A psychometric examination of the french translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 269-291

  Rolland, Jean Pierre ^a   Parker, Wayne D ^b   Stumpf, Heinrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOLDIER;

EID: 3743061665     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7102_13     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Block, J. (1995a). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
2. Block, J. (1995b). Going beyond the five factors given: Rejoinder to Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 226-229.
3. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1991). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung f«nf robuster Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [An inventory to measure five robust factors of personality]. Diagnostica, 37, 29-41.
4. Brand, C. R. (1995). How many dimensions of personality? The "Big 5", the "Gigantic 3" or the "Comprehensive 6." Psychologica Belgica, 34, 257-273.
5. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Cattell, H. E. B. (1995). Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychological Reports, 77, 1307-1311.
7. Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
8. Cellar, D. F., Miller, M. L., Doverspike, D. D., & Klawsky, J. D. (1996). Comparison of factor structures and criterion-related validity coefficients for two measures of personality based on the five-factor model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 694-704.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Costa, P. T., Jr., Busch, C. M., Zonderman, A. B., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Correlations of MMPI factor scores with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 640-650.
11. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216-220.
14. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
15. Eysenck, H. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
16. FormyDuval, D. L., Williams, J. E., Patterson, D. J., & Fogle, E. E. (1995). A "big five" scoring system for the item pool of the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 59-76.
17. Goldberg, L. R., & Saucier, G. (1995). So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 221-225.
18. Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
19. Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1983). Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
20. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1983). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
22. Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1994). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441-444.
23. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
24. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
25. Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
26. Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Fraboni, M., & Goffin, R. D. (1995). A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 33-45.
27. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17-40.
28. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171-188.
29. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Piedmont, R. L. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 61, 1-26.
30. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
31. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
32. Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur [Language and personality structure]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer.
34. Paunonen, S. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal Procrustes rotation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33-59.
35. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
36. Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J., & Försterling, F. (1992). Personality structures across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447-456.
37. Piedmont, R. L., & Chae, J. H. (1997). Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality: Development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for Koreans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 131-155.
38. Piedmont, R. L., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Are validity scales valid in volunteer samples?: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Adjective Check List scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 630-637.
40. Rolland, J. P., & Petot, J. M. (1994). Questionnaire de Personnalité NEO-PI-R (traduction française provisoire) [NEO-PI-R Personality Questionnaire (provisional French translation)]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Paris X-Nanterre.
41. Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138.
42. Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
43. Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1-16.
44. Stumpf, H. (1993). The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: A cross-national evaluation. Journal of Personality, 61, 27-48.
45. Stumpf, H., & Steinhart, I. (1981). Zur Anfälligkeit der Skalenwerte der deutschen Personality Research Form (KA) gegenüber tendenziöser Beantwortung [On the susceptibility of the scale scores of the German Personality Research Form (KA) to tendentious responding]. Wehrpsychologische Untersuchngen, Heft 3.
46. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (in press). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In S. Briggs & J. M. Cheek (Eds.), Personality measures: Development and evaluation (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47. Trull, T. J., Useda, J. D., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Comparison of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), the NEO-PI, and NEO-PI-R. Psychological Assessment, 7, 508-516.
48. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.