Positive self-presentation effects and the detection of defensiveness on the NEO PI-R

Assessment

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 395-408

  Ross, Scott R ^a,c   Bailley, Steven E ^b   Millis, Scott R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000412648     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107319119700400410     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baer, R. A., Wetter, M. W., & Berry, D. T. R. (1992). Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 509-525.
2. Bailley, S. E., & Ross, S. R. (1996, May). The effects of simulated faking on the Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
3. Balogh, D., & Merritt, R. D. (1996). Using diagnostic efficiency statistics to evaluate the concurrent validity of the perceptual aberration scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 321-336.
4. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Waller, N. G. (1992a). Five big issues in clinical assessment: A rejoinder to Costa and McCrae. Psychological Assessment, 4, 23-25.
5. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Waller, N. G. (1992b). "Normal" personality inventories in clinical assessment: General requirements and the potential for using the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 14-19.
6. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
7. Borgatta, F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 12, 8-17.
8. Butcher, J. N. (1994, August). Trends in personality assessment: What will the new century be like? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
9. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Cashel, M. L., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Martin-Cannici, C. (1995). The Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the detection of defensiveness. Assessment, 2, 333-342.
11. Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.
12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
13. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Reply to Ben-Porath and Waller. Psychological Assessment, 4, 20-22.
14. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992c). Professional manual for the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Costa, P. T., Jr., & Widiger, T. A. (1994). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Crown, D., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
17. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
18. Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Reanalysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149-170.
19. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, or 3?-Criteria for a toxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
20. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
21. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
22. Gordon, M. E., & Gross, R. H. (1978). A critique of methods for operationalizing the concept of fakeability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 771-782.
23. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "big five" personality variables - construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
24. John, O. P. (1990). The "big five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
25. Lautenschlager, G. J. (1986). Within-subject measures for the assessment of individual differences in faking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 309-316.
26. McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
27. McCrae, R. R. (1986). Well-being scales do not measure social desirability. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 390-392.
28. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
29. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). The NEO Personality Inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 367-376.
30. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Dahlstrom, W. G., Barefoot, J. C., Siegler, I. C., & Williams, R. B., Jr. (1989). A caution on the use of the MMPI K-correction in research on psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 58-65.
31. McKinley, J. C., Hathaway, S. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). The MMPI: VI. The K scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 20-31.
32. Meehl, P. E., & Hathaway, S. R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525-564.
33. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
35. Norusis, M. (1994). SPSS advanced statistics 6.1. Chicago: SPSS.
36. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
37. Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaire (pp. 142-165). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
38. Paulhus, D. L. (1990). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social-psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100-107.
40. Rogers, R. (1988). Researching dissimulation. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 309-327). New York: Guilford.
41. Scandell, D. J., & Wazelek, B. G. (1996). Self-presentation strategies on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Implications for detecting faking. Psychological Reports, 79, 1115-1121.
42. Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138.
43. Shedler, J., Mayman, M., and Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.
44. Snow, W. (1992, February). Implications of base rates for the diagnosis of malingering. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, San Diego, CA.
45. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.