The phylogeny of the Histeroidea (Coleoptera: Staphyliniformia)

Cladistics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 394-415

  Caterino, Michael S ^a,c   Vogler, Alfried P ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Canalization; Ecomorphology; Myrmecophily; Optimization alignment; Partitioned Bremer support; POY

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; ECOMORPHOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; MYRMECOPHILY; PHYLOGENY;

ANAPLEUS; COLEOPTERA; DENDROPHILUS; HISTERIDAE; HISTEROIDEA; ONTHOPHILUS; STAPHYLINIFORMIA;

EID: 0036705474     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00158.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abouheif, E., Zardoya, R., Meyer, A., 1998. Limitations of metazoan 18S rDNA sequence data: Implications for reconstructing a phylogeny of the animal kingdom and inferring the reality of the Cambrian explosion. J. Mol. Evol. 47, 394-405.
2. Archangelsky, M., 1998. Phylogeny of Hydrophiloidea using characters from adult and preimaginal stages. Syst. Entomol. 23, 9-24.
3. Bates, H.W., 1863. The Naturalist on the River Amazons. John Murray, London.
4. Beutel, R.G., 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Hydrophiloidea based on characters of the head of adults and larvae. Koleopt. Rund. 64, 103-131.
5. Beutel, R.G., 1999. Morphology and evolution of the larval head of Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea. Tijds. Entomol. 142, 9-30.
6. Böving, A.G, Craighead, F.C., 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principle larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomol. Am. (N.S.) 11, 1-351.
7. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
8. Campbell, B.C., Steffen-Campbell, J.D., Sorensen, J.T., Gill, R.J., 1997. Paraphyly of Homoptera and Auchenorrhyncha inferred from 18S rDNA nucleotide sequences. Syst. Entomol. 20, 175-194.
9. Carpenter, J.M., 1988. Choosing among equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4, 291-296.
10. Caterino, M.S., Shull, V.L., Hammond, P.M., Vogler, A.P., 2002. The basal phylogeny of the Coleoptera based on 18S rDNA sequences. Zool. Scr. 31, 41-49.
11. Crowson, R.A., 1955. The Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera. Nathaniel Lloyd, London.
12. Crowson, R.A., 1974. Observations on Histeroidea, with descriptions of an apterous larviform male and of the internal anatomy of a male Sphaerites. J. Entomol. (B) 42, 133-140.
13. Estabrook, G.F., McMorris, F.R., Meacham, C.A., 1985. Comparison of undirected phylogenetic trees based on subtrees of four evolutionary units. Syst. Zool. 34, 193-200.
14. Gardner, J.C.M., 1930. The early stages of Niponius andrewsi. Bull. Entomol. Res. 21, 15-17 [+1 plate].
15. Giribet, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer, W., Wheeler, W.C., 2000. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: A combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 49, 539-562.
16. Gladstein, D., Wheeler, W.C., 1999. POY: Phylogeny Reconstruction via Direct Optimization Alignment. Version 2.0. American Museum of Natural History.
17. Hancock, J.M., Tautz, D., Dover, G.A., 1988. Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 393-414.
18. Hancock, J.M., Vogler, A.P., 2000. How slippage-derived sequences are incorporated into rRNA variable-region secondary structure: Implications for phylogeny reconstruction. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14, 366-374.
19. Hansen, M., 1991. The hydrophiloid beetles. Phylogeny, classification, and a revision of the genera. Biol. Skr. 40, 1-368.
20. Hansen, M., 1997. Phylogeny and classification of the staphyliniform beetle families. Biol. Skr. 48, 1-339.
21. Helava, J.V.T., Howden, H.F., Ritchie, A.J., 1985. A review of the New World genera of the myrmecophilous and termitophilous subfamily Hetaeriinae. Sociobiology 10, 127-386.
22. Kluge, A., 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: Cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14, 151-158.
23. Kovarik, P.W., Passoa, S., 1993. Chaetotaxy of larval Histeridae based on a description of Onthophilus nodatus LeConte. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86, 560-576.
24. Lawrence, J.F., Britton, E.B., 1991. Australian Beetles. Melbourne University Press, Carleton.
25. Lawrence, J.F., Newton, A.F., 1982. Evolution and classification of beetles. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 13, 261-290.
26. Lawrence, J.F., Newton, A.F., 1995. Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references, and data on family-group names). In: Pakaluk, J., Ślipiński, S.A. (Eds.), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of the Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warsaw, pp. 779-1006.
27. Löbl, I., 1996. A new species of Sphaerites from China. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Suisse 69, 195-200.
28. Mamayev, B.M., 1974. The immature stages of the beetle Syntelia histeroides Lewis in comparison with certain Histeridae. Entomol. Rev. 53, 98-101.
29. Mateu, J., 1972. Les insectes xylophages des Acacia dans les regions sahariennes. Pub. Inst. Zool. Dr. Augusto Nombre 116, 1-714.
30. Mazur, S., 1997. A world catalogue of Histeridae. Genus (Suppl.), 1-373.
31. Newton, A.F., 1991. Agyrtidae-Silphidae (pp. 324-341); Pselaphidae (pp. 353-355); Sphaeritidae-Histeridae (pp. 341-352). In: Stehr, F.W. (Ed.), Immature Insects, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque.
32. Newton, A.F., 2000. Sphaeritidae. In: Arnett, R.H., Thomas, M.C. (Eds.), American Beetles. CRC Press, Gainesville, FL, pp. 209-211.
33. Nikitsky, N.B., 1976a. Larval morphology and mode of life of Histeridae in bark beetle passages. Entomol. Rev. 55, 102-111.
34. Nikitsky, N.B., 1976b. On the morphology of a larva Sphaerites glabratus and the phylogeny of Histeroidea. Zool. Z. 55, 531-537.
35. Ohara, M., 1994. A revision of the superfamily Histeroidea of Japan. Insecta Mastumurana 51, 1-283.
36. Penny, D., Hendy, M.D., 1985. The use of tree comparison metrics. Syst. Zool. 34, 75-82.
37. Phillips, A., Janies, D., Wheeler, W., 2000. Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16, 317-330.
38. Shull, V.L., Vogler, A.P., Baker, M.D., Maddison, D.R., Hammond, P.M., 2001. Sequence alignment of 18S ribosomal RNA and the basal relationships of adephagan beetles: Evidence for monophyly of aquatic families and the placement of Trachypachidae. Syst. Biol. 30, 945-969.
39. Ślipiński, S.A. Mazur, S., 1999. Epuraeosoma, a new genus of Histerinae and phylogeny of the family Histeridae. Ann. Zool. 49, 209-230.
40. Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Wolf, P.G., Nickrent, D.L., Chaw, S.-M., Chapman, R.L., 1999. The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: Pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1774-1784.
41. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4.0b8. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
42. Tautz, D., Hancock, J.M., Webb, D.A., Tautz, C., Dover, A., 1988. Compete sequence of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 366-376.
43. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
44. Wenzel, R.L., 1944. On the classification of histerid beetles. Fieldiana Zool. 28, 51-151.
45. Wheeler, W.C., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321-331.
46. Wheeler, W.C., 1996. Optimization alignment: The end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenefics? Cladistics 12, 1-9.
47. Whiting, M.F., Carpenter, J.C., Wheeler, Q., Wheeler, W.C., 1997. The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46, 1-68.