Intensity discrimination and auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 793-799

  Gallégo, Stéphane ^a   Micheyl, Christophe ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SOUND INTENSITY;

EID: 0031658478     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.112.4.793     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbas, P. J., & Brown, C. J. (1991). Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: Growth of response with current level. Hearing Research, 51, 123-137.
2. Avakyan, R. V., & Radianova, E. A. (1963). The special features of differential intensity thresholds for a brief sound signal. Sovietic Physical Acoustics, 8, 320-323.
3. Beliaeff, M., Dubus, P., Leveau, J. M., Repetto, J. C., & Vincent, P. (1994). Sound signal processing and stimulation coding of the Digisonic DX10 15-channel cochlear implant. In I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. S. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in cochlear implants (pp. 198-203). Vienna, Austria: Manz.
4. Carlyon, R. P., & Moore, B. C. J. (1984). Intensity discrimination: A "severe departure" from Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1369-1376.
5. Carlyon, R. P., & Moore, B. C. J. (1986a). Continuous versus gated pedestals and the "severe departure" from Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 453-460.
6. Carlyon, R. P., & Moore, B. C. J. (1986b). Detection of tones in noise and the "severe departure" from Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 461-464.
7. Delgutte, B. (1987). Peripheral processing of speech information: Implications from a physiological study of intensity discrimination. In M. E. H. Scheuten (Ed.), Psychophysics and speech perception (pp. 333-353). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
8. Eggermont, J. J., & Don, M. (1980). Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking: II. Effect of click intensity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,68, 1671-1675.
9. Gallégo, S., Micheyl, C., Berger-Vachon, C., Truy, E., Morgon, A., & Collet, L. (1996). Ipsilateral ABR with cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 116, 228-233.
10. Gallégo, S., Truy, E., Morgon, A., & Collet, L. (1997). EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 117, 164-168.
11. Goldstein, M. H. Jr., & Klang, N. Y. S. (1958). Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 107-114.
12. Hartmann, R., Topp, G., & Klinke, R. (1984). Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Research, 13, 47-62.
13. Javel, E. (1989). Acoustic and electrical encoding of temporal information. In J. Miller & F. A. Spelman (Eds.), Cochlear implants: Models of the electrically stimulated ear (pp. 247-296). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Long, G. R., & Cullen, J. K. Jr. (1986). Intensity difference limens at high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 507-513.
15. McGill, W. J., & Goldberg, J. P. (1968a). A study of the near-miss involving Weber's law and pure-tone intensity discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 4, 105-109.
16. McGill, W. J., & Goldberg, J. P. (1968b). Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 576-581.
17. Moore, B. C. J., & Raab, D. H. (1974). Pure-tone intensity discrimination: Some experiments relating to the near-miss to Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1049-1054.
18. Nelson, D. A., Schmitz, J. L., Donaldson, G. S., Viemeister, N. F., & Javel, E. (1996). Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2393-2414.
19. Parkins, C. W. (1989). Temporal response patterns of AN fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hearing Research, 41, 137-168.
20. Penner, M. J., & Viemeister, N. F. (1973). Intensity discrimination: The effects of click bandwidth and background noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1184-1188.
21. Phillips, D. P. (1987). Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: Neural correlates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1-12.
22. Plack, C., & Viemeister, N. F. (1992a). The effects of notched noise on intensity discrimination under forward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1902-1910.
23. Plack, C., & Viemeister, N. F. (1992b). Intensity discrimination under backward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3097-3101.
24. Raab, D. H., & Taub, H. A. (1969a). Click-intensity discrimination with and without background masking noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 965-968.
25. Raab, D. H., & Taub, H. A. (1969b). Fluctuations in N1 amplitude in relation to click-intensity discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 969-978.
26. Robles, L., Ruggero, M. A., & Rich, N. C. (1986). Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1364-1374.
27. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: I. Basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11, 157-189.
28. Shannon, R. V. (1992). Temporal modulation transfer function in patients with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2156-2163.
29. Shannon, R. V., & Otto, S. R. (1990). Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. Hearing Research, 47, 159-168.
30. Viemeister, N. F. (1983). Auditory intensity discrimination at high frequencies in the presence of noise. Science, 221, 1206-1208.
31. Viemeister, N. F. (1988a). Intensity coding and the dynamic range problem. Hearing Research, 34, 267-274.
32. Viemeister, N. F. (1988b). Psychophysical aspects of auditory intensity coding. In G. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Auditory function (pp. 213-241). New York: Wiley.
33. Viemeister, N. F., & Wakefield, G. H. (1991). Temporal integration and multiple looks Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 858-865.
34. Winslow, R. L., & Sachs, M. B. (1988). Single-tone intensity discrimination based on AN rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hearing Research, 35, 165-190.
35. Yates, G. K. (1990). The basilar membrane input-output function. In W. L. Madison, P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. M. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, & C. R. Steele (Eds.), The mechanics and biophysics of hearing (pp. 106-113). New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Zeng, F.-G., & Shannon, R. V. (1994). Loudness coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science, 264, 564-566.
37. Zeng, F.-G., & Shannon, R. V. (1995). Possible origins for the non-monotonic intensity discrimination function in forward masking. Hearing Research, 82, 216-224.
38. Zeng, F.-G., & Turner, C. W. (1992). Intensity discrimination in forward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 782-787.
39. Zeng, F.-G., Turner, C. W., & Relkin, E. M. (1991). Recovery from prior stimulation: II. Effects upon intensity discrimination. Hearing Research, 55, 223-230.