Impact of dental devices on cochlear implants

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 40-43

  Roberts, Steven ^a,b,c   West, Lesley A ^b   Liewehr, Frederick R ^a,b   Rueggeberg, Frederick A ^d   Sharpe, Donna E ^d   Potter, Brad J ^d  

^a US Army Dental Activity Fort Gordon   (United States)

^b US Army Endodontic Residency Program   (United States)

^c Endodontics   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROSURGERY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTOID; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS; STATISTICS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT;

CADAVER; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL PULP TEST; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROSURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; MASTOID; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; STATISTICS; TOOTH APEX;

EID: 0036365167     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200201000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Whalen RE, Starmer F, McIntosh HD. Electric hazards associated with cardiac pacing. Ann NY Acad Sci 1964;11:922.
2. Smyth NPD, Parsonnet V, Escher DJW, Furman S. The pacemaker patient and the electromagnetic environment. JAMA 1974;227:1412.
3. Woolley LH, Woodworth J, Dobbs JL. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of electrical pulp testers on dogs with artificial pacemakers. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:1099-101.
4. Walter C. Dental treatment of patients with cardiac pacemaker implants. Quint Int 1975;8:57.
5. Zappa U, Studer M, Merkle A, Graf H, Simona C. Effect of electrically powered dental devices on cardiac parameter function in humans (German). Parodontologie 1991;2:299-308.
6. Miller CS, Leonelli FM, Latham E. Selective interference with pacemaker activity by electrical dental devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1998;85: 3-6.
7. Djourno A, Eyries C. Prosthèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensorial à l'aide d'un bobinage inclus à demeure. Presse Médicale 1957;65:63.
8. House WF, Berliner K. Cochlear implants: from idea to clinical practice. In: Cooper H, ed. Cochlear implants: a practical guide. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc., 1991:9-33.
9. MacLeod P, Chouard CH, Weber JP. French device. In: Schindler RA, Merzenich MM, eds. Cochlear implants. New York: Raven Press, 1985:111-20.
10. Luxford WM, Brackmann D. The history of cochlear implants. In: Gray RF, ed. Cochlear implants. London: Croom Helm, 1985:1-26.
11. Miyamoto RT. Cochlear implants In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JR, Kohut RI, Pillsbury H, Tardy ME Jr, eds. Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. Volume 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company, 1993:1850-8.
12. Heller JW, Brackmann DE, Tucci DL, Nyenhuis JA, Chou CK. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1996;17:724-9. (Pubitemid 26341326)
13. Hunyadi S Jr, Werning JW, Lewin JS, Maniglia AJ. Effect of magnetic resonance images on a new electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device. Am J Otol 1997;18:328-31. (Pubitemid 27239942)
14. Youssefzadeh S, Baumgartner W, Dorffner R, Gstottner W, Trattnig S. MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T. J Computer Assisted Tomogr 1998;22:346-50. (Pubitemid 28396724)
15. Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ. Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging-compatibility and safety aspects. Radiology 1998;208:700-8. (Pubitemid 28405106)