Preoperative local MRI-staging of patients with a suspected pancreatic mass

European Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 296-303

  Fischer, Uwe ^a   Vosshenrich, R ^a   Horstmann, O ^a   Becker, H ^a   Salamat, B ^a   Baum, F ^a   Grabbe, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cancer; MR angiography; MR cholangiopancreatography; MR imaging; Pancreas; Staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMMON BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENTERITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVER METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOMA; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATITIS; PERITONEUM METASTASIS; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036479885     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-001-1149-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T (1991) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 41:19-36
2. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C (1992) Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 326:455-465
3. Allen-Mersh TG (1982) Significance of the site of origin of pancreatic exocrine adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 35:544-546
4. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD (1990) Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 211:447-458
5. Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV et al. (1991) Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 161:120-124
6. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK (1998) CT and MR evaluation of pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 7:103-124
7. Tscholakoff D, Hricak H, Thoeni R et al. (1987) MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Am J Roentgenol 148:703-709
8. Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K et al. (1997) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg 226:393-405
9. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. (1999) MR imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. Tumori 85 (Suppl):6-10
10. Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Vosshenrich R et al. (1999) Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 211:51-58
11. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiye J et al. (1997) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 202:655-662
12. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmacher W et al. (1991) Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted CE-FAST sequence. Radiology 181:805-808
13. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T et al. (1998) Optimal MR cholangiopancreaticographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 206:379-387
14. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW et al. (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreaticography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21-32
15. Meaney JFM (2000) Non-invasive evaluation of the visceral arteries with magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 9:1267-1276
16. Grist TM (2000) MRA of the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:32-43
17. Redvantly RD, Nelson RC, Sieber AC et al. (1995) Imaging in the preoperative evaluation of adult liver-transplant candidates: goals, merits of various procedures and recommendations. Am J Roentgenol 164:611-617
18. Kreft B, Strunk H, Flacke S et al. (2000) Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 216:86-92
19. Gaa J, Wendl K, Tesdal IK et al. (1999) Combined use of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography and contrast enhanced dual phase 3D MR angiography in diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: initial clinical results. Fortschr Rontgenstr 170:528-533
20. Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Gaa J et al (1999) The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. Fortschr Rontgenstr 170:463-469
21. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA et al. (1999) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Roentgenol 173:583-590
22. Müller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P et al. (1994) Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 190:745-751