The genomic revolution and the obstetrician/gynaecologist: From societal trends to patient sessions

Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 729-744

  Evans, Wendy J ^a   Britt, David W ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Access; Diffusion; Diversity; Doctor patient communication; Empathy; Genomic revolution; Primary practice

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENOMICS; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; REVIEW; DIFFUSION; EMPATHY; FAMILY HISTORY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; OBSTETRIC CARE; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECOMMUNICATION;

COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENOMICS; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0036778322     PISSN: 15216934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/beog.2002.0312     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Lin-Fu J & Lloyd-Puryear M. Access to genetic services in the United States: a challenge to genetics in public health. In Khoury MJ, Burke W & Thomson EJ (eds) Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century, pp 273-291. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
2. Collins FS. Medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 341: 28-37.
3. Collins FS. Human genomics: choices and challenges. Presentation to the Governor's Conference on Human Genomics, the Family and the Law, 22 October 2001.
4. Collins FS. Preparing health professionals for the genetic revolution. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 278: 1285-1286.
5. Fuller B. Genetic information: ethical, legal and social issues. Presentation to the US Government Accounting Office, II December 2001.
6. Spence WR. Innovation: The Communication of Change in Ideas, Practices and Products. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
7. Halliday JL, Warren R, McDonald et al. Prenatal diagnosis for women aged 37 years and over: to have or not to have? Prenatal Diagnosis 2001; 21: 842-847.
8. Nagle C, McCarthy P & Wallace EM. Uptake of Down syndrome screening in an Australian Vietnamese population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 40: 157-159.
9. Duster T. Bock to Eugenics. London: Routledge, 1990.
10. Healthy People 2010. US Government Printing Office, www.health.gov/healthypeople.
11. Barry K & Britt DW. Outreach: Targeting high risk women and understanding their relationships with formal institutions. Women's Health Issues (in press).
12. American Medical Association. Genetic testing: a study of consumer attitudes, March 1998: AMA survey results, www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/article/2304-2937.html (accessed 2 March 2002).
13. Freemen AC & Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 1100-1102.
14. Emery J & Hayflick S. The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care. British Medical Journal 2001; 322: 1027-1030.
15. Yoon PW, Chen B, Faucett A et al. Public health impact of genetic tests at the end of the 20th century. Genetics in Medicine 2001; 3: 405-410.
16. Gray WP, Somers J & Buckley TF. Report of a national neurosurgical teleradiology system. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1997; 3 (supplement 1): 36-37.
17. Britt DW, Flore LA, Risinger S et al. Preliminary results comparing telegenetic and face-to-face approaches to genetic counseling. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2002 (under review).
18. Emery J, Walton R, Murphy M et al. Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases. British Medical Journal 1998; 321: 28-32.
19. Gray J, Pompilio-Weitzer G, Jones PC et al. Baby carelink: development and implementation of a www-based system for neonatal home telemedicine. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium, 1998, 351-355.
20. Gray J, Brain K, Iredale R et al. A pilot study of telegenetics. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2000; 6: 245-247.
21. Family Genetix. www.familygenetix.com (accessed 2 March 2002).
22. Berkenstadt M, Shiloh S, Barkai G et al. Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1999; 82: 53-59.
23. Shiloh S, Avidor O, Goodman RM et al. Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1990; 37: 522-529.
24. Pinsky L, Pagon R & Burke W. Genetics through a primary care lens. Western Journal of Medicine 2001; 175: 46-50.
25. Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchel JR et al. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical out-patients. British Medical Journal 1975; 486-489.
26. Petersen M, Holbrook JH, Hales DV et al. Contributions of the history, physical examination and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. Western Journal of Medicine 1992; 156: 163-165.
27. Eisenberg L. Medicine-molecular, monetary, or more than both? Journal of the American Medical Association 1996; 274: 331-334.
28. Harris R, Lane B, Harris H et al. National confidential enquiry into counseling for genetic disorders by non-geneticists: general recommendations and specific standards for improving care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 106: 658-663.
29. Griffin ML, Kavanaugh CM & Sorenson JR. Genetic knowledge, client perspectives and genetic counseling on primary and preventative care in obstetrics and gynecology. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1976; 44: 7-10.
30. Holstein JA & Gubrium JF. The Active Interview. Qualitative Research Methods Series No. 37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
31. Nsiah-Jefferson L. Reproductive genetic services for low-income women and women of color. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 1993; 8 (supplement 1): 107-127.
32. Press NA & Browner CH. Collective fictions: similarities in reasons for accepting maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening among women of diverse ethnic and social class backgrounds. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 1993; 8 (supplement 1): 97-107.
33. Rapp R. Sociocultural differences in the impact of amniocentesis. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 1993; 8 (supplement 1): 90-96.
34. Benkendorf JL, Prince MB, Rose MA et al. Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2001; 106: 199-207.
35. Epstein RM, Morse DS, Frankel RM et al. Awkward moments in patient/physician communication about HIV risk. Annals of Internal Medicine 1998; 128: 422-435.
36. Stead ML, Fallowfield L, Brown JM & Selby P. Communication about sexual problems and sexual concerns in ovarian cancer: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 836-837.
37. Ventres W, Nichter M, Reed R & Frankel M. Do-not-resuscitate discussions: a qualitative analysis. Family Practice Research Journal 1992; 12: 157-169.
38. Lippman A. Embodied knowledge and making sense of prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1999; 8: 255-274.
39. Harris H, Scotcher D, Hartley N et al. Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in early pregnancy by general practitioners. British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 1580-1583.
40. Bekker H, Modell M, Dennis G et al. Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing in primary care: supply push or demand pull? British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 1584-1586.
41. Britt DW. Applied sociology. In Borgotta EF & Montgomery RJV (eds) Encyclopedia of Sociology: Revised Edition. New York: MacMillan, 1999.
42. Evans WJ. A comparative analysis of receptivity in inner-city prenatal clinics. Dissertation Abstracts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2000.
43. McCarthy Veach P, Truesdell SE, LeRoy BS & Bartels DM. Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1999; 8: 191-216.
44. Britt DW, Risinger ST, Mans M et al. Determinants of parental decisions after the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: bringing in context. American Journal of Medical Genetics 2000; 93: 410-416.
45. Evans JP, Skrzynia C & Burke W. The complexities of predictive genetic testing. British Medical Journal 2001; 322: 1052-1056.
46. Becker G. The Elusive Embryo. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.
47. Pearson M. The impact of chemotherapy; a personal experience. Second national multidisciplinary conference for health care professionals working with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2002. London, 26-27 February 2002.
48. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press, 1962.
49. Spiro H. What is empathy and can it be taught? Annals of Internal Medicine 1992; 15: 843-846.
50. Sanson-Fisher RW & Poole AD. Training medical students to empathize: an experimental study. Medical Journal of Australia 1978; 1: 473-476.
51. Poole AD & Sanson-Fisher RW. Long-term effects of empathy training on the interview skills of medical students. Patient Counseling and Health Education 1980; 2: 125-127.
52. Stewart M, Brown J & Weston W. Patient centered interviewing. III. Five provocative questions. Canadian Family Physician 1989; 35: 159-161.
53. Frankel RM & Stein TS. The Four Habits of Highly Effective Clinicians: A Practical Guide. California: Kaiser Permanente, 1996.
54. Roter D & Frankel R. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Science and Medicine 1992; 34: 1097-1103.
55. Svarstad B. The patient-physician encounter: an observational study of communication and outcome. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1974.
56. Frankel RM. Talking in interviews: a dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In Pathas G (ed.) Interaction Competence, pp 231-262. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1990.
57. Mishler E. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
58. Beckman HB, Frankel RM & Darnley J. Soliciting the patient's complete agenda: a relationship to the distribution of concerns. Clinical Research 1985; 33: 714-719.
59. Roter DL & Hall JS. Physician interviewing styles and medical information obtained from patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1987; 2: 326.
60. Canter R. Patients and medical power. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 411-414.
61. Beckman HB & Frankel RF. The effect of provider behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine 1984; 10: 692-696.
62. Maynard D. Notes on the delivery and reception of diagnostic news regarding mental disabilities. In Helm D, Anderson T, Meehan A & Rawls A (eds) The Interaction Order: New Directions in the Study of Social Order. New York: Irvington, 1989.
63. Rogers C. Empathic: an unappreciated way of being. Counseling Psychologist 1975; 5: 2-10.
64. Fraser FC. Current issues in medical genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics 1974; 26: 636-659.
65. Terrell White M. 'Respect for autonomy' in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1997; 6: 297-313.
66. Van Zuuren FJ. The standard of neutrality during genetic counseling: an empirical investigation. Patient Education and Counseling 1997; 32: 69-79.
67. Freeman AC & Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 323: 1100-1103.
68. Somer M, Mustoner H & Norio R. Evaluation of genetic counseling: recall of information, post-counseling reproduction, and attitude of the counselees. Clinical Genetics 1988; 34: 352-365.
69. Michie S, McDonald V & Marteau TM. Genetic counseling: information given, recall, and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling 1996; 32: 101-106.
70. Michie S, Marteau TM & Bodbrow M. Genetic counseling: The psychological impact of meeting patient's expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics 1997; 34: 237-242.
71. Santalahti P. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening? Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy 1988; 18: 153-165.
72. McConkie-Rosell & Sullivan JA. Genetic counseling - stress, coping, and the empowerment perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1999; 8: 345-357.
73. Marteau T & Lerman C. Genetic risk and behavioral change. British Medical Journal 2001; 322: 1056-1059.
74. Ash JS, Lyman J, Carpenter J & Fournier L. A diffusion of innovations model of physician order entry. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 2001; 22-26.
75. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Waldo D & Kriswell K. Optimizing quality improvement in obstetrics: an application of the diffusion of innovations theory. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001; 97: S56.
76. Watt G. Policies to tackle social exclusion. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 175-176.
77. Frader JE & Flanagon-Klygis E. Innovation and research in pediatric surgery. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery 2001; 10: 198-203.