Hepatic blood supply: Comparison of optimized dual phase contrast- enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

Radiology

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 51-58

  Kopka, Lars ^a   Rodenwaldt, Jens ^a   Vosshenrich, Rolf ^a   Fischer, Uwe ^a   Renner, Beatrice ^a   Lorf, Thomas ^a   Graessner, Joachim ^b   Ringe, Burckhardt ^a   Grabbe, Eckhardt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Liver blood supply; Liver, MR; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; FAT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER BLOOD FLOW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0032903632     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99mr2251     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kraus BB, Ros PR, Abbitt PL, Kerns SR, Sabatelli FW. Comparison of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging in the evaluation of candidates for TIPS. JMRI 1995; 5:571-578.
2. Lewis WD, Finn JP, Jenkins RL, Carretta M, Longmaid HE, Edelman RR. Use of magnetic resonance angiography in the pretransplant evaluation of portal vein pathology. Transplantation 1993; 9:46-48.
3. Nghiem HV, Winter TC III, Mountford MC, et al. Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: value of phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR 1995; 164:871-878.
4. Winter TC III, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. Radiology 1995; 195: 363-370.
5. Lomas DJ, Britton PD, Alexander GJ, Calne RY. A comparison of MR and duplex Doppler ultrasound for vascular assessment prior to orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Radiol 1994; 5:307-310.
6. Ward J, Martinez D, Chalmers AG, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ, Smith MA. Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and portal vein. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:214-222.
7. Applegate GR, Thaete FL, Meyers SP, et al. Blood flow in the portal vein: velocity quantitation with phase-contrast MR angiography Radiology 1993; 187:253-256.
8. Burkart DJ, Johnson CD, Morton MJ, Ehman RI. Phase-contrast cine MR angiography in chronic liver disease. Radiology 1995; 195: 101-105.
9. Finn JP, Kane RA, Edelman RR, et al. Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography vs duplex Doppler sonography. AJR 1993; 161:989-994.
10. Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Winter TC III, Mack LA, Yuan C. Phase-contrast MR angiography of the portal venous system: preoperative findings in liver transplant recipients. AJR 1994; 163:445-450.
11. Suto Y, Ohuchi Y, Kimura T, et al. Three-dimensional black blood MR angiography of the liver during breath-holding: a comparison with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Acta Radiol 1994; 35:131-134.
12. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with x-ray angiography. Radiology 1994; 191:741-745.
13. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197:785-792.
14. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR 1996; 166:971-981.
15. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996; 200:569-571.
16. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TKF, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997; 203:109-114.
17. Shirkhoda A, Konez O, Shetty AN, Bis KG, Ellwood RA, Kirsch MJ. Mesenteric circulation: three-dimensional MR angiography with a gadolinium-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. Radiology 1997; 202:257-261.
18. Michels NA. Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs with a descriptive atlas. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1955.
19. Meaney JF, Prince MR, Nostrant TT, Stanley JC. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. JMRI 1997; 7:171-176.
20. Chambers TP, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA, Urban B, Venbrux AC. Identification of the aberrant hepatic artery with axial spiral CT. JVIR 1995; 6:959-964.
21. Nelson RC, Lovett KE, Chezmar JL, et al. Comparison of pulsed Doppler sonography and angiography in patients with portal hypertension. AJR 1987; 149:77-81.
22. Winter TC III, Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Hommeyer SC, Mack LA. Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:771-780.
23. Roobottom CA, Dubbins PA. Significant disease of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries in asymptomatic patients: predictive value of Doppler sonography. AJR 1993; 161: 985-988.
24. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, De Corato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996; 201:705-710.
25. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR 1998; 170:345-348.
26. Iwao T, Toyonaga A, Oho K, et al. Postprandial splanchnic hemodynamic response in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: evaluation with "triple vessel" duplex US. Radiology 1996; 201:711-715.
27. Sadek AG, Mohamed FB, Outwater EK, El-Essawy SS, Mitchell DG. Respiratory and post-prandial changes in portal flow rate: assessment by phase contrast MR imaging. JMRI 1996; 1:90-93.