Chemical database techniques in drug discovery

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 220-227

  Miller, Mitchell A ^a  

^a Lion Biosciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BACLOFEN; NEW DRUG; NSC 211972; NSC 295295; NSC 31636; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; AGENTS INTERACTING WITH TRANSMITTER, HORMONE OR DRUG RECEPTORS; DRUG;

CHEMICAL BOND; COMBINATORIAL LIBRARY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG CONFORMATION; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG STRUCTURE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHARMACOPHORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; DRUG DESIGN; FACTUAL DATABASE;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NEUROTRANSMITTER AGENTS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;

EID: 0036491696     PISSN: 14741776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrd745     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Voigt, J. H., Bienfait, B., Wang, S. & Nicklaus, M. C. Comparison of the NCI open database with seven large chemical structural databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 702-712 (2001).
2. Trinjastic, N. (ed.) Chemical Graph Theory (CRC, Boca Raton, 1983).
3. Balaban, A. T. Applications of graph theory in chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25, 334-343 (1985).
4. Dalby, A. et al. Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at Molecular Design Limited. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32, 244-255 (1992).
5. Dury, L., Latour, T., Leherte, L., Barberis, F. & Vercauteren, D. P. A new graph descriptor for molecules containing cycles. Application as screening criterion for searching molecular structures within large databases of organic compounds J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1437-1445 (2001).
6. Weininger, D. SMILES 1. Introduction and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31 (1988).
7. Warr, W. A. Combinatorial chemistry and molecular diversity. An overview. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 134-140 (1997).
8. Leland, B. A. Managing the combinational explosion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 62-70 (1997).
9. Walters, W. P., Stahl, M. T. & Murcko, M. A. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Discov. Today 3, 160-178 (1998).
10. Schultz, J. L. & Wilks, E. S. Dendritic and star polymers: classification, nomenclature, structure representation, and registration in the DuPont SCION database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38, 85-99 (1998).
11. Wipke, W. T. & Dyott, T. M. Stereochemically unique naming algorithm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 4834-4840 (1974).
12. Gasteiger, J., Rudolph, C. & Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comp. Methodol. 3, 537-547 (1990).
13. Pearlman, R. S. CONCORD: rapid generation of high quality approximate 3D molecular structures. Chem. Des. Autom. News 2, 1 (1987).
14. Rusinko, A. Using CONCORD to construct a large database of three-dimensional coordinates from connection tables. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29, 327-333 (1989).
15. Crippen, G. M. & Havel, T. F. Stable calculation of coordinates from distance information. Acta Cryst. A34, 282-284 (1978).
16. Hahn, M. Three-dimensional shape-based searching of conformationally flexible compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 80-86 (1997).
17. Paris, C. G. Chemical structure handling by computer. Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci. Technol. 32, 271-338 (1997/1998).
18. Barnard, J. M. & Downs, G. M. Computer representation and manipulation of combinatorial libraries. Persp. Drug Discov. Des. 7/8, 13-30 (1997).
19. Martin, Y. C., Bures, M. G. & Willett, P. Searching databases of three-dimensional structures. Reviews Comput. Chem. 1, 213-263 (1990).
20. Good, A. C. & Mason, J. S. Three-dimensional structure database searches. Reviews Comput. Chem. 7, 67-117 (1995).
21. Nicklaus, M. C. et al. HIV-1 integrase pharmacophore: discovery of inhibitors through three-dimensional database searching. J. Med. Chem. 40, 920-929 (1997).
22. Pickett, S. D., Mason, J. S. & McLay, I. M. Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores: pharmacophore-derived queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36, 1214-1223 (1996).
23. Greenidge, P. A., Carlsson, B., Bladh, L. -G. & Gillner, M. Pharmacophores incorporating numerous excluded volumes defined by X-ray crystallographic structure in three-dimensional database searching: application to the thyroid hormone receptor. J. Med. Chem. 41, 2503-2512 (1998).
24. Olender, R. & Rosenfeld, R. A fast algorithm for searching for molecules containing a pharmacophore in very large virtual combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 731-738 (2001).
25. Mason, J. S. et al. New four-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatonal libraries containing privilege substructures. J. Med. Chem. 42, 3251-3264 (1999).
26. Downs, G. M. & Willett, P. Similarity searching in databases of chemical structures. Rev. Comput. Chem. 7, 1-66 (1995).
27. Singh, S. B., Sheridan, R. P., Fluder, E. M. & Hull, R. D. Mining the chemical quarry with joint chemical probes: an application of latent semantic structure indexing (LaSSI) and TOPOSIM (Dice) to chemical database mining. J. Med. Chem. 44, 1564-1575 (2001).
28. Hefferlin, R. & Matus, M. T. Molecular similarity for small species: refining the isoelectronic index. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 484-494 (2001).
29. Sheridan, R. P., Miller, M. D., Underwood, D. J. & Kearsley, S. K. Chemical similarity using geometric atom pair descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36, 128-136 (1996).
30. Hull, R. D. et al. Latent semantic structure indexing (LaSSI) for defining chemical similarity. J. Med. Chem. 44, 1177-1184 (2001).
31. Nilakantan, R., Bauman, N., Dixon, J. S. & Venkataraghavan, R. Topological torsion: a new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 27, 82-85 (1987).
32. Brown, R. D. & Martin, Y. C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 1-9 (1997).
33. Schuffenhauer, A., Gillet, V. J. & Willett, P. Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: analysis of the BIOSTER database using two-dimensional fingerprints and molecular field descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. 40, 295-307 (2000).
34. Rhodes, N., Willett, P., Dunbar, J. B. Jr & Humblet, C. Bit-string methods for selective compound acquisition. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40, 210-214 (2000).
35. Xue, L., Stahura, F. L., Godden, J. W. & Bajorath, J. Fingerprint scaling increases the probability of identifying molecules with similar activity in virtual screening calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 746-753 (2001).
36. Butina, D. Unsupervised database custering based on Daylight's fingerprint and Tanimoto similarity: a fast and automated way to cluster small and large data sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 747-750 (1999).
37. Xue, L., Stahura, F. L., Godden, J. W. & Bajorath, J. Mini-fingerprints detect similar activity of receptor ligands previously recognized only by three-dimensional pharmacophore-based methods. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 394-401 (2001).
38. Matter, H. & Pötter, T. Comparing 3D pharmacophore triplets and 2D fingerprints for selecting diverse compound subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 1211-1225 (1999).
39. McGregor, M. J. & Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore fingerprinting. 1. Application to QSAR and focused library design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 569-574 (1999).
40. Xue, L. & Bajorath, J. Molecular descriptors for effective classification of biologically active compounds based on principal component analysis identified by a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40, 801-809 (2000).
41. Willett, P., Barnard, J. & Downs, G. M. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38, 983-996 (1998).
42. Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R. & Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 161, 269-288 (1982).
43. Shoichet, B. K., Bodian, D. L. & Kuntz, I. D. Molecular docking using shape descriptors. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 380-397 (1992).
44. Meng, E. C., Shoichet, B. K. & Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 505-524 (1992).
45. Bissantz, C., Folkers, G. & Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scorng combinations. J. Med. Chem. 43, 4759-4767 (2000).
46. Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. J., Murcko, M. A. & Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 42, 5100-5109 (1999).
47. Perola, E. et al. Successful virtual screening of a chemical database for farnesyltransferase inhibitor leads. J. Med. Chem. 43, 401-408 (2000).
48. Lipinkski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W. & Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Defiv. Rev. 23, 3-25 (1997).
49. Higgs, R. E., Bemis, K. G., Watson, I. A. & Wikel, J. H. Experimental designs for selecting molecules from large chemical databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 861-870 (1997).
50. Brown, R. D. & Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sol. 36, 572-584 (1996).
51. Xue, L., Godden, J., Gao, H. & Bajorath, J. Identification of a preferred set of molecular descriptors for compound classification based on principal components analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 699-704 (1999).
52. Mason, J. S. & Pickett, S. Partition-based selection. Persp. Drug Discov. Des. 7/8, 85-114 (1997).
53. Barnard, J. M. & Downs, G. M. Clustering of chemical structures on the basis of two-dimensional similarity measures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32, 644-649 (1992).
54. Guénoche, A., Hansen, P. & Jaumard, B. Efficient algorithms for divisive hierarchical clustering with the diameter criterion. J. Classification 8, 5-30 (1991).
55. Barnard, J. M. & Downs, G. M. Chemical fragment generation and clustering software. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 141-142 (1997).
56. Lavecchia, A., Greco, G., Novellino, E., Vittorio, F. & Ronsisvalle, G. Modelling of κ-opioid receptor/agonist interactions using pharmacophore-based and docking simulations. J. Med. Chem. 43, 2124-2134 (2000).
57. Rughooputh, S. D. D. V. & Rughooputh, H. C. S. Neural network based chemical structure indexing. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 713-717 (2001).
58. Ozawa, K., Yasuda, T. & Fujita, S. Substructure search with tree-structured data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37, 688-695 (1997).
59. Pang, Y. P., Perola, E., Xu, K. & Prendergast, F. G. EUDOC: a computer programme for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases. J. Comput. Chem. 22, 1750-1771 (2001).