Cortico-hippocampal representations in simultaneous odor discrimination: A computational interpretation of Eichenbaum, Mathews, and Cohen (1989)

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 685-706

  Myers, Catherine E ^a,b   Gluck, Mark A ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; FACILITATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY CORTEX; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PYRIFORM CORTEX; RAT;

EID: 0029811542     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.4.685     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ambros-Ingerson, J., Granger, R., & Lynch, G. (1990). Simulation of paleocortex performs hierarchical clustering. Science, 247, 1344-1348.
2. Bakin, J. S., & Weinberger, N. M. (1990). Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig. Brain Research, 536, 271-286.
3. Berger, T., & Thompson, R. (1978). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. I. The hippocampus. Brain Research, 145, 323-346.
4. Berry, S., & Thompson, R. (1979). Medial septal lesions retard classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response in rabbits. Science, 205, 209-211.
5. Bliss, T., & Lomo, T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. Journal of Physiology, 232, 331-356.
6. Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Critical role of the parahippocampal region for paired association learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 740-747.
7. Buzsaki, G. (1989). Two-stage model of memory-trace formation: A role for "noisy" brain states. Neuroscience, 31, 551-570.
8. Eichenbaum, H. (1992). The hippocampal system and declarative memory in animals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 217-231.
9. Eichenbaum, H., & Bunsey, M. (1995). On the binding of associations in memory: Clues from studies on the role of the hippocampal region in paired associate learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 18-23.
10. Eichenbaum, H., Fagan, A., Mathews, P., & Cohen, N. J. (1988). Hippocampal system dysfunction and odor discrimination learning in rats: Impairment or facilitation depending on representational demands. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 331-339.
11. Eichenbaum, H., Mathews, P., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Further studies of hippocampal representation during odor discrimination learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 1207-1216.
12. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1992). The hippocampus - What does it do? Behavioral and Neural Biology, 57, 2-36.
13. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449-518.
14. Fuller, J., Rosvold, H., & Pribam, K. (1957). The effect on affective and cognitive behavior in the dog of lesions of the piriform-amygdala-hippocampal complex. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 89-96.
15. Gluck, M., & Bower, G. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 225-244.
16. Gluck, M. A., & Granger, R. (1993). Computational models of the neural bases of learning and memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 667-706.
17. Gluck, M., & Myers, C. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
18. Gluck, M., Myers, C., & Goebel, J. (1994). A computational perspective on dissociating hippocampal and entorhinal function (Response to Eichenbaum, et al.). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 478-479.
19. Grossberg, S. (1976). Adaptive pattern classification and recoding: Part I. Biological Cybernetics, 23, 121-134.
20. Hasselmo, M., & Schnell, E. (1994). Laminar selectivity of the cholinergic suppression of synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal region CA1: Computational modeling and brain slice physiology. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3898-3914.
21. Hinton, G. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185-234.
22. Hirsh, R. (1974). The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behavioral Biology, 12, 421-444.
23. Honey, R., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
24. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. (1987). Hippocampal lesions attenuate latent inhibition and the decline of the orienting response in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39B, 107-125.
26. Kimble, D. (1963). The effects of bilateral hippocampal lesions in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 273-283.
27. Kohonen, T. (1984). Self-organization and associative memory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. Levy, W. B., & Steward, O. (1983). Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience, 8, 791-797.
29. Lubow, R. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
30. Luce, R. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103-189). New York: Wiley.
31. Mahut, H. (1971). Spatial and object reversal learning in monkeys with partial temporal lobe ablations. Neuropsychologia, 9, 409-424.
32. Mishkin, M., & Pribam, K. (1954). Visual discrimination performance following partial ablation of the temporal lobe I: Ventral vs. lateral. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 14-20.
33. Mountcastle, V. (1979). An organizing principle for cerebral function: The unit module and the distributed system. In F. Schmitt & F. Worden (Eds.), The neurosciences: Fourth study program (pp. 21-42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Myers, C., Ermita, B., Harris, K., Hasselmo, M., Solomon, P., & Gluck, M. (1996). A computational model of the effects of septohippocampal disruption on classical eyeblink conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 66, 51-66.
35. Myers, C., & Gluck, M. (1994). Context, conditioning and hippocampal re-representation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835-847.
36. Myers, C., Gluck, M., & Granger, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116-138.
37. Otto, T., Schottler, F., Staubli, U., Eichenbaum, H., & Lynch, G. (1991). Hippocampus and olfactory discrimination learning: Effects of entorhinal cortex lesions on olfactory learning and memory in a successive-cue, go-no-go task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 111-119.
38. Pinto Hamuy, T., Santibanez, G., Gonzales, C., & Vicencio, E. (1957). Changes in behavior and visual discrimination preferences after selective ablations of the temporal cortex. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 379-385.
39. Port, R., & Patterson, M. (1984). Fimbrial lesions and sensory preconditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 584-589.
40. Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. Black & W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., & Williams, R. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Rumelhart, D., & Zipser, D. (1985). Feature discovery by competitive learning. Cognitive Science, 9, 75-112.
43. Santibanez, G., & Pinto Hamuy, T. (1957). Olfactory discrimination deficits in monkeys with temporal lobe ablations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 472-474.
44. Saunders, R., & Weiskrantz, L. (1989). The effects of fornix transection and combined fornix transection, mammillary body lesions and hippocampal ablations on object-pair association memory in the rhesus monkey. Behavioral and Brain Research, 35, 85-94.
45. Schacter, D. (1985). Multiple forms of memory in humans and animals. In N. Weinberger, J. McGaugh, & G. Lynch (Eds.), Memory systems of the brain: Animal and human cognitive processes (pp. 351-379). New York: Guilford Press.
46. Schmajuk, N., & DiCarlo, J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.
47. Schmajuk, N., Lam, Y.-W., & Christiansen, B. (1994). Latent inhibition of the rat eyeblink response: Effect of hippocampal aspiration lesions. Physiology and Behavior, 55, 597-601.
48. Shepard, R. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325-345.
49. Solomon, P., & Gottfried, K. (1981). The septohippocampal cholinergic system and classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 95, 322-330.
50. Solomon, P., & Moore, J. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 1192-1203.
51. Squire, L. (1987). Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Squire, L., Zola-Morgan, S., & Chen, K. (1988). Human amnesia and animal models of amnesia: Performance of amnesic patients on tests designed for the monkey. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 210-221.
53. Stanton, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1989). Storing covariance by the associative long-term potentiation and depression of synaptic strengths in the hippocampus. In D. Touretzky (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing I (pp. 394-401). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
54. Staubli, U., Fraser, D., Kessler, M., & Lynch, G. (1986). Studies on retrograde and anterograde amnesia of olfactory memory after denervation of the hippocampus by entorhinal cortex lesions. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 46, 432-444.
55. Staubli, U., Ivy, G., & Lynch, G. (1984). Hippocampal denervation causes rapid forgetting of olfactory information in rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 5885-5887.
56. Sutherland, R., & Rudy, J. (1989). Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory and amnesia. Psychobiology, 17, 129-144.
57. Sutton, R., & Barto, A. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135-170.
58. Suzuki, W. (1994). What can neuroanatomy tell us about the functional components of the hippocampal memory system? (Response to Eichenbaum, et al., target). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 498.
59. Swanson, L. (1979). The hippocampus - New anatomical insights. Trends in Neurosciences, 2, 9-12.
60. Szenthagothai, J. (1975). The "module-concept" in cerebral cortex architecture. Brain Research, 95, 475-496.
61. Thurstone, L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
62. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik, 14, 85-100.
63. Weinberger, N., Ashe, J., Metherate, R., McKenna, T., Diamond, D., & Bakin, J. (1990). Retuning auditory cortex by learning: A preliminary model of receptive field plasticity. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 91-132.
64. Whishaw, I., & Tomie, J.-A. (1991). Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: Implications for hippocampal function. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 787-797.
65. Widrow, B., & Hoff, M. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show and Convention Record, 4, 96-104.
66. Wiener, S., Paul, C., & Eichenbaum, H. (1988). Spatial and behavioral correlates of hippocampal neuronal activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 2737-2763.
67. Winocur, G., & Olds, J. (1978). Effects of context manipulation on memory and reversal learning in rats with hippocampal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 312-321.
68. Witter, M. (1993). Organization of the entorhinal-hippocampal system: A review of current anatomical data. Hippocampus, 3, 33-44.
69. Zola-Morgan, S., & Squire, L. (1985). Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 99, 22-34.
70. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1986). Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: Enduring memory impairments following a bilateral lesion limited to field CAI of the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 2950-2967.
71. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1989a). Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1922-1936.
72. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1989b). Lesions of the hippocampus but not lesions of the fornix or the mammillary nuclei produce long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 898-913.