Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 379-384

  Fidler, A ^a,b   Likar, B ^a   Pernus F ^a   Skaleric U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b Faculty of Electrical Engineering ^*  (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography, dental, digital; Subtraction technique; Swine

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; JAW RADIOGRAPHY; MANDIBLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SWINE; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SWINE;

EID: 0036834683     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600724     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997; 25: 215-224.
2. Grondahl HG, Grondahl K, Webler RL. A digital subtraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983; 55: 96-102.
3. Vos MH, Janssen PT, van Aken J, Heethaar RM. Quantitative measurement of periodontal bone changes by digital subtraction. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21: 583-591.
4. Bragger U, Pasquali L, Rylander H, Carnes D, Kornman KS. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 27-37.
5. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7: 196-201.
6. Wallace GK. The JPEG still picture compression standard. IEEE Ts Consum Electr 1992; 38: 18-34.
7. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, Montner SM, Giger ML, Metz CE, et al. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991; 178: 175-179.
8. Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7: 123-132.
9. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch Jr MH, et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96: 1157-1164.
10. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Grondahl HG. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 250-254.
11. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WG. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 6-12.
12. Yuasa H, Ariji Y, Ohki M, Naitoh M, Shiojima M, Ushida M, et al. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wide Web. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 93-99.
13. ISO/IEC JTC I/SC 29/WG 1, ISO/IEC FDIS 15444-1: Information technology-JPEG 2000 image coding system: Core coding system [WG 1 N 1890], September 2000.
14. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, Bhalla MP, Blickman JG, Bramson RT, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 463-468.
15. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, Persons KR, Earnest Ft, Savcenko V, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 1998; 206: 599-607.
16. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Persons KR, Earnest Ft, Hartman TE, Harms GF, et al. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10: 97-102.
17. Ricke J, Maass P, Lopez Hanninen E, Liebig T, Amthauer H, Stroszczynski C, et al. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 456-463.
18. Brennecke R, Burgel U, Rippin G, Post F, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Int J Card Imaging 2001; 17: 1-12.
19. Fidler A, Likar B, Pernuš F, Skaleris̀ U. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 106-112.
20. Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21: 486-495.
21. Likar B, Pernuš F. Registration of serial transverse sections of muscle fibers. Cytometry 1999; 37: 93-106.
22. Likar B, Pernuš F. A hirearchical approach to elastic registration based on mutual information. Image and vision computing 2001; 9: 33-44.