Regulatory principles of developmental signaling

Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 18, Issue , 2002, Pages 515-539

  Freeman, M ^a   Gurdon, J B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drosophila; Ligand; Morphogen; Transduction; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

CELL FATE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DROSOPHILA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; RECEPTOR UPREGULATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; XENOPUS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;

CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; LIGAND;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CELL LINEAGE; EMBRYO; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; FEEDBACK, BIOCHEMICAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, ANIMAL; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0036439523     PISSN: 10810706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.083458     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Baeg GH, Perrimon N. 2000. Functional binding of secreted molecules to heparan sulfate proteoglycans in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:575-80
2. Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, Reizes O, Fitzgerald ML, et al. 1999. Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:729-77
3. Bienz M. 1997. Endoderm induction in Drosophila: The nuclear targets of the inducing signals. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:683-88
4. Bourillot PY, Garrett N, Gurdon JB. 2002. A changing morphogen gradient is interpreted by continuous transduction flow. Development 129:2167-80
5. Briscoe J, Ericson J. 1999. The specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic Hedgehog signalling. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:353-62
6. Bubnoff A, Cho KWY. 2001. Intracellular BMP signaling regulation in vertebrates: Pathway or network? Dev. Biol. 239:1-14
7. Casci T, Vinós J, Freeman M. 1999. Sprouty, an intracellular inhibitor of Ras signalling. Cell 96:655-65
8. Chamoun Z, Mann RK, Nellen D, von Kessler DP, Bellotto M, et al. 2001. Skinny hedgehog, an acyltransferase required for palmitoylation and activity of the hedgehog signal. Science 293:2080-84
9. Chang C, Sternberg PW. 1999. C. elegans vulval development as a model system to study the cancer biology of EGFR signaling. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 18:203-13
10. Chen Y, Struhl G. 1996. Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87:553-63
11. Chuang PT, Kornberg TB. 2000. On the range of hedgehog signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:515-22
12. Clandinin TR, DeModena JA, Sternberg PW. 1998. Inositol trisphosphate mediates a RAS-independent response to LET-23 receptor tyrosine kinase activation in C. elegans. Cell 92:523-33
13. Dale L, Jones CM. 1999. BMP signalling in early Xenopus development. BioEssays 21: 751-60
14. Díaz-Benjumea FJ, Hafen E. 1994. The sevenless signaling cassette mediates Drosophila EGF receptor function during epidermal development. Development 120:569-78
15. Dixon JE, Kintner CR. 1989. Cellular contacts required for neural induction in Xenopus embryos: Evidence for two signals. Development 106:749-57
16. Drossopoulou G, Lewis KE, Sanz-Ezquerro JJ, Nikbakht N, McMahon AP, et al. 2000. A model for anteroposterior patterning of the vertebrate limb based on sequential long-and short-range Shh signalling and Bmp signalling. Development 127:1337-48
17. Dubois L, Lecourtois M, Alexandre C, Hirst E, Vincent JP. 2001. Regulated endocytic routing modulates wingless signaling in Drosophila embryos. Cell 105:613-24
18. Dyson S, Gurdon JB. 1998. The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors. Cell 93:557-68
19. Faure S, Lee MA, Keller T, ten Dijke P, Whitman M. 2000. Endogenous patterns of TGFb superfamily signaling during early Xenopus development. Development 127:2917-31
20. Flores GV, Duan H, Yan H, Nagaraj R, Fu W, et al. 2000. Combinatorial signaling in the specification of unique cell fates. Cell 103: 75-85
21. Freeman M. 1996. Reiterative use of the EGF receptor triggers differentiation of all cell types in the Drosophila eye. Cell 87:651-60
22. Freeman M. 1997. Cell determination strategies in the Drosophila eye. Development 124: 261-70
23. Freeman M. 2000. Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature 408:313-19
24. Fuqua C, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. 1996. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: The LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:727-51
25. Gallera J. 1971. Primary embryonic induction in birds. Adv. Morphog. 9:149-80
26. Ghiglione C, Carraway KL 3rd, Amundadottir LT, Boswell RE, Perrimon N, Duffy JB. 1999. The transmembrane molecule kekkon 1 acts in a feedback loop to negatively regulate the activity of the Drosophila EGF receptor during oogenesis. Cell 96:847-56
27. Goldstein B. 1995. An analysis of the response to gut induction in the C. elegans embryo. Development 121:1227-36
28. Golembo M, Schweitzer R, Freeman M, Shilo B-Z. 1996. Argos transcription is induced by the Drosophila EGF receptor pathway to form an inhibitory feedback loop. Development 122:223-30
29. Grainger RM, Gurdon JB. 1989. Loss of competence in amphibian induction can take place in single nondividing cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:1900-4
30. Green JB, New HV, Smith JC. 1992. Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71:731-39
31. Greenberg ME, Ziff EB. 1984. Stimulation of 3T3 cells induces transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene. Nature 311:433-38
32. Grimm OH, Gurdon JB. 2002. Nuclear exclusion of Smad2 is a mechanism leading to loss of competence. Nat. Cell Biol. In press
33. Gurdon JB, Bourillot PY. 2001. Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413:797-803
34. Gurdon JB, Harger P, Mitchell A, Lemaire P. 1994. Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient. Nature 371:487-92
35. Gurdon JB, Kato K, Lemaire P. 1993. The community effect, dorsalization and mesoderm induction. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3:662-67
36. Hill CS. 2001. TGF-beta signalling pathways in early Xenopus development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:533-40
37. Holley SA, Jackson PD, Sasai Y, Lu B, De Robertis EM, et al. 1995. A conserved system for dorsal-ventral patterning in insects and vertebrates involving sog and chordin. Nature 376:249-53
38. Holtzer H. 1968. Induction of chondrogenesis: A concept in terms of mechanism. In Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions, ed. R Fleischmajer, EE Billingham, pp. 152-64. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
39. Hörstadius S. 1973. Experimental Embryology of Echinoderms. Oxford, UK: Clarendon
40. Ingham PW. 2001. Hedgehog signaling: A tale of two lipids. Science 294:1879-81
41. Jessell TM. 2000. Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: Inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1:20-29
42. Jin MH, Sawamoto K, Ito M, Okano H. 2000. The interaction between the Drosophila secreted protein argos and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibits dimerization of the receptor and binding of secreted spitz to the receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 20:2098-107
43. Jones EA, Woodland HR. 1987. The development of animal cap cells in Xenopus: A measure of the start of animal cap competence to form mesoderm. Development 101:557-63
44. Joshi-Banka D, Deshmukh S, Modak SP. 2001. The neural inductive signal is transferred to ectoblast in 1-2 h but a continued contact with mesoblast for 2-3 h is essential for neuralization in the chick area pellucida. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45:767-70
45. King ML, Zhou Y, Bubunenko M. 1999. Polarizing genetic information in the egg: rNA localization in the frog oocyte. BioEssays 21:546-57
46. Lee JD, Treisman JE. 2001. Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein. Curr. Biol. 11:1147-52
47. Lee JR, Urban S, Garvey CF, Freeman M. 2001. Regulated intracellular ligand transport and proteolysis controls EGF signal activation in Drosophila. Cell 107:161-71
48. Lee MA, Heasman J, Whitman M. 2001. Timing of endogenous activin-like signals and regional specification of the Xenopus embryo. Development 128:2939-52
49. Li Q, Loeb JA. 2001. Neuregulin-heparan-sulfate proteoglycan interactions produce sustained erbB receptor activation required for the induction of acetylcholine receptors in muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 276:38068-75
50. Lo RS, Massague J. 1999. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of TGF-beta-activated smad2. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:472-78
51. Loeb JA, Fischbach GD. 1995. ARIA can be released from extracellular matrix through cleavage of a heparin-binding domain. J. Cell Biol. 130:127-35
52. Massagué J. 2000. How cells read TGF-beta signals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:169-78
53. Munoz-Sanjuan I, Brivanlou AH. 2001. Early posterior/ventral fate specification in the vertebrate embryo. Dev. Biol. 237:1-17
54. Neumann C, Cohen S. 1997. Morphogens and pattern formation. BioEssays 19:721-29
55. Nicola NA, ed. 1994. Guidebook to Cytokines and Their Receptors. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
56. Nilson LA, Schupbach T. 1999. EGF receptor signaling in Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 44:203-43
57. Pawson T, Saxton TM. 1999. Signaling networks - Do all roads lead to the same genes? Cell 97:675-78
58. Perrimon N, McMahon A. 1999. Negative feedback mechanisms and their roles during pattern formation. Cell 97:13-16
59. Peschon JJ, Slack JL, Reddy P, Stocking KL, Sunnarborg SW, et al. 1998. An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science 282:1281-84
60. Pierreux CE, Nicolas FJ, Hill CS. 2000. Transforming growth factor beta-independent shuttling of Smad4 between the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol. Cell Biol. 20:9041-54
61. Queenan AM, Barcelo G, Van Buskirk C, Schupbach T. 1999. The transmembrane region of Gurken is not required for biological activity, but is necessary for transport to the oocyte membrane in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 89:35-42
62. Schohl A, Fagotta F. 2002. β-catenin, MAPK and Smad signalling during early Xenopus development. Development 129:37-52
63. Schweitzer R, Howes R, Smith R, Shilo B-Z, Freeman M. 1995. Inhibition of Drosophila EGF receptor activation by the secreted protein Argos. Nature 376:699-702
64. Sorkin A, Waters CM. 1993. Endocytosis of growth factor receptors. BioEssays 15:375-82
65. Spemann H. 1901. Über Korrelationen in die Entwicklung des Auges. Verh. Anat. Ges. 15: 61-79
66. Spemann H, Mangold H. 1924. Arch. Mikrosk. Entwickmech. 100:599
67. Spemann H, Schotté O. 1932. Über xeneplastische Transplantation als Mittel zur Analyse der embryonalen Induction. Naturwissenschaften 20:463-67
68. Srinivasan S, Rashka KE, Bier E. 2002. Creation of a Sog morphogen gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 2:91-101
69. Standley HJ, Zorn AM, Gurdon JB. 2001. eFGF and its mode of action in the community effect during Xenopus myogenesis. Development 128:1347-57
70. Steinbach OC, Wolffe AP, Rupp RA. 1997. Somatic linker histones cause loss of mesodermal competence in Xenopus. Nature 389:395-99
71. Streit A, Stern CD. 1999. Neural induction. A bird's eye view. Trends Genet. 15:20-24
72. Strigini M, Cohen SM. 1999. Formation of morphogen gradients in the Drosophila wing. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:335-44
73. Sturtevant MA, O'Neill JW, Bier E. 1994. Down-regulation of Drosophila Egf-r mRNA levels following hyperactivated receptor signaling. Development 120:2593-600
74. Teleman AA, Strigini M, Cohen SM. 2001. Shaping morphogen gradients. Cell 105: 559-62
75. Tickle C. 1999. Morphogen gradients in vertebrate limb development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:345-51
76. Tickle C, Eichele G. 1994. Vertebrate limb development. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10:121-52
77. Tsruya R, Schlesinger A, Reich A, Gabay L, Sapir A, Shilo BZ. 2002. Intracellular trafficking by Star regulates cleavage of the Drosophila EGF receptor ligand Spitz. Genes Dev. 16:222-34
78. Urban S, Lee JR, Freeman M. 2001. Drosophila Rhombod-1 defines a novel family of putative intramembrane serine proteases. Cell 107:173-82
79. Vinós J, Freeman M. 2000. Evidence that Argos is an antagonistic ligand of the EGF receptor. Oncogene 19:3560-62
80. Wang W, Mariani FV, Harland RM, Luo K. 2000. Ski represses bone morphogenic protein signaling in Xenopus and mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:12394-99
81. Wasserman JD, Freeman M. 1997. Control of EGF receptor activation in Drosophila. Trends Cell Biol. 7:431-36
82. Wasserman JD, Freeman M. 1998. An autoregulatory cascade of EGF receptor signalling patterns the Drosophila egg. Cell 95:355-64
83. Wolpert L. 1998. Principles of Development, pp. 399-401. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
84. Xu C, Kauffmann RC, Zhang J, Kladny S, Carthew RW. 2000. Overlapping activators and repressors delimit transcriptional response to receptor tyrosine kinase signals in the Drosophila eye. Cell 103:87-97
85. Yang Y, Drossopoulou G, Chuang PT, Duprez D, Marti E, et al. 1997. Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. Development 124:4393-404
86. Zeng X, Goetz JA, Suber LM, Scott WJ Jr, Schreiner CM, Robbins DJ. 2001. A freely diffusible form of Sonic hedgehog mediates long-range signalling. Nature 411:716-20
87. zür Lage P, Jan YN, Jarman AP. 1997. Requirement for EGF receptor signalling in neural recruitment during formation of Drosophila chordotonal sense organ clusters. Curr. Biol. 7:166-75