Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 724-729

  Heller, James W ^a   Brackmann, Derald E ^b   Tucci, Debara L ^c   Nyenhuis, John A ^d   Chou, Chung Kwang ^e  

^a Department of Otolaryngology   (United States)

^b HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Purdue University   (United States)

^e CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Interactions; MRI; Nucleus Mini 22

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DISEASE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; MENINGIOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BRAIN STEM; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 0029801435     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cochlear Corporation. Worldwide patient database. Englewood, Colorado: Cochlear Corporation, 1996.
2. Brimacombe JA, Beiter AL. The application of digital technology to cochlear implants. In: Sandlin RE, ed. Understanding digitally programmable hearing aids. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1994.
3. Shannon RV, Fayad J, Moore JK, et al. Auditory brainstem implant II: Postsurgical issues and performance. Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 1993;108:635-43.
4. Schaefer DJ. Bioeffects of MRI and patient safety. In: The physics of MRI. 1992 AAPM Summer School Proceedings: American Institute of Physics, 1992:607-46.
5. Portnoy WM, Matucci K. Cochlear implants as a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Oto Rhinol Otolaryngol 1991;100:195-7.
6. Portillo F, McCreery DB, Waluch V, Mobley JP, Nelson RA. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on auditory brainstem implant. Proceedings of the 3rd International Cochlear Implant Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, 1993.
7. Chou CK, McDougall JA, Chan KW. Absence of RF heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging. Bioelectromagnetics (in press).
8. Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE. Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:801-4.
9. New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983;147:139-48.
10. Shellock FG. MR Imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature. AJR Am J Radiol 1988;151:811-14.
11. Shellock FG, Crues JV High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. AJR Am J Radiol 1988;151:389-92
12. Athey TW. Current FDA guidance for MR patient exposure and considerations for the future. Ann NY Acad Sci 1992;649:242-57.
13. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for content and review of a magnetic resonance diagnostic device 510(k) application. Silver Spring, Maryland: FDA, 1988.
14. Schaefer DJ. Safety aspects of magnetic resonance imaging. In: Magnetic resonance imaging, methodology and applications. New York: VCII, 1988:553-78.
15. Davis PL, Shang C, Talagala L, Pasculle AW. Magnetic resonance imaging can cause focal heating in a non uniform phantom. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993;40:1324-7.
16. Ebriham NA, Coombs RF, Jackson WT, Zeiss J. The effect of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73:1397-8.
17. Lyons CJ, Betz RR, Mesgarzadeh M, Revesz G, Bonakdarpour A, Clancy M. The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on metal spine implants. Spine 1989;14:670-2.
18. Hayes DL, Holmes DR, Gray JE. Effect of 1.5 tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:782-6.