Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 607-612

  Velders, Xandra L ^a   Sanderink, Gerard C H ^a   Van Der Stelt, Paul F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; ODONTOMETRY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REFERENCE VALUES; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0030141225     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80057-6     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Sanderink GCH. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids. Int Dent J 1993;43:335-42.
2. Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Nummikoski P, Matteson S. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:652-60.
3. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994; 28:363-7.
4. Pass B, Furkart AJ, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Gregson PH. 6-Bit and 8-bit digital radiography for detecting simulated periodontal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77:406-11.
5. Russell M, Pitts NB. Occlusal caries diagnosis: radiovisiography vs bitewing radiography. Caries Res 1991;25:217.
6. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R. RadioVisioGraphy for caries detection: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. J Dent Res 1992;71:705.
7. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman SE. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length: the RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:125-32.
8. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Quint Int 1990;21:789-94.
9. Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NHF. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment. Int Endod J 1991; 24:233-9.
10. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Mikkelsen L, Mouyen F. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth: a comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy. Caries Res 1991;72:621-6.
11. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Gr[0094]ndahl H-G. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:250-4.