US of ductal carcinoma in situ

Radiographics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 269-281

  Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Myung, Jae Sung ^a   Lee, Yu Jin ^a   Park, In Ae ^a   Noh, Dong Young ^a,b   Im, Jung Gi ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, 00.32; Breast neoplasms, calcifications, 00.812; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.1298; Breast neoplasms, US, 00.1298

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0036517454     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr16269     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Schnitt SJ, Silen W, Sadowsky NL, Connolly JL, Harris JR. Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 898-903.
2. Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology 1989; 170:411-415.
3. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989; 172:235-241.
4. Silverstein MJ. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: diagnostic and therapeutic controversies. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192:196-214.
5. Feig SA. Ductal carcinoma in situ: implications for screening mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:653-668.
6. Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology 1989; 172:661-666.
7. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420.
8. Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11:167-180.
9. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 172.
10. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
11. Teboul M. Ductal echography. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackeloer BJ, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1994; 110-126.
12. Swann CA, Kopans DB, McCarthy KA, White G, Hall DA. Localization of occult breast lesions: practical solutions to problems of triangulation. Radiology 1987; 163:577-579.
13. Sickles EA. Sonographic detectability of breast calcifications. Proc SPIE 1983; 419:51-52.
14. Rizzatto G, Chersevani R, Abbona M, Lombardo VL, Macorig D. High-resolution sonography of breast carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24:11-19.
15. Ranieri E, D'Andrea MR, D'Alessio A, et al. Ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer associated with isolated clustered microcalcifications, mammographically identified. Anticancer Res 1997; 17:2831-2835.
16. Hashimoto BE, Kramer DJ, Picozzi VJ. High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high-resolution sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:501-508.
17. Gufler H, Buitrago-Tellez CH, Madjar H, Allmann KH, Uhl M, Rohr-Reyes A. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Acta Radiol 2000; 41:217-221.
18. Moon WK, Im JG, Noh DY, Yeon KM, Han MC. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 2000; 217:849-854.
19. Kasumi F, Sakuma H. Ultrasonic image of non-invasive carcinomas. In: Madjar H, Teubner J, Hackeloer BJ, eds. Breast ultrasound update. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1994; 168-173.
20. Stavros AT. Ultrasound of ductal carcinoma in situ. In: Silverstein MJ, ed. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1997; 135-158.
21. Boyages J, Recht A, Connolly J, et al. Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 16-23.
22. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Mravunac M, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990; 335:519-522.
23. Soo MS, Williford ME, Walsh R, Bentley RC, Kornguth PJ. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:321-326.
24. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:449-457.
25. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208:717-723.
26. Rubin E, Mennemeyer ST, Desmond RA, et al. Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma: impact of ultrasound and image-guided biopsies on a clinical breast practice. Cancer 2001; 91:324-332.
27. Moon WK, Im JG, Noh DY, Yeon KM, Han MC. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent. Radiology 2000; 217:240-246.
28. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199.
29. Buchberger W, Dekoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 921-927.
30. Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 214:59-66.
31. Slawson SH, Johnson BA. Ductography: how to and what if. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:133-150.