A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layers produced by different bur types and rotational speeds and on the resin-dentin interface

Quintessence International

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 737-747

  Santini, Ario ^a,b,c   Mitchell, Stephen ^c  

^a University of Edinburgh ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c Inglis Green House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conditioner; Gluma CPS bonding system; Resin dentin interface; Smear layer

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA; GLUTARALDEHYDE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED TECHNIQUE; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; GLUTARAL; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SMEAR LAYER;

EID: 0032198185     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pashley DH. The effect of acid etching on the pulpo-dentin complex. Oper Dent 1992;17:229-242.
2. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5:73-77.
3. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. Int Dent J 1994;44:349-359.
4. Titley KC, Smith DC, Chernecky R, Maric B, Chan A. An SEM examination of etched dentin and the structure of the hybrid layer. Can Dent J 1995;61:887-894.
5. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12:262-271.
6. Kubo S, Finger WJ, Muller M, Podsun W. Principles and mechanisms of bonding with dentin adhesive materials. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:62-69.
7. Walshaw PR, McComb D. SEM characterization of the resin-dentin interface with proprietary bonding agents in human subjects. J Dent Res 1994;73:1079-1087.
8. Walshaw PR, McComb D. SEM characterization of the resin-dentin interface produced in-vivo. J Dent 1995;23:281-287.
9. Titley K, Chernecky R, Manic B, Smith D. Penetration of dentin bonding agents into dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:190-194.
10. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993;24:618-631.
11. Chappell RP, Spencer P, Eick JD. The effects of current dentinal adhesives on the dentinal surface. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 851-859.
12. Brännström M, Glantz P-O, Nordenvall K-J. The effect of some cleaning solutions on the morphology of dentin prepared in different ways: An in-vivo study. J Dent Child 1979;46:19-23.
13. Shortall AC. Cavity cleansers in restorative dentistry. BDJ 1981;150:243-247.
14. Brännström M. Dentin and Pulp in Restorative Dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publications, 1982:93-108.
15. Gluma CPS. The new bonding philosophy. Dormagen, Germany: Heraeus Kulzer (formerly Bayer Dental), [promotional material]. 1996.
16. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effects of acid etchant composition and etch duration on enamel loss and resin composite bonding. Am J Dent 1995;8:165-169.
17. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Bream M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71: 1530-1540.
18. Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ. Silica contaminated etched dentin and enamel surfaces: A scanning electron microscopic and bond strength study. Quintessence Int 1994;25:327-333.
19. Finger WJ, Uno S. Bond strength of Gluma CPS using the moist dentin bonding technique. Am J Dent 1996;9:27-30.