The standard of neutrality during genetic counselling: An empirical investigation

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 69-79

  Van Zuuren, F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Client autonomy; Genetic counselling; Neutrality; Non directiveness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0030774685     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00051-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Van Zuuren FJ: Health care technology: some of its psychological implications. In: Miedema S, Biesta G, Boog B, Smaling A, Wardekker W, Levering B, editors. The politics of human science; Human science at the intersection of politics, education, social change and political decision making. Brussels: VUB University Press / Concord (MA): Paul / Lancaster: Gazelle Book Services, 1994:211-228.
2. Harper PS. Genetic counselling. An introduction. In: Harper PS, editor, Practical Genetic Counselling. London: Wright, 1988:3-17.
3. Witmer JM, Wedl L, Black B Genetic counselling: Ethical and professional role implications. J Couns Develp. 64:1986;337-340.
4. Kitchener KS Intuition, critical evaluation, and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counselling psychology. Couns Psychologist. 12(3):1984;43-55.
5. Directive counselling. Letter to the Editor. Lancet 1982; (2):368-369.
6. Clarke A Is non-directive genetic counselling possible? Lancet. 338(19):1991;998-1001.
7. Tijmstra Tj The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of 'anticipated decision regret'. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 5:1989;207-213.
8. Green JM. Calming or harming? A critical review of psychological effects of fetal diagnosis on pregnant women. London: The Galton Institute, 1990.
9. Lappé M. The predictive power of the new genetics. Hastings Center Report 1984, October:18-21.
10. Lippman A Research studies in applied human genetics; A quantitative analysis and critical review of recent literature. Am J Med Gen. 41:1991;105-111.
11. Wertz FJ, Van Zuuren FJ. Qualitative research: Educational considerations. In Van Zuuren FJ, Wertz FJ, Mook B, editors. Advances in qualitative psychology: themes and variations. Berwyn: Swets North America, 1987:3-25.
12. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research; Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage, 1990.
13. Wet Geneeskundige Behandelings Overeenkomst, WGBO [Dutch Medical Treatment Contracts Act]. The Netherlands Burgelijk Wetboek, Afd. 5, article 446-468; April 1st, 1995.
14. Watzlawick P, Beavin JH, Jackson, DD. Pragmatics of human communications. New York: Norton, 1967.
15. Shiloh S, Sagi M Effect of framing on the perception of genetic recurrence risks. Am J Med Gen. 33:1989;130-135.
16. Van Zuuren FJ, Van Schie ECM, Van Baaren NK. Uncertainty in the information provided during genetic counseling (This Issue).
17. Cioffi D When good news is bad news: Medical wellness as a non-event in undergraduates. Health Psychol. 13:1994;63-72.
18. Michie S, McDonald V, Marteau Th Understanding responses to predictive genetic testing: a grounded theory approach. Psychol Health. 11(4):1996;455-470.
19. Tibben A, Frets PG, van der Kamp JJP, Niermeijer MF, vanderVlis-Vegter M, Roos RAC, Rooijmans HGM, van Ommen G-JB, Verhage F On attitudes and appreciation six months after predictive DNA testing for Huntington's disease in the Dutch program. Am J Med Gen. 48:1993;103-111.