Vermittlung von wissenschaftsverständnis in der grundschule

Zeitschrift fur Padagogik

Volumn 48, Issue SPEC. ISS. 45, 2002, Pages 192-206

  Sodian, Beate ^a   Thoermer, Claudia ^a   Kircher, Ernst ^b   Grygier, Patricia ^b   Günther, Johannes ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036865073     PISSN: 00443247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baumert J. u.a. (2000): TIMSS/III. Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullanfbahn. Leske & Budrich: Opladen.
2. Brown, A.L./Campione, J.C. (1994): Guided discovery in a community of learners. In: McGilly, K. (Ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and educational practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, S. 229-270.
3. Bullock, M./Ziegler, A. (1999): Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In: Weinert F.E./Schneider, W. (Eds.) Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 38-44.
4. Carey, S. (1986): Cognitive Science and Science Education. In: American Psychologist, 41, S. 1123-1130.
5. Carey, S./Evans, R./Honda, M./Jay, E./Unger, C. (1989): An experiment is when you try it and see if it works. A study of junior high school students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. In: International Journal of Science Education, 11, S. 514-529.
6. Carey, S./Smith, C. (1993): On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In: Educational Psychologist, 28, S. 235-251.
7. Chi, M.T.H./Slotta, J.D./de Leeuw, N. (1994): From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. In: Learning and Instruction, 4, S. 27-43.
8. Dewey, J. (1916/1964): Demokratie und Erziehung. Braunschweig.
9. Driver, R. u.a. (1996): Young peoples images of science. Bristol: Open University Press.
10. Case, R. (1974): Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. In: Cognitive Psychology, 6, S. 544-573.
11. Chen, Z./Klahr, D. (1999): All other things being equal: children's acquisition of the control of variables strategy. In: Child Development, 70, S. 1098-1120.
12. Chi, M.T.H./Slotta, J.D./de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. In: Learning and Instruction, 4, S. 27-43.
13. Chinn, C.A./Brewer, W.E (1993): The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. In: Review of Educational Research, 63, S. 1-49.
14. Duit, R. (2002): Alltagsvorstellungen und Physildernen. In: Kircher, E./Schneider, W.B. (Hrsg.). Physikdidaktik in der Praxis. Heidelberg Berlin: Springer.
15. Gallagher, J.J. (1991): Prospective and practising secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. In: Science Education, 75, S. 121-133.
16. Höttecke, D. (2001). Die Natur der Naturwissenschaften historisch verstehen. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
17. Honda, M. (1994): Linguistic inquiry in the science classroom: It is science, but it's not like a science problem in a book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
18. Kircher, E. (1993): Warum ist Physiklernen schwierig?. In: Schneider, W.B. (Hrsg.). Wege in der Physikdidaktik. Erlangen: Palm & Enke, S. 124-134.
19. Kircher, E. (1995): Studien zur Physikdidaktik - Erkenntnis- und wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen. Kiel: IPN.
20. Leach, J. (1999): Students' understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science. In: International Journal of Science Education, 21, S. 789-806.
21. Lederman, N.G. (1992): Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A Review of the Research. In: Journal of Research of Science Teaching, 29, H.4, S. 331-359.
22. Litt, T. (1959): Naturwissenschaft und Menschenbildung. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
23. McComas, W.F. (Ed.) (1998): The Nature of Science in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. McComas, W.F/McClough, M./Almaroza, H. (1998): The role and character of the nature of science. In: McComas, W.F. (Ed.) The Nature of Science in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, S. 3-39.
25. McComas, W.F./Olson, J.K. (1998): The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In: McComas, W.F. (Ed.). The Nature of Science in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer, S. 41-52.
26. Meyling, H. (1997): How to change students' conceptions of the epistemology of science. In: Science & Education, 6, S. 397-416.
27. Pomeroy, D. (1993): Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparisons of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers and elementary teachers. In: Science Education, 77 (3), S. 261-278.
28. Ryan, A.G./Aikenhead, G.S. (1992): Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. In: Science Education, 76, S. 559-580.
29. Samarapungavan, A. (1992): Children's judgments in theory choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood. In: Cognition, 45, S. 1-32.
30. Schecker, H. (1985): Das Schülervorverständnis zur Mechanik. Dissertation, Universität Bremen.
31. Schrempp, I./Sodian, B. (1999): Wissenschaftliches Denken im Grundschulalter. Die Fähigkeit zur Hypothesenprüfung und Evidenzevaluation im Kontext der Attribution von Leistungsergebnissen. In: Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 31, S. 67-77.
32. Smith, C./Maclin, D./Houghton, C./Hennessey, M.G. (2000): Sixth grade students' epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. In: Cognition and Instruction, 18, S. 349-422.
33. Sodian, B./Zaitchik, D./Carey, S. (1991): Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. In: Child Development, 62, S. 753-766.
34. Solomon, J. (1991): Teaching about the nature of science in the British National Curriculum. In: Science Education 75, H.1, S. 95-103.
35. Thoermer, C./Sodian, B. (im Druck): Science undergraduates' and graduates' epistemologies of science: The notion of interpretive frameworks. In: New Ideas in Psychology.
36. Vosniadou, S. (1994): Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. In: Learning and Instruction, 4, S. 45-69.
37. White, B.Y./Frederiksen, J.R. (1998): Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. In: Cognition and Instruction, 16, S. 3-118.