Toward vocabulary domain specifications for health level 7-coded data elements

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 333-342

  Bakken, Suzanne ^a   Campbell, Keith E ^b   Cimino, James J ^a   Huff, Stanley M ^c   Hammond, W Ed ^d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LINGUISTICS; NOMENCLATURE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0033940973     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070333     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Campbell KE, Cohn SP, Chute CG, Shortliffe EH, Rennels G. Scalable methodologies for distributed development of logic-based convergent medical terminology. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5):426-39.
2. Chute CG, Cohn SP, Campbell JR. A framework for comprehensive terminology systems in the United States: development guidelines, criteria for selection, and public policy implications. ANSI Health Care Informatics Standards Board Vocabulary Working Group and the Computer-based Patient Records Institute Working Group on Codes and Structures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(6):503-10.
3. Cimino JJ. The concepts of language and the language of concepts. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5):311.
4. Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5): 394-403.
5. Hammond WE. Call for a standard clinical vocabulary. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):254-5.
6. Huff SM, Rocha RA, McDonald CJ, et al. Development of the LOINC (Logical Observations Identifiers, Names, and Codes) Vocabulary. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(3):276-92.
7. Rector AL, Bechhofer S, Goble CA, Horrocks I, Nowlan WA, Solomon WD. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artif Intell Med. 1997;9:139-71.
8. Spackman KA, Campbell KE, Cote RA. SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care. In: Masys D (ed). AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:640-4.
9. Campbell J, Carpenter P, Sneiderman C, Cohn S, Chute C, Warren J. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):238-51.
10. Chute CG, Cohn SP, Campbell KE, Oliver DE, Campbell JR. The content coverage of clinical classifications. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(3):224-33.
11. Henry SB, Warren J, Lange L, Button P. A review of the major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they meet the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(4):321-8.
12. Henry SB, Mead CN. Nursing classification systems: necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):222-32.
13. About HL7. Health Level 7 Web site. Available at: http:// www.h17.org. Accessed May 17, 2000.
14. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. New York: IEEE, 1990.
15. Rossi-Mori A, Consorti F, Galeazzi E. Standards to support development of terminological systems for health care telematics. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5):551-63.
16. Health Level 7. Message Development Framework. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Level 7, 1999.
17. Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32:282-91.
18. Rector AL, Glowinski AJ, Nowlan WA, Rossi-Mori A. Medical concept models and medical records: an approach based on GALEN and PEN & PAD. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2(1):19-35.
19. American Dental Association. Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature. Chicago, Ill: ADA, 1998.
20. American Dental Association. Systemized Nomenclature of Dentistry (SNODENT). Chicago, Ill: ADA, 1998.
21. American Medical Association. Physician's Current Procedural Terminology. Chicago, Ill: AMA, 1993.
22. Alternate Billing Concepts. Version 983. Las Cruces, NM: Alternate Link LLC, 1998.
23. Centers for Disease Control. Centers for Disease Control Common Data Element Implementation Guide. Atlanta, Ga: CDC, 1998.
24. First DataBank National Drug Data File, Master Drug Data Base, International Drug Data File, PIF, DDID, Multilex, Drug Knowledge Base, FDBDX, Medical Conditions. San Bruno, Calif: First DataBank, 1998.
25. Health Care Financing Administration. Health Care Financing Administration Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS): Level II Alpha-Numeric Codes. Baltimore, Md: HCFA, 1998.
26. Saba VK. The Classification of Home Health Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, 1990.
27. United States National Center for Health Statistics. International Classification of Diseases: 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) Washington, DC: NCHS, 1980.
28. Health Care Financing Administration. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) Procedure Coding Systems (PCS). Baltimore, Md: HCFA, 1998.
29. World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA). International Classification of Primary Care. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: WONCA, 1998.
30. World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA). International Classification of Primary Care Drug Codes. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: WONCA, 1998.
31. Medicomp Systems I: MEDCIN. Chantilly, Va: Medicomp Systems, 1998.
32. Multum MediSource Lexicon. Denver, Colo: Multum Information Services, 1998.
33. O'Neil MJ, Payne C, Read JD. Read Codes, Version 3: a user led terminology. Methods Inf Med. 1995;34:187-92.
34. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification 1999-2000. Philadelphia, Pa: NANDA, 1999.
35. Grobe SJ. The Nursing Intervention Lexicon and Taxonomy: Implications for representing nursing care data in automated records. Holistic Nurs Pract. 1996;11(1):48-63.
36. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1996.
37. Johnson M, Maas M (eds). Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1997.
38. Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: Applications for Community Health Nursing. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1992.
39. Ozbolt J, Fruchtnicht JN, Hayden JR. Toward data standards for clinical nursing information. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:175-85.
40. Kleinbeck SVM. In search of perioperative nursing data elements. AORN J. 1996;63(5):926-31.
41. Russian Translation of MeSH. Moscow, Russia: State Central Scientific Medical Library, 1998.
42. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:61-74.
43. Humphreys BL, McCray AT, Cheh ML. Evaluating the coverage of controlled health data terminologies: report on the results of the NLM/AHCPR Large Scale Vocabulary Test. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(6):484-500.
44. Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association. Standards for medical identifiers, codes, and messages needed to create an efficient computer-stored medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:1-7.
45. Rector AL. Thesauri and formal classifications: terminologies for people and machines. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5):501-9.