Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 243-249

  Rock, W P ^a,b   Abdullah, M S B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acid etch technique; Orthodontic bonding

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; DYRACT; FLUORIDE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICATE; TRANSBOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FLUORIDES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0031137847     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00022-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.
2. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. A J Orthodont 1988; 94: 476-483.
3. Carstensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthodont 1986; 89: 70-72.
4. Wang WN, Lu TL. Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth. Am J Orthodont 1991; 100: 72-79.
5. Beech DR. Adhesion to Teeth, Principles and Mechanism: Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1982; Vol. II.
6. Schechter G, Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ. The effect of adhesive thickness on retention of direct bonded brackets. J Dent Res 1980; 59 (Abstr. 72): 285.
7. Mackay F. The effect of adhesive type and thickness on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthodont 1992; 19: 35-39.
8. Buonocure MG. The Use of Adhesives in Dentistry. Illinois: Charles C Thoman, 1975.
9. Lovius BBJ, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period. Br J Orthodont 1987; 14: 11-20.
10. Greenlaw D, Way DC, Galil KA. An in vitro evaluation of a visible light cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding systems. Am J Orthodont 1989; 96: 214-220.
11. Reynolds IR, Von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthodont 1975; 2: 171-178.
12. Maijer R, Smith DC. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthodont 1981; 79: 20-34.
13. Ferguson JW, Read MJF, Watts DC. Bond strengths of an integral bracket base combination: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthodont 1984; 6: 267-276.
14. Dyract, A Single Component Compomer. The Technology Behind it. De Trey Dentsply, D-78467, Konstanz, Germany.
15. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthodont 1994; 21: 33-43.
16. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthodont 1984; 85: 333-340.
17. Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthodont 1988; 93: 346-348.