Argument structure, argument content, and cognitive change in children's peer interaction

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 40-57

  Leman, Patrick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument; Cognitive development; Influence; Peers; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LOGIC; MALE; MORALITY; PEER GROUP; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SEMANTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LOGIC; LONDON; MALE; MORALS; PEER GROUP; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0036513703     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: 19400896     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221320209597967     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ames, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894-897.
2. Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C. K., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. J. (1997). On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 135-167.
3. Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1982). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 399-410.
4. Bohner, G., Erb, H.P., Reinhard, M.-A., & Frank, E. (1996). Distinctiveness across topics in minority and majority influence: An attributional analysis and preliminary data British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 27-46.
5. Constanzo, P. R., Coie, J. D., Grummet J., & Famhill, D. (1973). A re-examination of the effects of intention and consequences on children's moral judgements. Child Development, 45, 799-802.
6. Damon, W., & Killen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children's moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 399-410.
7. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and sociocognitive conflict. In U. Flick, (Ed.), The psychology of the social (pp. 77-90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Doise, W., Mugny, W., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 367-383.
10. Duveen, G. (1997). Psychological development as a social process. In L. Smith, J. Dock-erell, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond (pp. 67-90). London: Rout-ledge.
11. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Imamoglu, E. M. (1975). Children's awareness and usage of intention cues. Child Development, 46, 39-45.
13. Kruger, A. C. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(2), 191-211.
14. Kyratzis, A., & Ervin Tripp, S. (1999). The development of discourse markers in peer interaction, Journal of Pragmatics, 31(10), 1321-1338.
15. Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children's understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(5), 683-702.
16. Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children's moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 557-575.
17. Levy, E. T. (1999). A social-pragmatic account of the development of planned discourse. Human Development, 42, 225-246.
18. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
19. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1980). Studies in social influence: V. Minority influence and conversion behaviour in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 270-282.
20. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
21. Paicheler, G. (1985). Psychologie des influences sociales [The psychology of social influence], Paris: Delachaux & Niestle.
22. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.
23. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Brun, J., Saada, E. H., & Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L. (1984). Learning: A social actualization and reconstruction of knowledge. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 52-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
25. Piaget, J. (1923). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge.
26. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge.
27. Piaget, J. (1962). Comments on Vygotsky's critical remarks concerning the 'Language and thought of the child' and 'Judgment and reasoning in the child.' Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Piaget, J. (1974). The development of physical quantities in the child: Conservation and atomism. London: Routledge.
29. Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1952). The child's conception of number. London: Routledge.
30. Roazzi, A., & Bryant, P. (1998). The effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical social interaction on children's logical inferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 175-181.
31. Rumain, B., Connell, J., & Braine, M. (1983). Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: If is not the biconditional. Developmental Psychology, 19, 471-481.
32. Russell, J. (1981). Why socio-cognitive conflict may be impossible: The status of egocentric errors in the dyadic performance of a spatial task. Educational Psychology, 1, 159-169.
33. Russell, J. (1982). Cognitive conflict, transmission and justification: Conservation attainment through dyadic interaction. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 140, 283-297.
34. Russell, J., Mills, I., & Reiff-Musgrove, P. (1990). The role of symmetrical and asymmetrical social conflict in cognitive change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 58-78.
35. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Sprott, R. A. (1992). Children's use of discourse markers in disputes-Form function relations and discourse in child language. Discourse Processes, 15(4), 423-439.
37. Tannen, D. (1996). Gender and discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Tudge, J. R. H., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piaget-ian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M. H. Bomstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Verba, M. (1998). Tutoring interactions between young children: How can symmetry modify asymmetrical interactions. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 22(1), 195-216.
40. Verba, M., & Winnikamen, F. (1992). Expert-novice interaction: Influence of partner status. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(1), 61-71.
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Watts, R. J. (1992). Acquiring status in conversation-Male and female discourse strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(5), 467-503.
43. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal affects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 9(2), 1-27.