Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 267-273

  Schaneveldt, Shane ^a   Foley, Timothy F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; WATER; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALCOHOL; ASSURE CEMENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; TRANSBOND; TRANSBOND MOISTURE INSENSITIVE PRIMER; TRANSBOND MOISTURE-INSENSITIVE PRIMER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MACHINE; MECHANICS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SALIVA; SCORING SYSTEM; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STORAGE; TOOTH FRACTURE; ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVENESS; ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOMERS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ETHANOL; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SALIVA; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 0036719297     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126594     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
2. Cueto HI. A little bit of history; the first direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:276-7.
3. Mitchell DL. The first direct bonding in orthodontia, revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:187-9.
4. Newman GV. First direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:187-9.
5. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobson JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:80-7.
6. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1998;29:567-72.
7. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995;4:28-32.
8. Itoh T, Fukushima T, Inoue Y, Arita S, Miyazaki K. Effect of water, saliva and blood contamination on bonding of metal brackets with a 4-META/MMA/TBB resin to etched enamel. Am J Dent 1999;12:299-304.
9. Itoh T, Matsuo N, Fukushima T, Inoue Y, Oniki Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Effect of contamination and etching on enamel bond strength of new light-cured glass ionomer cements. Angle Orthod 1999;69:450-6.
10. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-9.
11. Crane MD, Smart CW, Moon HB, Caputo AA. Effect of moisture contamination on bracket bond strength of hydrophilic bonding materials. J Dent Res 2000;79:548.
12. Feigal RJ, Hitt J, Splieth C. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:88-97.
13. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int 1992;23:625-7.
14. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strengths of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992;5:318-20.
15. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 1972;132:133-5.
16. Kent BE, Lewis BG, Wilson AD. The properties of a glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1973;135:322-6.
17. Cook PA. Direct bonding with glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:509-11.
18. Fajen VB, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Angolkar PV. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:316-22.
19. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strength of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:127-30.
20. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent 1997;25:243-9.
21. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.
22. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-9.
23. Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkmann P, Süssenberger U, Miethke R. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:402-7.
24. Ewoldsen N, Beatty MW, Erickson L, Feely D. Effects of enamel conditioning on bond strength with a restorative light-cured glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:621-4.
25. Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:620-4.
26. McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Barnwell S. Bond strength of light-cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:47-52.
27. Meehan MP, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:125-32.
28. Fricker JP. A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:384-6.
29. Ashcraft DB, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:260-5.
30. Cobo JM, Moro JM. Hydrophilic adhesive for bonding to impacted canines. J Clin Orthod 1994;28:600.
31. Miller RA. A light-cured hybrid compomer for bonding to impacted canines. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:331-3.
32. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophilic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod 2000;27:181-6.
33. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF, Sinhoreti MAC. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 1999;12:181-4.
34. Rix DW, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and a glass filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:36-42.
35. Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:251-5.
36. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.
37. Buonocore MG. Retrospectives on bonding. Dent Clin North Am 1981;25:241-55.
38. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
39. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:231-6.
40. Buonocore MG, Wileman W, Brudevold F. A report on a resin composition capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Dent Res 1956;35:846-51.
41. Ferrari M, Goracci G, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three "one-bottle" systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:224-30.
42. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured Phenyl-P in TEGDMA to smear layer-retained bovine dentin. Quint Int 1993;24:335-42.
43. Kugel G, Farrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131 (suppl):20-5S.
44. American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Dentin bonding systems: an update. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:91-5.
45. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states. J Biomed Mat Res 1982;16:265-73.
46. Kanca J. Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996;9:273-6.
47. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Obershachtsiek H, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation after NaOCL treatment. Oper Dent 2000;25:40-5.
48. Chung C, Fadem BW, Levitt HL, Mante FK. Effects of two adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:295-9.
49. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.
50. Lalani N, Foley T, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras AH. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod 2000;70:28-33.
51. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:514-9
52. O'Brien RD, Watts DC, Read MJF. Residual debris and bond strength - is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:222-30.