Novel factors contributing to the expression of latent inhibition

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 824-836

  Katza, Donald B ^a   Rogersb, Ronald F ^b   Steinmetz, Joseph E ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYELID REFLEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; LATENT INHIBITION; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CONDITIONING, EYELID; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HIPPOCAMPUS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEURONS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036784998     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.5.824     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aguado, L., Symonds, M., & Hall, G. (1994). Interval between preexposure and test determines the magnitude of latent inhibition: Implications for an interference account. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 188-194.
2. Berger, T. W., & Thompson, R. F. (1978). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: I The hippocampus. Brain Research, 145, 323-346.
3. Berthier, N. E., & Moore, J. W. (1990). Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 44-54.
4. Buhusi, C. V., Gray, J. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1998). Perplexing effects of hippocampal lesions on latent inhibition: A neural network solution. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 316-351.
5. Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Critical role of the parahippocampal region for paired-associate learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 740-747.
6. Chen, G.-X., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1998). A general-purpose computer system for behavioral conditioning and neural recording experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 384-391.
7. Clark, A. J. M., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1992). Aspiration lesions of rat ventral hippocampus disinhibit responding in conditioned suppression or extinction, but spare latent inhibition and the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Neuroscience, 48, 821-829.
8. Clarke, M. E., & Hupka, R. B. (1974). The effects of stimulus duration and frequency of daily preconditioning stimulus exposures on latent inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 225-228.
9. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449-518.
10. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1997). Psychobiological models of hippocampal function in learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 481-514.
11. Gould, T. J., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1996). Changes in rabbit cerebellar cortical and interpositus nucleus activity during acquisition, extinction and backward classical eyelid conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 65, 17-34.
12. Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R. C., Gunther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 395-408.
13. Hall, G., & Minor, H. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 36B, B 145-B 169.
14. Han, J. S., Gallagher, M., & Holland, P. (1995). Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7323-7329.
15. Hernandez, L. L., Buchanan, S. L., & Powell, D. A. (1981). CS preexposure: Latent inhibition and Pavlovian conditioning of heart rate and eyeblink responses as a function of sex and CS intensity in rabbits. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 513-518.
16. Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
17. Katz, D. B., Rogers, R. F., & Steinmetz, J. E. (2000). [Failures to find the LI effect.] Unpublished raw data.
18. Katz, D. B., Shock, D. M., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1995). Latent inhibition of the rabbit conditioned eyeblink is not reflected in hippocampal activity. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 21, 1218.
19. Katz, D. B., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1997). Single-unit evidence for eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar cortex is altered, but not eliminated, by interpositus nucleus lesions. Learning & Memory, 4, 88-104.
20. Lubow, R. E., Markman, R. E., & Allen, J. (1968). Latent inhibition and classical conditioning of the rabbit pinna response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 688-694.
21. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
22. Maren, S., & Holt, W. (2000). The hippocampus and contextual memory retrieval in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 97-108.
23. Miller, D. P. (1994). Hippocampal information processing and interactions with brain areas involved in inhibition tone-signaled conditioned responses: An experimental and theoretical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
24. Miller, D. P., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1997). Hippocampal activity during discrimination/reversal eyeblink conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 70-79.
25. Moyer, J. R., Thompson, L. T., & Disterhoft, J. F. (1996). Trace eyeblink conditioning increases CA1 excitability in a transient and learningspecific manner. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5536-5546.
26. Myers, C. E., & Gluck, M. A. (1996). Cortico-hippocampal representations in simultaneous odor discrimination: A computational interpretation of Eichenbaum, Mathews, and Cohen (1989). Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 685-706.
27. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
28. Purves, D., Bonardi, C., & Hall, G. (1995). Enhancement of latent inhibition in rats with electrolytic lesions of the hippocampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 366-370.
29. Reilly, S., Harley, C., & Revusky, S. (1994). Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus enhance latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion and increase resistance to extinction in conditioned taste preference. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 996-1004.
30. Reiss, S., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). CS habituation produces a "latent inhibition effect" but no active "conditioned inhibition." Learning and Motivation, 3, 237-245.
31. Robinson, G. B., Port, R. L., & Stillwell, E. J. (1993). Latent inhibition of the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response is unaffected by the NMDA antagonist MK 801. Psychobiology, 21, 120-124.
32. Rogers, R. F., Katz, D. B., Gorin, R. E., & Steinmetz, J. E. (2001, November). Contextual contributions to the expression of latent inhibition. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.
33. Romano, A. G. (1999). Variations in CS associability and multiple unit hippocampal activity in the rabbit. Behavioural Brain Research, 103, 163-173.
34. Salafia, W. R., & Allan, A. M. (1980). Attenuation of latent inhibition by electrical stimulation of hippocampus. Physiology & Behavior, 24, 1047-1051.
35. Salafia, W. R., & Allan, A. M. (1982). Augmentation of latent inhibition by electrical stimulation of hippocampus. Physiology & Behavior, 29, 1125-1130.
36. Schmajuk, N. A., Gray, J. A., & Lam, Y. W. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
37. Schmaltz, L. W., & Theios, J. (1972). Acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned response in hippocampectomized rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 328-333.
38. Sears, L. L., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1990). Acquisition of classically conditioned-related activity in the hippocampus is affected by lesions of the cerebellar interpositus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 681-692.
39. Shohamy, D., Allen, M. T., & Gluck, M. A. (2000). Dissociating entorhinal and hippocampal involvement in latent inhibition. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 867-874.
40. Siegel, S. (1969a). Effects of CS habituation on eyelid conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 245-248.
41. Siegel, S. (1969b). Generalization of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 69, 157-159.
42. Siegel, S. (1970). Retention of latent inhibition. Psychonomic Science, 20, 161-162.
43. Siegel, S., & Domjan, M. (1971). Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure. Learning and Motivation, 2, 1-11.
44. Solomon, P. R., Brennan, G., & Moore, J. W. (1974). Latent inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response as a function of CS intensity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 445-448.
45. Solomon, P. R., Lohr, A. C., & Moore, J. W. (1974). Latent inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response: Summation tests for active inhibition as a function of number of CS preexposures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 557-559.
46. Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 1192-1203.
47. Suboski, M. D., Di Lollo, V., & Gormezano, I. (1964). Effects of unpaired pre-acquisition exposure of CS and UCS on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the albino rabbit. Psychological Reports, 15, 571-576.
48. Thompson, L. T., Moyer, J., Akase, E., & Disterhoft, J. F. (1994). A system for quantitative analysis of associative learning: Part 1. Hardware interfaces with cross-species applications. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 54, 109-117.
49. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (Vol. 85, pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Weiner, I. (1990). Neural substrates of latent inhibition: The switching model. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 442-461.
51. Yee, B. K., Feldon, J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Latent inhibition in rats is abolished by NMDA-induced neuronal loss in the retrohippocampal region, but this lesion effect can be prevented by systemic haloperidol treatment. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 227-240.