Storage-phosphor computed radiography versus film radiography in the detection of pathologic periradicular bone loss in cadavers

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 90-97

  Holtzmann, David J ^a   Johnson, William T ^b   Southard, Thomas E ^b   Khademi, John A ^c   Chang, Paul J ^d   Rivera, Eric M ^b  

^a Southern Illinois University School of Dental Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; CADAVER; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0032109730     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90156-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Thunthy KH, Weinberg R. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of group D and E. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:250-2.
2. Farman A, Mendel R, von Fraunhofer J. Ultraspeed versus Ektaspeed X-ray film: endodontists' perceptions. Journal of Endodontics 1988;14:615-9.
3. Kleier D, Benner S, Averbach R. Two dental X-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:201-5.
4. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. Journal of Endodontics 1982;8:161-70.
5. Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Endodontic success - who's reading the radiograph? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:432-7.
6. Zakariasen K. Endodontic recall radiographs: how reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:343.
7. Stheeman S, Mileman P, van't Hof M, van der Stell P. Room for improvement?: the accuracy of dental practitioners who diagnose bony pathoses with radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:251-4.
8. Pitt Ford T. The radiographic detection of periapical lesions in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:662-7.
9. Seltzer S, Turkenkopf S, Vito A, Green D, Bender IB. A histologic evaluation of periapical repair following positive and negative root canal cultures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:507-32.
10. Brynolf I. A histological and roentgenological study of the periapical region of human upper incisors. Odont Revy 1967;18(suppl 11):1-97.
11. Green T, Walton R, Taylor J, Merrell P. Radiographic and histologic periapical findings of root canal treated teeth in cadaver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:707-11.
12. Sonoda M, Tokono M, Miyahara J, Kato H. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 1983;148:833-8.
13. Kassemier N, Frieleng J, Hendriks J. Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 1993;28:413-9.
14. Cowen A, Brettle D, Coleman N, Parkin G. A preliminary investigation of the imaging performance of photoslimulable phosphor computed radiography using a new design of mammographic quality control lesl object Br J Radiol 1992;65:528-35.
15. Workman A, Cowen A, Brettle D. Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographie x-ray imaging system. Br J Radiol 1994;67:988-96.
16. Brettle D, Ward S, Parkin G, Cowen A, Sumsion H. A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. Br J Radiol 1994;67:464-8.
17. Kashima I, Kanno M, Higashi T, Takano M. Computed panoramic tomography with scanning laser-stimulated luminescence. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:448-53.
18. Kashima I, Sakurai T, Matsuki T, Nakamura K, Aoki H, Ishii M. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plale. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Palhol 1994;78:239-46.
19. Svanaes D, Møystad A, Risnes S, Larheim T, Gröndahl H. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:94-100.
20. Lim K, Loh E, Hong Y. Intra-oral computed radiography: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent 1996;24:359-64.
21. Velders X, Sanderink G, van der Stelt P. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:607-12.
22. Borg E, Gröndahl H. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1996;12:20-4.
23. Brettle D, Workman A, Ellwood R, Launders J, Horner K, Davies R. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1996;69:256-61.
24. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE. Interpretation of periapical lesions using radiovisiography. Journal of Endodontics 1994;20:490-4.
25. Tirrell BC, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. Journal of Endodontics 1996;22:74-8.
26. Hanley J. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989;29:307-35.
27. Dorfman D, Berbaum K, Metz C. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992:9:723-31.
28. Chang P. Evaluating imaging test performance: an introduction to Bayesian analysis for urologists. Monographs in Urology 1991;12:18-34.
29. Thunthy K, Weinberg R. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak Ektaspeed Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995:79:117-21.