Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA supports the monophyly of Dacini fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 658-664

  Smith, Paul T ^a   McPheron, Bruce A ^a   Kambhampati, Srini ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dacini; Fruit flies; Mitochondrial DNA; Phylogenetics; Tephritidae

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENY;

BACTROCERA; CERATITIS; DACINI; DACUS; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; TEPHRITIDAE; TEPHRITINAE; TRYPETINAE;

EID: 0036880553     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0658:PAOMDS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Archie, J. W. 1989. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Syst. Zool. 38: 219-252.
2. Berlocher, S. H. 2000. Genetic population structure in Tephritidae, pp. 711-730. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
3. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
4. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 384-397.
5. Bush, G. L. 1975. Modes of animal speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 339-364.
6. Clary, D. O., and D. R. Wolstenholme. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: Nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol. 22: 252-271.
7. Cunningham, C. W. 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 733-740.
8. Cunningham, C. W. 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46: 464-478.
9. De Meyer, M. 2000. Phylogeny of the genus Ceratitis (Dacinae: Ceratitidini), pp. 409-428. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
10. De Queiroz, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42: 368-372.
11. DE Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 657-681.
12. Díaz-Fleischer, F., and M. Aluja. 2000. Behavior of tephritid flies: a historical perspective, pp. 39-72. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Drew, R.A.I., and D. L. Hancock, 2000. Phylogeny of the tribe Dacini (Dacinae) based on morphological, distributional, and biological data, pp. 491-504. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
14. Eriksson, T. 1998. AutoDecay, ver. 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
15. Faith, D. P. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and non-monophyly. Syst. Zool. 40: 366-375.
16. Faith, D. P., and P. S. Cranston. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7: 1-28.
17. Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18: 374-385.
18. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
19. Farris, J. S., S. M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
20. Farris, J. S., S. M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44: 570-572.
21. Feder, J. L., C. A. Chilcote, and G. L. Bush. 1988. Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature (Lond.) 336: 61-64.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
23. Fletcher, B. S. 1987. The biology of daine fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32: 115-144.
24. Foote, R. H., F. L. Blanc, and A. L. Norrbom. 1993. Handbook of the fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of America north of Mexico. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, NY.
25. Futuyma, D. J., and G. C. Mayer. 1980. Non-allopatric speciation in animals. Syst. Zool. 29: 254-271.
26. Han, H.-Y., and B. A. McPheron. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic study of Tephritidae (Insecta: Diptera) using partial sequences of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1: 17-32.
27. Han, H.-Y., and B. A. McPheron. 2000. Nucleotide sequence data as a tool to test phylogenetic relationships among higher groups of Tephritidae, pp. 115-134. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
28. Hancock, D. L. 1986. Classification of the Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae), with a discussion of the Afrotropical fauna. J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr. 49: 275-305.
29. Headrick, D. H., and R. D. Goeden. 1998. The biology of nonfrugivorous tephritid fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 217-241.
30. Headrick, D. H., and R. D. Goeden 2000. Behavior of flies in the subfamily Tephritidae, pp. 671-710. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
31. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
32. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 152-158.
33. Kambhampati, S., and P. T. Smith. 1995. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect Mol. Biol. 4: 233-236.
34. Kambhampati, S., W. C. Black IV, and K. S. Rai. 1992. Random amplified polymorphic DNA of mosquitoes: techniques, applications and statistical analyses. J. Med. Entomol. 29: 939-945.
35. Korneyev, V. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the families of the superfamily Tephritoidea, pp. 3-22. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
36. Lyons-Weiler, J. 2001. RASA 3.0 Turbo for the Macintosh. http://bio.uml.edu/LW/RASA.html.
37. Lyons-Weiler, J., G. A. Hoelzer, and R. J. Tausch. 1996. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 749-757.
38. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2000. MacClade version 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
39. McPheron, B. A., and H.-Y. Han. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of North America Rhagoletis (Diptera. Tephritidae) and related genera using mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7: 1-16.
40. McPheron, B. A., D. C. Smith, and S. H. Berlocher. 1988. Genetic differences between host races of Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature (Lond.) 336: 64-66.
41. McPheron, B. A., H.-Y. Han, J. G. Silva, and A. L. Norrbom. 2000. Phylogeny of the genera Anastrepha and Toxotrypana (Trypetinae: Toxotrypanini) based upon 16S rRNA mitochondrial DNA sequences, pp. 505-533. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
42. Mickevich, M. F., and W. M. Farris. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30: 351-370.
43. Munro, H. K. 1984. A taxonomic treatise on the Dacidae (Tephritoidea, Diptera) of Africa. Entomol. Mem. S. Afr. Dep. Agric. 61: 1-313.
44. Nixon, K. C., and J. M. Carpenter. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
45. Norrbom, A. L., L. E. Carroll, and A. Freidberg. 1998. Status of knowledge, pp. 9-47. In F.C. Thompson [Ed.], Fruit Fly Expert Identification System and Systematic Information Database. Myia vol. 9.
46. Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357-358.
47. Prokopy, R. J. 1980. Mating behavior in frugivorous Tephritidae in nature, pp. 37-45. In J. Koyama, [Ed.], Proceedings of a symposium on fruit fly problems. 16th International Congress of Entomology, Kyoto, Japan.
48. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
49. Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-701.
50. Smith, J. J., and G. L. Bush. 1997. Phylogeny of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7: 33-43.
51. Smith, P. T., S. Kambhampati, W. Völkl, and M. Mackauer. 1999. A phylogeny of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) inferred from mitochondrial NADH 1 dehydrogenase gene sequence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 236-245.
52. Steck, G. J. 1991. Biochemical systematics and population genetic structure of Anastrepha fraterculus and related species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 10-28.
53. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), vers. 4:0b6. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
54. Tajima, F., and M. Nei. 1984. Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1: 269-285.
55. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res. 24: 4876-4882.
56. White, I. M. 2000. Morphological features of the Dacini (Dacinae): their significance to behavior and classification, pp. 505-533. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [Eds.], Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
57. White, I. M., and M. M. Elson-Harris. 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.