A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 321-327

  Friedlander, Lara T ^a   Love, Robert M ^b,c   Chandler, Nicholas P ^b  

^a University of Otago ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOOTH APEX; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0036513208     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.120802     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504.
2. Kobayashi C. Electronic canal length measurement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:226-31.
3. Walton RE. Access preparation and length determination. In: Walton RE, Torabinejad M, editors. Principles and practice of endodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996. p. 189-90.
4. Shoha RR, Dawson MS, Richards AG. Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:294-303.
5. Wengraf A. Angulation in periapical radiography. Br Dent J 1965;118:528-31.
6. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:152-60.
7. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: II. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:708-16.
8. Pitt Ford T. The radiographic detection of periapical lesions in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:662-7.
9. Lee S, Messer H. Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions. Int Endod J 1986;19:64-72.
10. Barbat J, Messer H. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. J Endod 1998;24:837-42.
11. Gröndahl H-G, Wenzel A, Borg E, Tammisalo E. An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography. Dent Update 1996;23:334-7.
12. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NH. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Quintessence Int 1990;21:789-94.
13. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Int Endod J 1991;24:233-9.
14. Ellingsen MG, Harrington GW, Hollender LG. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for the detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation. J Endod 1995;21:326-31.
15. Fuge KN, Stuck AMC, Love RM. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 1998;31:123-6.
16. Borg E, Gröndahl H-G. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by photostimulable storage phosphor system. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:20-4.
17. Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:607-12.
18. Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:325-8.
19. Luostarinen T, Tammisalo T, Vahatalo E, Tammisalo E. Comparison of intraoral digital and film radiography for the diagnosis of periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:92-3.
20. Holtzmann DJ, Johnson WT, Southard TE, Khademi JA, Chang PJ, Rivera EM. Storage-phosphor computed radiography versus film radiography in the detection of pathologic periradicular bone loss in cadavers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:90-7.
21. Tirrell BD, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 1996;22:74-8.