Softcopy display requirements for digital mammography

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4681, Issue , 2002, Pages 366-379

  Hemminger, Bradley M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital Mammography; Human Computer Interaction; Image Display; Image Presentation; Image Processing; Image Review; Roam; Softcopy; Zoom

Indexed keywords

CATHODE RAY TUBES; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA REDUCTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY;

DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 0036060223     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.466970     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Establishing a histologic basis for false negative mammograms
2. Digital mammography and related technologies: A perspective from the National Cancer Institute
3. Digital mammography
4. Current status of digital mammography
5. Portal film enhancement: Technique and clinical utility
6. Report of working group on digital mammography: Digital displays and workstation design
7. Evaluation and optimization of contrast enhancement methods for medical images
8. A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities
9. The effect of Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization on the detection of simulated spiculations embedded in digitized mammograms
10. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?
11. The effect of intensity windowing as an image processing tool in the detection of simulated masses embedded in digitized mammograms
12. Image quality assessment of monochrome monitors for medical soft copy display
13. A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: Eyetracker results and workstation design implications
14. Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image processing techniques
15. Interpretation of CT studies: Single-screen workstation versus film alternator
16. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display
17. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: A pictorial essay
18. Digital mammography interpretation-comparison of speed and accuracy of softcopy versus printed film display
19. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search
20. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center
21. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection
22. Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-aided diagnosis
23. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study