Stability and change in personality assessment: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 86-94

  Costa Jr , Paul T ^a   McCrae, Robert R ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MODEL; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW;

EID: 0343145702     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6801_7     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
2. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Waller, N. G. (1992). Five big issues in clinical personality assessment: A rejoinder to Costa and McCrae. Psychological Assessment, 4, 23-25.
3. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables. European Journal of Personality, 6, 199-214.
4. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (pp. 65-102). New York: Academic.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
9. Dicken, C. (1963). Good impression, social desirability, and acquiescence as suppressor variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 699-720.
10. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
11. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
12. Goldberg, L. R., & Kilkowski, J. M. (1985). The prediction of semantic consistency in self-descriptions: Characteristics of pensons and of terms that affect the consistency of responses to synonym and antonym pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 82-98.
13. Halverson, C. F., Kohnstamm, G. A., & Martin, R. P. (Eds.). (1994). The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
15. John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T.E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994).The "little five": Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160-178.
16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
17. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Dahlstrom, W. G., Barefoot, J. C., Siegler, I. C., & Williams, R. B., Jr. (1989). A caution on the use of the MMPI K-correction in research on psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 58-65.
18. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
19. Mervielde, I., Buyst, V., & DeFruyt, F. (1995). The validity of the Big-Five as a model for teachers' ratings of individual differences among children aged 4-12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 525-534.
20. Parker, W. D. (in press). An empirical typology of perfectionism. American Educational Research Journal.
21. Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N., & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100-108.
22. Piedmont, R. L., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Are validity scales valid in volunteer samples? Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Unpublished manuscript, Loyola College, Maryland.
23. Schinka, J. A., & Borum, R. (1994). Readability of normal personality inventories. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 95-101.
24. Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607-620.
25. Stein, L. A. R., Graham, J. R., & Williams, C. L. (1995). Detecting fake-bad MMPI-A profiles. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 415-427.
26. Waller, N. G., & Reise, S. P. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment: An illustration with the Absorption scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1051-1058.