.
41. Trull, T. J. (1992). DSM-III-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: An empirical comparison. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 553-560.
42. Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.). (1996). The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Guilford.
44. Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Sickel, A. E., & Yong, L. (1996). The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.
45. Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C. A., Morey, L. C., et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: II. Reliability of Axis I and Axis II diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291-299.